* releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
@ 2016-08-19 5:27 Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
Hi Sage,
Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 5:27 releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Loic Dachary
@ 2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
2016-08-19 10:37 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2016-08-21 20:27 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 11:49 ` Radoslaw Zarzynski
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: wido @ 2016-08-19 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Sage Weil, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
Wido
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
@ 2016-08-19 10:37 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2016-08-19 11:00 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-21 20:27 ` Loic Dachary
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre DERUMIER @ 2016-08-19 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wido den Hollander; +Cc: Loic Dachary, Sage Weil, ceph-devel, Abhishek Varshney
Hi,
Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd:
"jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map"
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867
"jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869
Alexandre
----- Mail original -----
De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
Wido
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 10:37 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
@ 2016-08-19 11:00 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 11:09 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre DERUMIER, Wido den Hollander
Cc: Sage Weil, ceph-devel, Abhishek Varshney
Hi Alexandre,
On 19/08/2016 12:37, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd:
>
> "jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867
I think it will be merged before 10.2.3 is released.
>
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869
This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.
Cheers
>
> Alexandre
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
> À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
> Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05
> Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
>
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
>
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
>
> Wido
>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 11:00 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-08-19 11:09 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2016-08-21 14:43 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre DERUMIER @ 2016-08-19 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Wido den Hollander, Sage Weil, ceph-devel, Abhishek Varshney
>>If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.
Ok, thanks ! I'll try to do it Monday.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
À: "aderumier" <aderumier@odiso.com>, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 13:00:44
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
Hi Alexandre,
On 19/08/2016 12:37, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd:
>
> "jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867
I think it will be merged before 10.2.3 is released.
>
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869
This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.
Cheers
>
> Alexandre
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
> À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
> Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05
> Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
>
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
>
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
>
> Wido
>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 5:27 releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
@ 2016-08-19 11:49 ` Radoslaw Zarzynski
2016-08-19 12:34 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 13:05 ` Mykola Golub
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Radoslaw Zarzynski @ 2016-08-19 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Sage Weil, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
Hello,
I'd love to see RadosGW v10.2.3 passing RefStack:
* jewel: rgw: Swift's object versioning doesn't support
restoring a previous version on DELETE
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16393
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10710
Regards,
Radek
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 11:49 ` Radoslaw Zarzynski
@ 2016-08-19 12:34 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Radoslaw Zarzynski; +Cc: Ceph Development
Hi,
On 19/08/2016 13:49, Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd love to see RadosGW v10.2.3 passing RefStack:
>
> * jewel: rgw: Swift's object versioning doesn't support
> restoring a previous version on DELETE
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16393
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10710
It is scheduled to be tested
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27
http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-17_11:24:55-rgw-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/
as part of the current integration branch
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-23
If we're lucky (i.e. no infrastructure troubles and no rgw pull request disrupt the test in bizarre ways) it will be ready to merge early next week.
Cheers
>
> Regards,
> Radek
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 5:27 releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
2016-08-19 11:49 ` Radoslaw Zarzynski
@ 2016-08-19 13:05 ` Mykola Golub
2016-08-19 13:25 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 13:57 ` Sage Weil
2016-08-22 9:59 ` Fabian Grünbichler
4 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mykola Golub @ 2016-08-19 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Sage Weil, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
Loic,
I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
before the release:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Mykola Golub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 13:05 ` Mykola Golub
@ 2016-08-19 13:25 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 14:01 ` Mykola Golub
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mykola Golub; +Cc: Ceph Development
Hi Mykola,
On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
> Loic,
>
> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
> before the release:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
>
> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
Cheers
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 5:27 releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Loic Dachary
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-08-19 13:05 ` Mykola Golub
@ 2016-08-19 13:57 ` Sage Weil
2016-08-19 14:44 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-22 9:59 ` Fabian Grünbichler
4 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2016-08-19 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
It's certainly time for another point release (the last one was mid-
June). I think it can wait another couple days though to get all/most of
the issues people have called out in too?
Thanks!
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 13:25 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-08-19 14:01 ` Mykola Golub
2016-08-19 14:43 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mykola Golub @ 2016-08-19 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development
"convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
part of this PR:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
backported too:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
conflict. This would ease further backporting.
I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend. Do we have a
deadline?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Mykola,
>
> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
> > Loic,
> >
> > I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
> > before the release:
> >
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
> >
> > I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
>
> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
>
> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
>
> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
>
> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
>
> Cheers
>
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >> Hi Sage,
> >>
> >> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> >> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> >>
> >> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> --
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Mykola Golub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 14:01 ` Mykola Golub
@ 2016-08-19 14:43 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 20:16 ` Mykola Golub
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mykola Golub; +Cc: Ceph Development
On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote:
> "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
> part of this PR:
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
>
> which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
> backported too:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
>
> I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
> conflict. This would ease further backporting.
That makes sense.
> I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend.
It would be great, thank you !
> Do we have a deadline?
Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway.
Cheers
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Mykola,
>>
>> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
>>> Loic,
>>>
>>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
>>> before the release:
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
>>>
>>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
>>
>> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
>>
>> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
>>
>> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
>>
>> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>
>>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>>>
>>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 13:57 ` Sage Weil
@ 2016-08-19 14:44 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Ceph Development
On 19/08/2016 15:57, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
> It's certainly time for another point release (the last one was mid-
> June). I think it can wait another couple days though to get all/most of
> the issues people have called out in too?
Sure.
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 14:43 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-08-19 20:16 ` Mykola Golub
2016-08-19 20:32 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Mykola Golub @ 2016-08-19 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Jason Dillaman
Loic, I have created backport PRs:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10797
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10798
It is not tested yet though. I will be able to start testing tomorrow.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:43:25PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
> On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote:
> > "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
> > part of this PR:
> >
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
> >
> > which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
> > backported too:
> >
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
> >
> > I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
> > conflict. This would ease further backporting.
