openbmc test work group - wiki

openbmc test work group - wiki

[Sivas Srr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1566 bytes --]

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[krtaylor]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 741 bytes --]

On 7/19/18 10:47 PM, Sivas Srr wrote:
> Hi All,
> Have https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Test-work---group created 
> this page in our
> wiki for upcoming test work group. Please review and provide your 
> inputs / raise questions if you need any clarification.

Thanks Sivas! I'll join and help however I can. When would be a good 
time for a kickoff meeting?

It looks like the initial list is a good summary, where do we start, 
what is the most painful thing to fix? Also, is there room for remote 
(third-party) CI testing in this WG?

Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)

> Sivas R. S
> E-mail: sivas.srr@in.ibm.com <mailto:sivas.srr@in.ibm.com>
> Automation is good, Identifying Defect earlier is better always
> 9902233500
> 08046678273
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3444 bytes --]

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[Andrew Geissler]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM krtaylor <kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/19/18 10:47 PM, Sivas Srr wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Have https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Test-work---group  created this page in our
> wiki for upcoming test work group. Please review and provide your inputs / raise questions if you need any clarification.
>
>
> Thanks Sivas! I'll join and help however I can. When would be a good time for a kickoff meeting?
>
> It looks like the initial list is a good summary, where do we start, what is the most painful thing to fix? Also, is there room for remote (third-party) CI testing in this WG?

Second this one, Brad and I were just chatting a bit on this the other
day, how could we scale the HW CI testing with third parties.  Would
def like it if we could discuss within this WG (and any other
improvements to our CI process)

>
> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
>
> Sivas R. S
> E-mail: sivas.srr@in.ibm.com
>
> Automation is good, Identifying Defect earlier is better always
> 9902233500
> 08046678273
>
>

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[Sivas Srr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 5758 bytes --]

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[Nancy Yuen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2735 bytes --]

Please include me when you have the kick off meeting

Thanks,

----------
Nancy

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Sivas Srr <sivas.srr@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thank you Brad Bishop (For offline review),  Kurt Taylor and Andrew
> Geissler for your kind support.
>
> Yes CI can be included.
> ( In my opinion, If we want to do good CI, we may have to do more left
> shift from CT bucket
> as well). Dynamic CI, It should be. If major code drop associate with a
> feature/Area,
> then test bucket of that CT bucket should be executed as part of CI. We
> can discuss on this.
>
> For eg. IPMI user management features getting enabled then entire IPMI
> bucket can be run part of CI.
>
> Test work group meeting:
>
> As test based on release planning, Would like to have this meeting  either
> on the same day after the release plan meeting or a day after the release
> plan meeting.
>
> Currently release plan meeting happens on Thursday 3 PM CST.
> Proposal to have test work group meeting is either on Thursday evening 7
> or 8 PM CST.
>
> Thank you again for all your inputs.
>
>
>
> Sivas R. S
> E-mail: sivas.srr@in.ibm.com
> E2E FSP Test Architecture, OpenBMC Test Lead, Lab Management
> Automation is good, Identifying Defect earlier is better always
> 9902233500
> 08046678273
>
>
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com>
> Sent by: "openbmc" <openbmc-bounces+sivas.srr=in.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org>
> To: Kurt Taylor <kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com>
> Cc: OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: openbmc test work group - wiki
> Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:12 PM
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM krtaylor <kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/19/18 10:47 PM, Sivas Srr wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Have https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Test-work---group  created
> this page in our
> > wiki for upcoming test work group. Please review and provide your inputs
> / raise questions if you need any clarification.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Sivas! I'll join and help however I can. When would be a good
> time for a kickoff meeting?
> >
> > It looks like the initial list is a good summary, where do we start,
> what is the most painful thing to fix? Also, is there room for remote
> (third-party) CI testing in this WG?
>
> Second this one, Brad and I were just chatting a bit on this the other
> day, how could we scale the HW CI testing with third parties.  Would
> def like it if we could discuss within this WG (and any other
> improvements to our CI process)
>
> >
> > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
> >
> > Sivas R. S
> > E-mail: sivas.srr@in.ibm.com
> >
> > Automation is good, Identifying Defect earlier is better always
> > 9902233500
> > 08046678273
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6678 bytes --]

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[Sivas Srr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 8605 bytes --]

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[Sivas Srr]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 10343 bytes --]

Re: openbmc test work group - wiki

[Brad Bishop]

> On Jul 30, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Sivas Srr <sivas.srr@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brad Bishop,
>  
> Had sent a mail from google email account to our community  with the google poll
> link ( https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScYu8fPprtqF2EvxWkL-_cLVHHu_FBFBtQ0dLtib3E68akv-A/viewform ) and it seems waiting for your approval.
>  
> Have requested our team to check it and works fine.
>  
> Could you pls approve the same.

Hi Sivas

I filled out the poll.  Is that all you were looking for here?

thx -brad

>  
> Sivas R. S