All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
@ 2016-06-02  4:56 Rajesh Bhagat
  2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rajesh Bhagat @ 2016-06-02  4:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and 20 in case
of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.

It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that should
be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and rest of the
read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries to increase/
decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:

1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
fails.
2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
blocks.

Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min
= max = 20.

Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
---
 common/usb_storage.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c
index 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
--- a/common/usb_storage.c
+++ b/common/usb_storage.c
@@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
  * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands are
  * limited to 65535 blocks.
  */
+#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	4095
 #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	65535
 #else
+#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	20
 #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	20
 #endif
+#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n)	(n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
 static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV];
@@ -1117,11 +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
 	unsigned short smallblks;
 	struct usb_device *udev;
 	struct us_data *ss;
-	int retry;
+	int retry, pos = 0;
+	bool retry_flag = false;
 	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
 	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
 #endif
+	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
 
 	if (blkcnt == 0)
 		return 0;
@@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
 		/* XXX need some comment here */
 		retry = 2;
 		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
-		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
-			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
+		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
+			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
 		else
 			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
 retry_it:
-		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+		debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
+		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
+		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
 			usb_show_progress();
 		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
 		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
 		if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
 			debug("Read ERROR\n");
 			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
-			if (retry--)
+			if (retry--) {
+				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
+				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
+					smallblks = size;
+					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
+					pos--;
+				}
+				retry_flag = true;
 				goto retry_it;
+			}
 			blkcnt -= blks;
 			break;
 		}
 		start += smallblks;
 		blks -= smallblks;
 		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
+
+		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+		if (!retry_flag) {
+			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
+			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
+				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
+				pos++;
+			}
+		}
 	} while (blks != 0);
 	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
 
@@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
 	      start, smallblks, buf_addr);
 
 	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
-	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
 		debug("\n");
 	return blkcnt;
 }
@@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
 	unsigned short smallblks;
 	struct usb_device *udev;
 	struct us_data *ss;
-	int retry;
+	int retry, pos = 0;
+	bool retry_flag = false;
 	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
 	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
 #endif
+	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
 
 	if (blkcnt == 0)
 		return 0;
@@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
 		 */
 		retry = 2;
 		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
-		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
-			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
+		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
+			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
 		else
 			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
 retry_it:
-		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+		debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
+		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
+		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
 			usb_show_progress();
 		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
 		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
 		if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
 			debug("Write ERROR\n");
 			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
-			if (retry--)
+			if (retry--) {
+				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
+				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
+					smallblks = size;
+					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
+					pos--;
+				}
+				retry_flag = true;
 				goto retry_it;
+			}
 			blkcnt -= blks;
 			break;
 		}
 		start += smallblks;
 		blks -= smallblks;
 		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
+
+		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
+		if (!retry_flag) {
+			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
+			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
+				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
+				pos++;
+			}
+		}
 	} while (blks != 0);
 	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
 
@@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
 	      PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
 
 	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
-	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
+	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
 		debug("\n");
 	return blkcnt;
 
-- 
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
  2016-06-02  4:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks Rajesh Bhagat
@ 2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
  2016-06-06  4:19   ` Rajesh Bhagat
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2016-06-03 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 06/02/2016 06:56 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
> instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and 20 in case
> of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
> 
> It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that should
> be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and rest of the
> read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries to increase/
> decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
> 
> 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> fails.
> 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
> blocks.
> 
> Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
> is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min
> = max = 20.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
> ---
>  common/usb_storage.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c
> index 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
> --- a/common/usb_storage.c
> +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
> @@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
>   * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands are
>   * limited to 65535 blocks.
>   */
> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	4095
>  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	65535
>  #else
> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	20
>  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	20
>  #endif
> +#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n)	(n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)

Can this be ever called with n < 0 ? You should make this into a
function to get typechecking on it too.

>  #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
>  static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV];
> @@ -1117,11 +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>  	unsigned short smallblks;
>  	struct usb_device *udev;
>  	struct us_data *ss;
> -	int retry;
> +	int retry, pos = 0;
> +	bool retry_flag = false;
>  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
>  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
>  #endif
> +	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);

How will this behave if you keep alternating between two block_dev
devices ? It will always start looking for the best possible transfer
length from scratch, right ? That's not great ...

