Re: [PATCH RESEND 05/14] libxl/arm: Construct ACPI GTDT table

[Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>]

On 2016年06月06日 20:04, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > 
>> > On 06/06/16 12:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> > > On Tue, 31 May 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>> > > > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > Construct GTDT table with the interrupt information of timers.
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>>>> > > > ---
>>>> > > >   tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c | 75
>>>> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> > > >   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
>>>> > > > index 9e99159..0fb4f69 100644
>>>> > > > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
>>>> > > > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
>>>> > > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>>> > > >   #include "libxl_libfdt_compat.h"
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > >   #include <xc_dom.h>
>>>> > > > +#include <acpi_defs.h>
>>>> > > >   #include <stdbool.h>
>>>> > > >   #include <libfdt.h>
>>>> > > >   #include <assert.h>
>>>> > > > @@ -880,13 +881,85 @@ out:
>>>> > > >       return rc;
>>>> > > >   }
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > +static void make_acpi_header(struct acpi_table_header *h, const char
>>>> > > > *sig,
>>>> > > > +                             int len, uint8_t rev)
>>>> > > > +{
>>>> > > > +    memcpy(&h->signature, sig, 4);
>>>> > > > +    h->length = len;
>>>> > > > +    h->revision = rev;
>>>> > > > +    memcpy(h->oem_id, ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6, 6);
>>>> > > > +    memcpy(h->oem_table_id, ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME4, 4);
>>>> > > > +    memcpy(h->oem_table_id + 4, sig, 4);
>>>> > > > +    h->oem_revision = 1;
>>>> > > > +    memcpy(h->asl_compiler_id, ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME4, 4);
>>>> > > > +    h->asl_compiler_revision = 1;
>>>> > > > +    h->checksum = 0;
>>>> > > > +}
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +static void make_acpi_gtdt(libxl__gc *gc, struct xc_dom_image *dom)
>>>> > > > +{
>>>> > > > +    struct acpi_gtdt_descriptor *gtdt;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    gtdt = libxl__zalloc(gc, sizeof(*gtdt));
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    gtdt->secure_el1_interrupt = GUEST_TIMER_PHYS_S_PPI;
>>>> > > > +    gtdt->secure_el1_flags = (ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE <<
>>>> > > > ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_MODE)
>>>> > > > +                             |(ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW <<
>>>> > > > ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_POLARITY);
>>>> > > > +    gtdt->non_secure_el1_interrupt = GUEST_TIMER_PHYS_NS_PPI;
>>>> > > > +    gtdt->non_secure_el1_flags =
>>>> > > > +                             (ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE <<
>>>> > > > ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_MODE)
>>>> > > > +                             |(ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW <<
>>>> > > > ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_POLARITY);
>>>> > > > +    gtdt->virtual_timer_interrupt = GUEST_TIMER_VIRT_PPI;
>>>> > > > +    gtdt->virtual_timer_flags =
>>>> > > > +                             (ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE <<
>>>> > > > ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_MODE)
>>>> > > > +                             |(ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW <<
>>>> > > > ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_POLARITY);
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    make_acpi_header(&gtdt->header, "GTDT", sizeof(*gtdt), 2);
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    dom->acpitable_blob->gtdt.table = (void *)gtdt;
>>>> > > > +    /* Align to 64bit. */
>>>> > > > +    dom->acpitable_blob->gtdt.size = sizeof(*gtdt);
>>>> > > > +    dom->acpitable_size += dom->acpitable_blob->gtdt.size;
>>>> > > > +}
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +static int prepare_acpi(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_build_info *info,
>>>> > > > +                        libxl__domain_build_state *state,
>>>> > > > +                        struct xc_dom_image *dom)
>>>> > > > +{
>>>> > > > +    const libxl_version_info *vers;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    /* convenience aliases */
>>>> > > > +    xc_domain_configuration_t *xc_config = &state->config;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    vers = libxl_get_version_info(CTX);
>>>> > > > +    if (vers == NULL)
>>>> > > > +        return ERROR_FAIL;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    LOG(DEBUG, "constructing ACPI tables for Xen version %d.%d guest",
>>>> > > > +        vers->xen_version_major, vers->xen_version_minor);
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    /* Alloc memory for ACPI blob placeholders. */
>>>> > > > +    dom->acpitable_blob = libxl__zalloc(gc, sizeof(struct
>>>> > > > acpitable_blob));
>>>> > > > +    dom->acpitable_size = 0;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    make_acpi_gtdt(gc, dom);
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    return 0;
>>>> > > > +}
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > >   int libxl__arch_domain_init_hw_description(libxl__gc *gc,
>>>> > > >                                              libxl_domain_build_info
>>>> > > > *info,
>>>> > > >                                              libxl__domain_build_state
>>>> > > > *state,
>>>> > > >                                              struct xc_dom_image *dom)
>>>> > > >   {
>>>> > > > +    int rc;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > >       assert(info->type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_PV);
>>>> > > > -    return prepare_dtb(gc, info, state, dom);
>>>> > > > +    rc = prepare_dtb(gc, info, state, dom);
>>>> > > > +    if (rc)
>>>> > > > +        return rc;
>>>> > > > +
>>>> > > > +    return prepare_acpi(gc, info, state, dom);
>>>> > > >   }
>>> > > 
>>> > > ACPI tables for ARM guests should be user configurable: acpi=1 in the VM
>>> > > config file enables them, with default off.
>> > 
>> > The VM system specification for ARM [1] mandates that both ACPI and DT should
>> > be provided and described the entire VM and its peripheral (see the section
>> > "Hardware Description").
>> > 
>> > Furthermore, the user may not know if the guest OS will use ACPI or DT For
>> > instance Redhat is using ACPI whilst Debian is using DT.
>> > 
>> > So we have to provide both by default. However, 32-bit domain should only have
>> > Device-Tree table created.
>> > 
>> > Anyway, the reason should have been described in the commit message. I would
>> > split this patch in two: introducing prepare ACPI and then GTDT table. So we
>> > can provide details in the commit message.
> All right, let me rephrase then: we should have a VMSPEC=on or off to
> enable or disable compliance with the VM system specification for ARM.
> (The good thing about specifications is that there are so many to choose
> from.) With compliance disabled, we can avoid introducing ACPI tables
> for the guest.
> 
> Given that "VMSPEC" is cumbersome, I suggest to introduce a simpler and
> more meaningful alias: "ACPI" :-)
> 
> I am open to discussion on what the default should be, but there needs
> to be a way to disable ACPI.
I don't know why we need to disable ACPI because we can provide ACPI
tables but guest could choose to not use it. And for ARM32 domain, since
the linux guest kernel doesn't support ACPI, even we provide ACPI
tables, it can't use it, anyway.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel