* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
@ 2016-06-02 4:56 Rajesh Bhagat
2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rajesh Bhagat @ 2016-06-02 4:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and 20 in case
of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that should
be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and rest of the
read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries to increase/
decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
fails.
2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
blocks.
Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min
= max = 20.
Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
---
common/usb_storage.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c
index 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
--- a/common/usb_storage.c
+++ b/common/usb_storage.c
@@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
* enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands are
* limited to 65535 blocks.
*/
+#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 4095
#define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 65535
#else
+#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 20
#define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 20
#endif
+#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n) (n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
#ifndef CONFIG_BLK
static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV];
@@ -1117,11 +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
unsigned short smallblks;
struct usb_device *udev;
struct us_data *ss;
- int retry;
+ int retry, pos = 0;
+ bool retry_flag = false;
ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK
struct blk_desc *block_dev;
#endif
+ unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
if (blkcnt == 0)
return 0;
@@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
/* XXX need some comment here */
retry = 2;
srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
- if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
- smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
+ if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
+ smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
else
smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
retry_it:
- if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+ debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
+ retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
+ if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
usb_show_progress();
srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
debug("Read ERROR\n");
usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
- if (retry--)
+ if (retry--) {
+ /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+ unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
+ if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
+ smallblks = size;
+ usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
+ pos--;
+ }
+ retry_flag = true;
goto retry_it;
+ }
blkcnt -= blks;
break;
}
start += smallblks;
blks -= smallblks;
buf_addr += srb->datalen;
+
+ /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+ if (!retry_flag) {
+ unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
+ if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
+ usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
+ pos++;
+ }
+ }
} while (blks != 0);
ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
@@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
start, smallblks, buf_addr);
usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
- if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+ if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
debug("\n");
return blkcnt;
}
@@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
unsigned short smallblks;
struct usb_device *udev;
struct us_data *ss;
- int retry;
+ int retry, pos = 0;
+ bool retry_flag = false;
ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK
struct blk_desc *block_dev;
#endif
+ unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
if (blkcnt == 0)
return 0;
@@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
*/
retry = 2;
srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
- if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
- smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
+ if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
+ smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
else
smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
retry_it:
- if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+ debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
+ retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
+ if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
usb_show_progress();
srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
debug("Write ERROR\n");
usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
- if (retry--)
+ if (retry--) {
+ /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+ unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
+ if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
+ smallblks = size;
+ usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
+ pos--;
+ }
+ retry_flag = true;
goto retry_it;
+ }
blkcnt -= blks;
break;
}
start += smallblks;
blks -= smallblks;
buf_addr += srb->datalen;
+
+ /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+ if (!retry_flag) {
+ unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
+ if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
+ usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
+ pos++;
+ }
+ }
} while (blks != 0);
ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
@@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
- if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+ if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
debug("\n");
return blkcnt;
--
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
2016-06-02 4:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks Rajesh Bhagat
@ 2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
2016-06-06 4:19 ` Rajesh Bhagat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2016-06-03 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 06/02/2016 06:56 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
> instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and 20 in case
> of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
>
> It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that should
> be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and rest of the
> read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries to increase/
> decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
>
> 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> fails.
> 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
> blocks.
>
> Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
> is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min
> = max = 20.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
> ---
> common/usb_storage.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c
> index 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
> --- a/common/usb_storage.c
> +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
> @@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
> * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands are
> * limited to 65535 blocks.
> */
> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 4095
> #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 65535
> #else
> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 20
> #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 20
> #endif
> +#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n) (n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
Can this be ever called with n < 0 ? You should make this into a
function to get typechecking on it too.
> #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
> static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV];
> @@ -1117,11 +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> unsigned short smallblks;
> struct usb_device *udev;
> struct us_data *ss;
> - int retry;
> + int retry, pos = 0;
> + bool retry_flag = false;
> ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> #endif
> + unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
How will this behave if you keep alternating between two block_dev
devices ? It will always start looking for the best possible transfer
length from scratch, right ? That's not great ...
> if (blkcnt == 0)
> return 0;
> @@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> /* XXX need some comment here */
> retry = 2;
> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> - if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> - smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> + if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> + smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
> else
> smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> retry_it:
> - if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> + debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> + retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> + if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> usb_show_progress();
> srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> debug("Read ERROR\n");
> usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> - if (retry--)
> + if (retry--) {
> + /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> + if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> + smallblks = size;
> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> + pos--;
> + }
> + retry_flag = true;
> goto retry_it;
What is the reason for having the same code twice in this patch ? Just
pull the identical stuff into a function.