>  	if (blkcnt == 0)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>  		/* XXX need some comment here */
>  		retry = 2;
>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> +		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> +			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
>  		else
>  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
>  retry_it:
> -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> +		debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> +		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> +		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>  			usb_show_progress();
>  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>  		if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
>  			debug("Read ERROR\n");
>  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> -			if (retry--)
> +			if (retry--) {
> +				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> +				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> +				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> +					smallblks = size;
> +					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> +					pos--;
> +				}
> +				retry_flag = true;
>  				goto retry_it;

What is the reason for having the same code twice in this patch ? Just
pull the identical stuff into a function.

> +			}
>  			blkcnt -= blks;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		start += smallblks;
>  		blks -= smallblks;
>  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> +
> +		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> +		if (!retry_flag) {
> +			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> +			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> +				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> +				pos++;
> +			}
> +		}
>  	} while (blks != 0);
>  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>  
> @@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
>  	      start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>  
>  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> +	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>  		debug("\n");
>  	return blkcnt;
>  }
> @@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>  	unsigned short smallblks;
>  	struct usb_device *udev;
>  	struct us_data *ss;
> -	int retry;
> +	int retry, pos = 0;
> +	bool retry_flag = false;
>  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
>  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
>  #endif
> +	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>  
>  	if (blkcnt == 0)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>  		 */
>  		retry = 2;
>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> +		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> +			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
>  		else
>  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
>  retry_it:
> -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> +		debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> +		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> +		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>  			usb_show_progress();
>  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>  		if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
>  			debug("Write ERROR\n");
>  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> -			if (retry--)
> +			if (retry--) {
> +				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> +				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> +				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> +					smallblks = size;
> +					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> +					pos--;
> +				}
> +				retry_flag = true;
>  				goto retry_it;
> +			}
>  			blkcnt -= blks;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		start += smallblks;
>  		blks -= smallblks;
>  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> +
> +		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> +		if (!retry_flag) {
> +			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> +			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> +				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> +				pos++;
> +			}
> +		}
>  	} while (blks != 0);
>  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>  
> @@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
>  	      PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>  
>  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> +	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>  		debug("\n");
>  	return blkcnt;
>  
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
  2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2016-06-06  4:19   ` Rajesh Bhagat
  2016-06-06 13:19     ` Marek Vasut
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rajesh Bhagat @ 2016-06-06  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 4:22 AM
> To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: sjg at chromium.org; york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>; Sriram Dash
> <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal
> usb maximum trasfer blocks
> 
> On 06/02/2016 06:56 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> > Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer
> > blocks instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and
> > 20 in case of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
> >
> > It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that
> > should be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and
> > rest of the read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries
> > to increase/ decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
> >
> > 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> > fails.
> > 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> > pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
> > blocks.
> >
> > Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
> > is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min =
> > max = 20.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  common/usb_storage.c | 71
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c index
> > 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
> > --- a/common/usb_storage.c
> > +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
> > @@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
> >   * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands
> are
> >   * limited to 65535 blocks.
> >   */
> > +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	4095
> >  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	65535
> >  #else
> > +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	20
> >  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	20
> >  #endif
> > +#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n)	(n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
> 

Hello Marek, 

> Can this be ever called with n < 0 ? You should make this into a function to get
> typechecking on it too.
> 

Yes. When transfer fails for the first time (pos - 1) is passed to this macro. Ok, 
I will convert it to a function in v3.

> >  #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
> >  static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV]; @@ -1117,11
> > +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev,
> lbaint_t blknr,
> >  	unsigned short smallblks;
> >  	struct usb_device *udev;
> >  	struct us_data *ss;
> > -	int retry;
> > +	int retry, pos = 0;
> > +	bool retry_flag = false;
> >  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> >  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> >  #endif
> > +	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
> 
> How will this behave if you keep alternating between two block_dev devices ? It will
> always start looking for the best possible transfer length from scratch, right ? That's
> not great ...

How about adding a field name "cur_xfer_blks" in struct usb_device and updating it 
on device basis , it will help retain the value.

struct usb_device {
...
        unsigned short cur_xfer_blks;
};
  
> 
> >  	if (blkcnt == 0)
> >  		return 0;
> > @@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc
> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >  		/* XXX need some comment here */
> >  		retry = 2;
> >  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> > -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> > +		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > +			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
> >  		else
> >  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> >  retry_it:
> > -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > +		debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> > +		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> > +		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> >  			usb_show_progress();
> >  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> >  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> >  		if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> >  			debug("Read ERROR\n");
> >  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> > -			if (retry--)
> > +			if (retry--) {
> > +				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > +				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> > +				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> > +					smallblks = size;
> > +					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> > +					pos--;
> > +				}
> > +				retry_flag = true;
> >  				goto retry_it;
> 
> What is the reason for having the same code twice in this patch ? Just pull the identical
> stuff into a function.
> 

Ok, I will add above code in function namely dec_cur_xfer_blks/ inc_cur_xfer_blks in v3.

