All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: tegra: actually program REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:49:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57753F94.3000301@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160630134728.GE26758@ulmo.ba.sec>

On 06/30/2016 07:47 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:37:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> On recent SoCs, tegra_pcie_phy_enable() isn't called; but instead
>> tegra_pcie_enable_controller() calls tegra_xusb_phy_enable(). However,
>> part of tegra_pcie_phy_enable() needs to happen in all cases. Move that
>> code to tegra_pcie_port_enable() instead.
>>
>> For reference, NVIDIA's downstream Linux kernel performs this operation
>> in tegra_pcie_enable_rp_features(), which is called immediately after
>> tegra_pcie_port_enable(). Since that function doesn't exist in the mainline
>> driver, we'll just add it to the tail of tegra_pcie_port_enable() instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
>> index 74887fedc3d4..2ec64a9e7943 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
>> @@ -541,12 +541,13 @@ static void tegra_pcie_port_reset(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>>
>>   static void tegra_pcie_port_enable(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>>   {
>> -	const struct tegra_pcie_soc_data *soc = port->pcie->soc_data;
>> +	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = port->pcie;
>> +	const struct tegra_pcie_soc_data *soc = pcie->soc_data;
>>   	unsigned long ctrl = tegra_pcie_port_get_pex_ctrl(port);
>>   	unsigned long value;
>>
>>   	/* enable reference clock */
>> -	value = afi_readl(port->pcie, ctrl);
>> +	value = afi_readl(pcie, ctrl);
>>   	value |= AFI_PEX_CTRL_REFCLK_EN;
>>
>>   	if (soc->has_pex_clkreq_en)
>> @@ -554,9 +555,14 @@ static void tegra_pcie_port_enable(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>>
>>   	value |= AFI_PEX_CTRL_OVERRIDE_EN;
>>
>> -	afi_writel(port->pcie, value, ctrl);
>> +	afi_writel(pcie, value, ctrl);
>>
>>   	tegra_pcie_port_reset(port);
>> +
>> +	/* Configure the reference clock driver */
>> +	pads_writel(pcie, soc->pads_refclk_cfg0, PADS_REFCLK_CFG0);
>> +	if (soc->num_ports > 2)
>> +		pads_writel(pcie, soc->pads_refclk_cfg1, PADS_REFCLK_CFG1);
>>   }
>
> This will actually write these two registers for each enabled port,
> which, while it shouldn't make a difference, is unnecessary. I've
> applied a slightly modified version of this patch. Specifically I moved
> this code to the tail of the tegra_pcie_phy_power_on() function, which
> is closest to where it was before.
>
> I've also applied the patch that changes the values that are written
> into this register, though I reversed the order because that made more
> sense to me. I've pushed both patches to the for-4.8/pci branch in the
> Tegra tree, can you please take a look if that still looks okay to you?

I think that will work. It's a pity the code location in the mainline 
kernel is going to diverge from the downstream kernel and U-Boot though.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pci: tegra: actually program REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:49:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57753F94.3000301@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160630134728.GE26758@ulmo.ba.sec>

On 06/30/2016 07:47 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:37:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> On recent SoCs, tegra_pcie_phy_enable() isn't called; but instead
>> tegra_pcie_enable_controller() calls tegra_xusb_phy_enable(). However,
>> part of tegra_pcie_phy_enable() needs to happen in all cases. Move that
>> code to tegra_pcie_port_enable() instead.
>>
>> For reference, NVIDIA's downstream Linux kernel performs this operation
>> in tegra_pcie_enable_rp_features(), which is called immediately after
>> tegra_pcie_port_enable(). Since that function doesn't exist in the mainline
>> driver, we'll just add it to the tail of tegra_pcie_port_enable() instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
>> index 74887fedc3d4..2ec64a9e7943 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
>> @@ -541,12 +541,13 @@ static void tegra_pcie_port_reset(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>>
>>   static void tegra_pcie_port_enable(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>>   {
>> -	const struct tegra_pcie_soc_data *soc = port->pcie->soc_data;
>> +	struct tegra_pcie *pcie = port->pcie;
>> +	const struct tegra_pcie_soc_data *soc = pcie->soc_data;
>>   	unsigned long ctrl = tegra_pcie_port_get_pex_ctrl(port);
>>   	unsigned long value;
>>
>>   	/* enable reference clock */
>> -	value = afi_readl(port->pcie, ctrl);
>> +	value = afi_readl(pcie, ctrl);
>>   	value |= AFI_PEX_CTRL_REFCLK_EN;
>>
>>   	if (soc->has_pex_clkreq_en)
>> @@ -554,9 +555,14 @@ static void tegra_pcie_port_enable(struct tegra_pcie_port *port)
>>
>>   	value |= AFI_PEX_CTRL_OVERRIDE_EN;
>>
>> -	afi_writel(port->pcie, value, ctrl);
>> +	afi_writel(pcie, value, ctrl);
>>
>>   	tegra_pcie_port_reset(port);
>> +
>> +	/* Configure the reference clock driver */
>> +	pads_writel(pcie, soc->pads_refclk_cfg0, PADS_REFCLK_CFG0);
>> +	if (soc->num_ports > 2)
>> +		pads_writel(pcie, soc->pads_refclk_cfg1, PADS_REFCLK_CFG1);
>>   }
>
> This will actually write these two registers for each enabled port,
> which, while it shouldn't make a difference, is unnecessary. I've
> applied a slightly modified version of this patch. Specifically I moved
> this code to the tail of the tegra_pcie_phy_power_on() function, which
> is closest to where it was before.
>
> I've also applied the patch that changes the values that are written
> into this register, though I reversed the order because that made more
> sense to me. I've pushed both patches to the for-4.8/pci branch in the
> Tegra tree, can you please take a look if that still looks okay to you?

I think that will work. It's a pity the code location in the mainline 
kernel is going to diverge from the downstream kernel and U-Boot though.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-30 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-24 14:37 [PATCH] pci: tegra: actually program REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs Stephen Warren
2016-06-24 14:37 ` Stephen Warren
     [not found] ` <20160624143703.13231-1-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-26  2:54   ` Simon Glass
2016-06-26  2:54     ` Simon Glass
2016-06-30 13:47 ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-30 13:47   ` Thierry Reding
2016-06-30 15:49   ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2016-06-30 15:49     ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57753F94.3000301@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.