> + }
> blkcnt -= blks;
> break;
> }
> start += smallblks;
> blks -= smallblks;
> buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> +
> + /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> + if (!retry_flag) {
> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> + if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> + pos++;
> + }
> + }
> } while (blks != 0);
> ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>
> @@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
> start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>
> usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> - if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> + if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> debug("\n");
> return blkcnt;
> }
> @@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> unsigned short smallblks;
> struct usb_device *udev;
> struct us_data *ss;
> - int retry;
> + int retry, pos = 0;
> + bool retry_flag = false;
> ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> #endif
> + unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>
> if (blkcnt == 0)
> return 0;
> @@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> */
> retry = 2;
> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> - if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> - smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> + if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> + smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
> else
> smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> retry_it:
> - if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> + debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> + retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> + if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> usb_show_progress();
> srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> debug("Write ERROR\n");
> usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> - if (retry--)
> + if (retry--) {
> + /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> + if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> + smallblks = size;
> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> + pos--;
> + }
> + retry_flag = true;
> goto retry_it;
> + }
> blkcnt -= blks;
> break;
> }
> start += smallblks;
> blks -= smallblks;
> buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> +
> + /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> + if (!retry_flag) {
> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> + if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> + pos++;
> + }
> + }
> } while (blks != 0);
> ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>
> @@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
> PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>
> usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> - if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> + if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> debug("\n");
> return blkcnt;
>
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2016-06-06 4:19 ` Rajesh Bhagat
2016-06-06 13:19 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rajesh Bhagat @ 2016-06-06 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 4:22 AM
> To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: sjg at chromium.org; york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>; Sriram Dash
> <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal
> usb maximum trasfer blocks
>
> On 06/02/2016 06:56 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> > Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer
> > blocks instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and
> > 20 in case of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
> >
> > It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that
> > should be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and
> > rest of the read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries
> > to increase/ decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
> >
> > 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> > fails.
> > 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> > pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
> > blocks.
> >
> > Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
> > is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min =
> > max = 20.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > common/usb_storage.c | 71
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c index
> > 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
> > --- a/common/usb_storage.c
> > +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
> > @@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
> > * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands
> are
> > * limited to 65535 blocks.
> > */
> > +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 4095
> > #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 65535
> > #else
> > +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 20
> > #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 20
> > #endif
> > +#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n) (n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
>
Hello Marek,
> Can this be ever called with n < 0 ? You should make this into a function to get
> typechecking on it too.
>
Yes. When transfer fails for the first time (pos - 1) is passed to this macro. Ok,
I will convert it to a function in v3.
> > #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
> > static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV]; @@ -1117,11
> > +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev,
> lbaint_t blknr,
> > unsigned short smallblks;
> > struct usb_device *udev;
> > struct us_data *ss;
> > - int retry;
> > + int retry, pos = 0;
> > + bool retry_flag = false;
> > ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> > struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> > #endif
> > + unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>
> How will this behave if you keep alternating between two block_dev devices ? It will
> always start looking for the best possible transfer length from scratch, right ? That's
> not great ...
How about adding a field name "cur_xfer_blks" in struct usb_device and updating it
on device basis , it will help retain the value.
struct usb_device {
...
unsigned short cur_xfer_blks;
};
>
> > if (blkcnt == 0)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc
> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> > /* XXX need some comment here */
> > retry = 2;
> > srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> > - if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > - smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> > + if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > + smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
> > else
> > smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> > retry_it:
> > - if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > + debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> > + retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> > + if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > usb_show_progress();
> > srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> > srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> > if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> > debug("Read ERROR\n");
> > usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> > - if (retry--)
> > + if (retry--) {
> > + /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> > + if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> > + smallblks = size;
> > + usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> > + pos--;
> > + }
> > + retry_flag = true;
> > goto retry_it;
>
> What is the reason for having the same code twice in this patch ? Just pull the identical
> stuff into a function.
>
Ok, I will add above code in function namely dec_cur_xfer_blks/ inc_cur_xfer_blks in v3.
Best Regards,
Rajesh Bhagat
> > + }
> > blkcnt -= blks;
> > break;
> > }
> > start += smallblks;
> > blks -= smallblks;
> > buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> > +
> > + /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > + if (!retry_flag) {
> > + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> > + if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> > + usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> > + pos++;
> > + }
> > + }
> > } while (blks != 0);
> > ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
> >
> > @@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
> > start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> >
> > usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> > - if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > + if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > debug("\n");
> > return blkcnt;
> > }
> > @@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> > unsigned short smallblks;
> > struct usb_device *udev;
> > struct us_data *ss;
> > - int retry;
> > + int retry, pos = 0;
> > + bool retry_flag = false;
> > ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> > struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> > #endif
> > + unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
> >
> > if (blkcnt == 0)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> > */
> > retry = 2;
> > srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> > - if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > - smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> > + if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > + smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
> > else
> > smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> > retry_it:
> > - if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > + debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> > + retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> > + if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > usb_show_progress();
> > srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> > srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> > if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> > debug("Write ERROR\n");
> > usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> > - if (retry--)
> > + if (retry--) {
> > + /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> > + if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> > + smallblks = size;
> > + usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> > + pos--;
> > + }
> > + retry_flag = true;
> > goto retry_it;
> > + }
> > blkcnt -= blks;
> > break;
> > }
> > start += smallblks;
> > blks -= smallblks;
> > buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> > +
> > + /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > + if (!retry_flag) {
> > + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> > + if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> > + usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> > + pos++;
> > + }
> > + }
> > } while (blks != 0);
> > ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
> >
> > @@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
> > PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> >
> > usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> > - if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > + if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > debug("\n");
> > return blkcnt;
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
2016-06-06 4:19 ` Rajesh Bhagat
@ 2016-06-06 13:19 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2016-06-06 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 06/06/2016 06:19 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 4:22 AM
>> To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Cc: sjg at chromium.org; york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>; Sriram Dash
>> <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal
>> usb maximum trasfer blocks
>>
>> On 06/02/2016 06:56 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
>>> Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer
>>> blocks instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and
>>> 20 in case of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
>>>
>>> It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that
>>> should be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and
>>> rest of the read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries
>>> to increase/ decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
>>>
>>> 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
>>> fails.
