[PATCH 0/2] regulator: s2mps11: Fine-tuning for s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[PATCH 0/2] regulator: s2mps11: Fine-tuning for s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:55:22 +0200

Two update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (2):
  Use kcalloc()
  Use devm_kmalloc_array()

 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 0/2] regulator: s2mps11: Fine-tuning for s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:55:22 +0200

Two update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (2):
  Use kcalloc()
  Use devm_kmalloc_array()

 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 1/2] regulator: s2mps11: Use kcalloc() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:00:35 +0200

A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
Thus use the corresponding function "kcalloc".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
index 7726b874e539..b4e588cce03d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	rdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdata) * rdev_num, GFP_KERNEL);
+	rdata = kcalloc(rdev_num, sizeof(*rdata), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!rdata)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 1/2] regulator: s2mps11: Use kcalloc() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:00:35 +0200

A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
Thus use the corresponding function "kcalloc".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
index 7726b874e539..b4e588cce03d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	rdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdata) * rdev_num, GFP_KERNEL);
+	rdata = kcalloc(rdev_num, sizeof(*rdata), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!rdata)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 2/2] regulator: s2mps11: Use devm_kmalloc_array() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:40:19 +0200

A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
Thus use the corresponding function "devm_kmalloc_array".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
index b4e588cce03d..b397a2e0bcd1 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
@@ -1139,9 +1139,11 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	s2mps11->ext_control_gpio = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev,
-			sizeof(*s2mps11->ext_control_gpio) * rdev_num,
-			GFP_KERNEL);
+	s2mps11->ext_control_gpio
+		= devm_kmalloc_array(&pdev->dev,
+				     rdev_num,
+				     sizeof(*s2mps11->ext_control_gpio),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!s2mps11->ext_control_gpio)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	/*
-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 2/2] regulator: s2mps11: Use devm_kmalloc_array() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:40:19 +0200

A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
Thus use the corresponding function "devm_kmalloc_array".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
index b4e588cce03d..b397a2e0bcd1 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
@@ -1139,9 +1139,11 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	s2mps11->ext_control_gpio = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev,
-			sizeof(*s2mps11->ext_control_gpio) * rdev_num,
-			GFP_KERNEL);
+	s2mps11->ext_control_gpio
+		= devm_kmalloc_array(&pdev->dev,
+				     rdev_num,
+				     sizeof(*s2mps11->ext_control_gpio),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!s2mps11->ext_control_gpio)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	/*
-- 
2.12.2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: s2mps11: Use kcalloc() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:01:25PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:00:35 +0200
> 
> A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding function "kcalloc".
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Unfortunately you write mostly cryptic commit messages. This does not
answer for the main question - why this change is needed. Code looks
okay, but you should explain in simple words why this is needed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
> index 7726b874e539..b4e588cce03d 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	rdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdata) * rdev_num, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	rdata = kcalloc(rdev_num, sizeof(*rdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!rdata)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -- 
> 2.12.2
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: s2mps11: Use kcalloc() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:01:25PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:00:35 +0200
> 
> A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding function "kcalloc".
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Unfortunately you write mostly cryptic commit messages. This does not
answer for the main question - why this change is needed. Code looks
okay, but you should explain in simple words why this is needed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
> index 7726b874e539..b4e588cce03d 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int s2mps11_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	rdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdata) * rdev_num, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	rdata = kcalloc(rdev_num, sizeof(*rdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!rdata)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -- 
> 2.12.2
> 

Re: regulator: s2mps11: Use kcalloc() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

>> A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>> Thus use the corresponding function "kcalloc".
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Unfortunately you write mostly cryptic commit messages.

Thanks for your feedback.


> This does not answer for the main question - why this change is needed.

My update suggestion affects an aspect for the coding style.


> Code looks okay,

There can be different opinions about related implementation details.


> but you should explain in simple words why this is needed.

Do you find the following wording from the script “checkpatch.pl”
better to understand?

WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply


Regards,
Markus

Re: regulator: s2mps11: Use kcalloc() in s2mps11_pmic_probe()

[SF Markus Elfring]

>> A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>> Thus use the corresponding function "kcalloc".
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Unfortunately you write mostly cryptic commit messages.

Thanks for your feedback.


> This does not answer for the main question - why this change is needed.

My update suggestion affects an aspect for the coding style.


> Code looks okay,

There can be different opinions about related implementation details.


> but you should explain in simple words why this is needed.

Do you find the following wording from the script “checkpatch.pl”
better to understand?

WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply


Regards,
Markus