Best Regards,
Rajesh Bhagat 

> > +			}
> >  			blkcnt -= blks;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  		start += smallblks;
> >  		blks -= smallblks;
> >  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> > +
> > +		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > +		if (!retry_flag) {
> > +			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> > +			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> > +				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> > +				pos++;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> >  	} while (blks != 0);
> >  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
> >
> > @@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
> >  	      start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> >
> >  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> > -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > +	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> >  		debug("\n");
> >  	return blkcnt;
> >  }
> > @@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >  	unsigned short smallblks;
> >  	struct usb_device *udev;
> >  	struct us_data *ss;
> > -	int retry;
> > +	int retry, pos = 0;
> > +	bool retry_flag = false;
> >  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> >  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> >  #endif
> > +	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
> >
> >  	if (blkcnt == 0)
> >  		return 0;
> > @@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >  		 */
> >  		retry = 2;
> >  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> > -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> > +		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> > +			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
> >  		else
> >  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> >  retry_it:
> > -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > +		debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
> > +		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
> > +		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> >  			usb_show_progress();
> >  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> >  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> >  		if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> >  			debug("Write ERROR\n");
> >  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> > -			if (retry--)
> > +			if (retry--) {
> > +				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > +				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
> > +				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> > +					smallblks = size;
> > +					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
> > +					pos--;
> > +				}
> > +				retry_flag = true;
> >  				goto retry_it;
> > +			}
> >  			blkcnt -= blks;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  		start += smallblks;
> >  		blks -= smallblks;
> >  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> > +
> > +		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
> > +		if (!retry_flag) {
> > +			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
> > +			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> > +				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
> > +				pos++;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> >  	} while (blks != 0);
> >  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
> >
> > @@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
> >  	      PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> >
> >  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> > -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> > +	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
> >  		debug("\n");
> >  	return blkcnt;
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
  2016-06-06  4:19   ` Rajesh Bhagat
@ 2016-06-06 13:19     ` Marek Vasut
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2016-06-06 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 06/06/2016 06:19 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 4:22 AM
>> To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Cc: sjg at chromium.org; york sun <york.sun@nxp.com>; Sriram Dash
>> <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal
>> usb maximum trasfer blocks
>>
>> On 06/02/2016 06:56 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
>>> Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer
>>> blocks instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and
>>> 20 in case of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
>>>
>>> It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that
>>> should be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and
>>> rest of the read/write are performed with that optimal value. It tries
>>> to increase/ decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
>>>
>>> 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
>>> fails.
>>> 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
>>> pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current number of
>>> blocks.
>>>
>>> Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
>>> is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min =
>>> max = 20.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@nxp.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>>  common/usb_storage.c | 71
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c index
>>> 7e6e52d..eee8f4c 100644
>>> --- a/common/usb_storage.c
>>> +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
>>> @@ -106,10 +106,13 @@ struct us_data {
>>>   * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10) commands
>> are
>>>   * limited to 65535 blocks.
>>>   */
>>> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	4095
>>>  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	65535
>>>  #else
>>> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	20
>>>  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	20
>>>  #endif
>>> +#define USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(n)	(n >= 0 ? ((1 << (12 + (n))) - 1) : 0)
>>
> 
> Hello Marek, 
> 
>> Can this be ever called with n < 0 ? You should make this into a function to get
>> typechecking on it too.
>>
> 
> Yes. When transfer fails for the first time (pos - 1) is passed to this macro. Ok, 
> I will convert it to a function in v3.

This should be handled outside of the macro then.

>>>  #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
>>>  static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV]; @@ -1117,11
>>> +1120,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc *block_dev,
>> lbaint_t blknr,
>>>  	unsigned short smallblks;
>>>  	struct usb_device *udev;
>>>  	struct us_data *ss;
>>> -	int retry;
>>> +	int retry, pos = 0;
>>> +	bool retry_flag = false;
>>>  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
>>>  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
>>>  #endif
>>> +	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>>
>> How will this behave if you keep alternating between two block_dev devices ? It will
>> always start looking for the best possible transfer length from scratch, right ? That's
>> not great ...
> 
> How about adding a field name "cur_xfer_blks" in struct usb_device and updating it 
> on device basis , it will help retain the value.