>
> That makes sense.
>
> > I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend.
>
> It would be great, thank you !
>
> > Do we have a deadline?
>
> Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway.
>
> Cheers
>
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >> Hi Mykola,
> >>
> >> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
> >>> Loic,
> >>>
> >>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
> >>> before the release:
> >>>
> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
> >>>
> >>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
> >>
> >> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
> >>
> >> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
> >>
> >> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
> >>
> >> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >>>> Hi Sage,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> >>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Mykola Golub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 20:16 ` Mykola Golub
@ 2016-08-19 20:32 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-19 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mykola Golub; +Cc: Ceph Development
Excellent, thanks !
On 19/08/2016 22:16, Mykola Golub wrote:
> Loic, I have created backport PRs:
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10797
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10798
>
> It is not tested yet though. I will be able to start testing tomorrow.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:43:25PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote:
>>> "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
>>> part of this PR:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
>>>
>>> which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
>>> backported too:
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
>>>
>>> I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
>>> conflict. This would ease further backporting.
>>
>> That makes sense.
>>
>>> I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend.
>>
>> It would be great, thank you !
>>
>>> Do we have a deadline?
>>
>> Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>> Hi Mykola,
>>>>
>>>> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
>>>>> Loic,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
>>>>> before the release:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
>>>>>
>>>>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
>>>>
>>>> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
>>>>
>>>> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
>>>>
>>>> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
>>>>
>>>> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>>>>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 11:09 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
@ 2016-08-21 14:43 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre DERUMIER @ 2016-08-21 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Wido den Hollander, Sage Weil, ceph-devel, Abhishek Varshney
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869
>>This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.
Ok, I have tested the backport, and it's working fine now ! Thanks !
----- Mail original -----
De: "aderumier" <aderumier@odiso.com>
À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
Cc: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>, "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 13:09:36
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
>>If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.
Ok, thanks ! I'll try to do it Monday.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
À: "aderumier" <aderumier@odiso.com>, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 13:00:44
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
Hi Alexandre,
On 19/08/2016 12:37, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd:
>
> "jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867
I think it will be merged before 10.2.3 is released.
>
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869
This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.
Cheers
>
> Alexandre
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
> À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
> Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05
> Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
>
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
>
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
>
> Wido
>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
2016-08-19 10:37 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
@ 2016-08-21 20:27 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-22 4:35 ` Kefu Chai
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-21 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wido, Kefu Chai; +Cc: Ceph Development
Hi Wido,
Almost all pull requests requested for 10.2.3 are merged except this one. There is a backport at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10804 . It will need testing and it may take some time.
@Kefu Is there a job we can run to verify it does the right thing in jewel ?
Cheers
On 19/08/2016 09:18, wido@42on.com wrote:
>
>
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
>
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
>
> Wido
>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-21 20:27 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-08-22 4:35 ` Kefu Chai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Kefu Chai @ 2016-08-22 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: wido, Ceph Development, Samuel Just
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
> To: wido@42on.com, "Kefu Chai" <kchai@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 4:27:52 AM
> Subject: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Almost all pull requests requested for 10.2.3 are merged except this one.
> There is a backport at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10804 . It will
> need testing and it may take some time.
>
> @Kefu Is there a job we can run to verify it does the right thing in jewel ?
>
we do exercise "ceph osd pause" in workunit/cephtool[1], but we don't thrash
osds in the test suite[2] that testing this command.
@Sam, how about adding "ceph osd {pause,unpause}" calls to Thrasher in ceph_manager.py,
so the thrashosd tests can test it as well?
--
[1] suites/rados/singleton/all/cephtool.yaml
[2] suites/rados/singleton/
> Cheers
>
> On 19/08/2016 09:18, wido@42on.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het
> >> volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >> Hi Sage,
> >>
> >> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to
> >> release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> >> And here is the backport queue :
> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> >>
> >> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> >>
> >
> > I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4
> > can take a while.
> >
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 /
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
> >
> > Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are
> > not coming up.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> --
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-19 5:27 releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Loic Dachary
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-08-19 13:57 ` Sage Weil
@ 2016-08-22 9:59 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2016-08-22 10:18 ` Loic Dachary
4 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Grünbichler @ 2016-08-22 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
We'd like to also see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16255 included if
possible, as it currently blocks upgrades to Jewel for existing
installations.
Regards,
Fabian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
2016-08-22 9:59 ` Fabian Grünbichler
@ 2016-08-22 10:18 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-22 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabian Grünbichler, ceph-devel
Hi Fabian,
Since it has not yet been merged in master yet there is little chance the backport will make it to 10.2.3. It would be nice to document a workaround in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16255 in the meantime.
Cheers
On 22/08/2016 11:59, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>
> We'd like to also see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16255 included if
> possible, as it currently blocks upgrades to Jewel for existing
> installations.
>
> Regards,
> Fabian
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-22 10:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-19 5:27 releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 7:18 ` wido
2016-08-19 10:37 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2016-08-19 11:00 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 11:09 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2016-08-21 14:43 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2016-08-21 20:27 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-22 4:35 ` Kefu Chai
2016-08-19 11:49 ` Radoslaw Zarzynski
2016-08-19 12:34 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 13:05 ` Mykola Golub
2016-08-19 13:25 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 14:01 ` Mykola Golub
2016-08-19 14:43 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 20:16 ` Mykola Golub
2016-08-19 20:32 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-19 13:57 ` Sage Weil
2016-08-19 14:44 ` Loic Dachary
2016-08-22 9:59 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2016-08-22 10:18 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.