All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
	will.deacon@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:58:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577C8FE3.3010208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+CxQMSrg69p2Xey829Mz4Au9YCai+4JD17i9urdbj0VgkQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, wanpeng

On 2016年07月05日 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Xinhui,
> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
>> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
>> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
>> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break
>> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted.
>>
>> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it.
>>
>> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same
>> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as
>> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on
>> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type.
>
> Lock holder vCPU preemption can be detected by hardware pSeries or
> paravirt method?
>
There is one shard struct between kernel and powerVM/KVM. And we read the yield_count of this struct to detect if one vcpu is running or not.
SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is set by powerVM/KVM.
and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)

I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get such vcpu preemption info?

thanks
xinui
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:58:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577C8FE3.3010208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+CxQMSrg69p2Xey829Mz4Au9YCai+4JD17i9urdbj0VgkQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, wanpeng

On 2016年07月05日 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi Xinhui,
> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
>> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
>> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
>> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break
>> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted.
>>
>> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it.
>>
>> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same
>> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as
>> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on
>> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type.
>
> Lock holder vCPU preemption can be detected by hardware pSeries or
> paravirt method?
>
There is one shard struct between kernel and powerVM/KVM. And we read the yield_count of this struct to detect if one vcpu is running or not.
SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is set by powerVM/KVM.
and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)

I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get such vcpu preemption info?

thanks
xinui
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-06  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-28 14:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43   ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43   ` Pan Xinhui
2016-07-05  9:57   ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-05  9:57   ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06  4:58     ` xinhui [this message]
2016-07-06  4:58       ` xinhui
2016-07-06  6:46       ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06  6:46         ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06  6:46         ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06  7:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06  7:58           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06  8:32           ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06  8:32             ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 10:18             ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:18               ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:54   ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-06 10:54     ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-06 10:54     ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-15 15:35     ` Pan Xinhui
2016-07-15 15:35     ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex, rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43   ` Pan Xinhui
2016-07-06  6:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06  6:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06  7:47   ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06  7:47     ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06  8:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06  8:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06  8:38       ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06  8:38         ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 12:44       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 12:44         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 16:56       ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 16:56         ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 16:56         ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 10:05   ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:05     ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 11:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 11:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 12:08     ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 12:08       ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 12:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 12:28         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 13:03         ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 13:03           ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07  8:48         ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07  8:48           ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07  9:42           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07  9:42             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 10:12             ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:12               ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:27               ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:27                 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 11:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:15                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:08               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:08                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:09             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:09               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-11 15:10   ` Waiman Long
2016-07-11 15:10     ` Waiman Long
2016-07-11 15:10     ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12  4:16     ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-12  4:16     ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-12 18:16       ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12 18:16         ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12 18:16         ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577C8FE3.3010208@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.