That might work, yes.

> struct usb_device {
> ...
>         unsigned short cur_xfer_blks;
> };
>   
>>
>>>  	if (blkcnt == 0)
>>>  		return 0;
>>> @@ -1153,26 +1158,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc
>> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>>>  		/* XXX need some comment here */
>>>  		retry = 2;
>>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>> -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
>>> +		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> +			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
>>>  		else
>>>  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
>>>  retry_it:
>>> -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> +		debug("usb_read: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
>>> +		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
>>> +		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>>  			usb_show_progress();
>>>  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
>>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>>  		if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
>>>  			debug("Read ERROR\n");
>>>  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
>>> -			if (retry--)
>>> +			if (retry--) {
>>> +				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> +				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
>>> +				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
>>> +					smallblks = size;
>>> +					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
>>> +					pos--;
>>> +				}
>>> +				retry_flag = true;
>>>  				goto retry_it;
>>
>> What is the reason for having the same code twice in this patch ? Just pull the identical
>> stuff into a function.
>>
> 
> Ok, I will add above code in function namely dec_cur_xfer_blks/ inc_cur_xfer_blks in v3.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Rajesh Bhagat 
> 
>>> +			}
>>>  			blkcnt -= blks;
>>>  			break;
>>>  		}
>>>  		start += smallblks;
>>>  		blks -= smallblks;
>>>  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
>>> +
>>> +		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> +		if (!retry_flag) {
>>> +			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
>>> +			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
>>> +				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
>>> +				pos++;
>>> +			}
>>> +		}
>>>  	} while (blks != 0);
>>>  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>>>
>>> @@ -1181,7 +1206,7 @@ retry_it:
>>>  	      start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>>>
>>>  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
>>> -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> +	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>>  		debug("\n");
>>>  	return blkcnt;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -1199,11 +1224,13 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
>> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>>>  	unsigned short smallblks;
>>>  	struct usb_device *udev;
>>>  	struct us_data *ss;
>>> -	int retry;
>>> +	int retry, pos = 0;
>>> +	bool retry_flag = false;
>>>  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
>>>  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
>>>  #endif
>>> +	unsigned short usb_cur_xfer_blk = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos);
>>>
>>>  	if (blkcnt == 0)
>>>  		return 0;
>>> @@ -1239,26 +1266,46 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct blk_desc
>> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
>>>  		 */
>>>  		retry = 2;
>>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>> -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
>>> +		if (blks > usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>> +			smallblks = usb_cur_xfer_blk;
>>>  		else
>>>  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
>>>  retry_it:
>>> -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> +		debug("usb_write: retry #%d, usb_cur_xfer_blk %hu, smallblks %hu\n",
>>> +		      retry, usb_cur_xfer_blk, smallblks);
>>> +		if (smallblks == usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>>  			usb_show_progress();
>>>  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
>>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
>>>  		if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
>>>  			debug("Write ERROR\n");
>>>  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
>>> -			if (retry--)
>>> +			if (retry--) {
>>> +				/* decrease the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> +				unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos - 1);
>>> +				if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
>>> +					smallblks = size;
>>> +					usb_cur_xfer_blk = smallblks;
>>> +					pos--;
>>> +				}
>>> +				retry_flag = true;
>>>  				goto retry_it;
>>> +			}
>>>  			blkcnt -= blks;
>>>  			break;
>>>  		}
>>>  		start += smallblks;
>>>  		blks -= smallblks;
>>>  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
>>> +
>>> +		/* try to increase the usb_cur_xfer_blk */
>>> +		if (!retry_flag) {
>>> +			unsigned short size = USB_CUR_XFER_BLK(pos + 1);
>>> +			if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
>>> +				usb_cur_xfer_blk = size;
>>> +				pos++;
>>> +			}
>>> +		}
>>>  	} while (blks != 0);
>>>  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
>>>
>>> @@ -1266,7 +1313,7 @@ retry_it:
>>>  	      PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
>>>
>>>  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
>>> -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
>>> +	if (blkcnt >= usb_cur_xfer_blk)
>>>  		debug("\n");
>>>  	return blkcnt;
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Marek Vasut


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-06 13:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-02  4:56 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks Rajesh Bhagat
2016-06-03 22:51 ` Marek Vasut
2016-06-06  4:19   ` Rajesh Bhagat
2016-06-06 13:19     ` Marek Vasut

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.