All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdefender.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] vm-event/arm: implement support for control-register write vm-events
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:17:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576AC834.2010701@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bfcf0866-134e-ab41-8c5f-498dc685bb08@bitdefender.com>

On 22/06/16 17:35, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:

> Julien,

Hello Corneliu,

> I was trying to implement having HCR stored in arch_domain or arch_vcpu
> as suggested above and I'm a bit confused about the code in
> p2m_restore_state.
> I'm hoping you can provide some feedback on this matter. Here's the
> current implementation of the function:
>
>      void p2m_restore_state(struct vcpu *n)
>      {
>          register_t hcr;
>
>          hcr = READ_SYSREG(HCR_EL2);
>          WRITE_SYSREG(hcr & ~HCR_VM, HCR_EL2);
>          isb();
>
>          p2m_load_VTTBR(n->domain);
>          isb();
>
>          if ( is_32bit_domain(n->domain) )
>              hcr &= ~HCR_RW;
>          else
>              hcr |= HCR_RW;
>
>          WRITE_SYSREG(n->arch.sctlr, SCTLR_EL1);
>          isb();
>
>          WRITE_SYSREG(hcr, HCR_EL2);
>          isb();
>      }
>
> First of all, I see the HCR_VM bit being unset (=0) but I don't quite
> understand why and even more peculiar is the fact that I couldn't find
> any place where the bit is set (=1) again.

After the first write to HCR_EL2, "hcr" still have the VM bit set as we 
only mask it. So the second write will re-set the VM bit.

I am not sure why the VM bit is unset/set in this function. I am not 
able to find a paragraph justifying it in the ARM ARM. I have CCed some 
ARM folks to check if I missed something.

> Secondly, why this order of operations? More specifically, why is
> p2m_load_VTTBR done after the HCR_VM bit is unset and before the HCR_RW
> bit is set/unset? Can't we write HCR only once here?
> And finally, I see the function is called by construct_dom0. The code
> there looks like:
>
>      /*
>       * The following loads use the domain's p2m and require current to
>       * be a vcpu of the domain, temporarily switch
>       */
>      saved_current = current;
>      p2m_restore_state(v);
>      [...]
>      /* Now that we are done restore the original p2m and current. */
>      set_current(saved_current);
>      p2m_restore_state(saved_current);
>
> I suppose the significant changes p2m_restore_state does for the code in
> between ("[...]") is setting VTTBR & SCTLR which are used by translation
> functions such as gvirt_to_maddr (which seems to use PAR_EL1).
> What I don't grasp is what effect setting the VTTBR has if HCR.HCR_VM is
> unset and left unset...

HCR.VM is not left unset (see why above).

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-16 14:04 [PATCH 0/7] vm-event: Implement ARM support for control-register writes Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] minor (formatting) fixes Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:24   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 19:19     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17  7:06       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 10:46         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:02   ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17  8:33     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17  8:36       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17  9:29         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-17  9:35           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17  9:33         ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17  9:36           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17  9:40             ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17  9:42               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17 19:05           ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-16 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] vm-event: VM_EVENT_FLAG_DENY requires VM_EVENT_FLAG_VCPU_PAUSED Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:11   ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17  8:43     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21 11:26     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21 15:09       ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-22  8:34         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] vm-event: introduce vm_event_vcpu_enter Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:51   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 20:10     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 20:33       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17 10:41         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17  7:17       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 11:13         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 11:27           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 12:13             ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:17   ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17  9:19     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17  8:55   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-17 11:40     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 13:22       ` Julien Grall
2016-06-16 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] vm-event/x86: use vm_event_vcpu_enter properly Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 15:00   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 20:20     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17  7:20       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 11:23         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:27   ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17  9:24     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: replace monitor_write_data.do_write with enum Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] vm-event/arm: move hvm_event_cr->common vm_event_monitor_cr Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 15:16   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17  8:25     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17  8:38       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 11:31         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21  7:08       ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21  7:20         ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-21 15:22           ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-22  6:33             ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 16:55   ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17 10:37     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] vm-event/arm: implement support for control-register write vm-events Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:26   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-16 19:24     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 21:28       ` Julien Grall
2016-06-17 11:46         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:49   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-17 10:36     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 13:18       ` Julien Grall
2016-06-22 16:35       ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-22 17:17         ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-06-22 18:39           ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-22 19:37             ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-22 19:41               ` Julien Grall
2016-06-23  5:31                 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-23  5:49                   ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-23 11:11                     ` Julien Grall
2016-06-24  9:32                       ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-23 11:00           ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576AC834.2010701@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=czuzu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.