All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Perrot" <thomas.perrot@bootlin.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:37:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <579bc869055ebf299c3270d890db41a7bb2ceabb.camel@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YRAuMiM44mQ/oMnM@piout.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3893 bytes --]

Hello Alexandre,

On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 21:19 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 06/08/2021 18:10:38+0200, Thomas Perrot wrote:
> > Otherwise the "required" property, from UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set
> > to "conf"
> > and no error will be raised in case of error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > --
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > index a9d1002200c9..72f692e40e63 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ FIT_DESC ?= "Kernel fitImage for
> > ${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}"
> >  # Sign individual images as well
> >  FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL ?= "0"
> >  
> > +# Keys used to sign individually images nodes.
> > +# The keys to sign images nodes must be different from those used to
> > sign
> > +# configurations nodes, otherwise the "required" property, from
> > +# UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf", because "conf" prevails
> > on "image".
> > +# Then images signature checking will not be mandatory and no error
> > will be
> > +# raised.
> > +# UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME = "dev2" # keys name in keydir (eg.
> > "dev2.crt", "dev2.key")
> > +
> >  #
> >  # Emit the fitImage ITS header
> >  #
> > @@ -121,7 +129,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_kernel() {
> >  
> >         kernel_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         kernel_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >         ENTRYPOINT="${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}"
> >         if [ -n "${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}" ]; then
> > @@ -167,7 +175,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_dtb() {
> >  
> >         dtb_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         dtb_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >         dtb_loadline=""
> >         dtb_ext=${DTB##*.}
> > @@ -214,7 +222,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_boot_script() {
> >  
> >          bootscr_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         bootscr_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >          cat << EOF >> ${1}
> >                  bootscr-${2} {
> > @@ -278,7 +286,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_ramdisk() {
> >  
> >         ramdisk_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         ramdisk_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >         ramdisk_loadline=""
> >         ramdisk_entryline=""
> >  
> > @@ -475,6 +483,10 @@ fitimage_assemble() {
> >         bootscr_id=""
> >         rm -f ${1} arch/${ARCH}/boot/${2}
> >  
> > +       if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}" = "${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}" ];
> > then
> > +               bbfatal "Keys used to sign images and configuration
> > nodes must be different."
> 
> This breaks oe-selftest, as seen in:
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/2383/steps/14/logs/stdio
> 

Thank you for the feedback.

The tests also need to be updated, so I will submit a v2, including the
required changes on the test side.

Best regards,
Thomas Perrot

> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Perrot, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 673 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06 16:10 [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations Thomas Perrot
2021-08-08 19:19 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-09  8:37   ` Thomas Perrot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=579bc869055ebf299c3270d890db41a7bb2ceabb.camel@bootlin.com \
    --to=thomas.perrot@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.