>>> 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
>>> pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
>>> blocks.
>>>
>>> Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
>>> is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min =
>>> max = 20.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>> common/usb_storage.c | 71
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c index
>>> 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
>>> --- a/common/usb_storage.c
>>> +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
>>> @@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
>>> * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands
>> are
>>> * limited to 65535 blocks.
>>> */
>>> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 4095
>>> #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 65535
>>> #else
>>> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK 20
>>> #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK 20
>>> #endif
>>> +#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n) (n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
>>
>
> Hello Marek,
>
>> Can this be ever called with n < 0 ? You should make this into a function to get
>> typechecking on it too.
>>
>
> Yes. When transfer fails for the first time (pos - 1) is passed to this macro. Ok,
> I will convert it to a function in v3.
This should be handled outside of the macro then.
>>> #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
>>> static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV]; @@ -1117,11
>>> +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev,
>> lbaint_t blknr,
>>> unsigned short smallblks;
>>> struct usb_device *udev;
>>> struct us_data *ss;
>>> - int retry;
>>> + int retry, pos = 0;
>>> + bool retry_flag = false;
>>> ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
>>> struct blk_desc *block_dev;
>>> #endif
>>> + unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>>
>> How will this behave if you keep alternating between two block_dev devices ? It will
>> always start looking for the best possible transfer length from scratch, right ? That's
>> not great ...
>
> How about adding a field name "cur_xfer_blks" in struct usb_device and updating it
> on device basis , it will help retain the value.
That might work, yes.
> struct usb_device {
> ...
> unsigned short cur_xfer_blks;
> };
>
>>
>>> if (blkcnt == 0)
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc
>> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>>> /* XXX need some comment here */
>>> retry = 2;
>>> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>> - if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> - smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
>>> + if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> + smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
>>> else
>>> smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
>>> retry_it:
>>> - if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> + debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
>>> + retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
>>> + if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> usb_show_progress();
>>> srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
>>> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>> if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
>>> debug("Read ERROR\n");
>>> usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
>>> - if (retry--)
>>> + if (retry--) {
>>> + /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
>>> + if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
>>> + smallblks = size;
>>> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
>>> + pos--;
>>> + }
>>> + retry_flag = true;
>>> goto retry_it;
>>
>> What is the reason for having the same code twice in this patch ? Just pull the identical
>> stuff into a function.
>>
>
> Ok, I will add above code in function namely dec_cur_xfer_blks/ inc_cur_xfer_blks in v3.
>
> Best Regards,
> Rajesh Bhagat
>
>>> + }
>>> blkcnt -= blks;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> start += smallblks;
>>> blks -= smallblks;
>>> buf_addr += srb->datalen;
>>> +
>>> + /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> + if (!retry_flag) {
>>> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
>>> + if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
>>> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
>>> + pos++;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> } while (blks != 0);
>>> ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>>>
>>> @@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
>>> start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>>>
>>> usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
>>> - if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> + if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> debug("\n");
>>> return blkcnt;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
>> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>>> unsigned short smallblks;
>>> struct usb_device *udev;
>>> struct us_data *ss;
>>> - int retry;
>>> + int retry, pos = 0;
>>> + bool retry_flag = false;
>>> ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
>>> struct blk_desc *block_dev;
>>> #endif
>>> + unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>>>
>>> if (blkcnt == 0)
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
>> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>>> */
>>> retry = 2;
>>> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>> - if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> - smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
>>> + if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> + smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
>>> else
>>> smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
>>> retry_it:
>>> - if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> + debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
>>> + retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
>>> + if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> usb_show_progress();
>>> srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
>>> srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>> if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
>>> debug("Write ERROR\n");
>>> usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
>>> - if (retry--)
>>> + if (retry--) {
>>> + /* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
>>> + if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
>>> + smallblks = size;
>>> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
>>> + pos--;
>>> + }
>>> + retry_flag = true;
>>> goto retry_it;
>>> + }
>>> blkcnt -= blks;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> start += smallblks;
>>> blks -= smallblks;
>>> buf_addr += srb->datalen;
>>> +
>>> + /* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> + if (!retry_flag) {
>>> + unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
>>> + if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
>>> + usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
>>> + pos++;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> } while (blks != 0);
>>> ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>>>
>>> @@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
>>> PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>>>
>>> usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
>>> - if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> + if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> debug("\n");
>>> return blkcnt;
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Marek Vasut
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-06 13:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-02 4:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks Rajesh Bhagat
2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
2016-06-06 4:19 ` Rajesh Bhagat
2016-06-06 13:19 ` Marek Vasut
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.