All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize()
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:27:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ffa62b-76da-c643-fa68-aed92b1e92e0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325130332.778208-5-thierry.reding@gmail.com>

On 2021-03-25 13:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Implement a ->probe_finalize() callback that can be used by vendor
> implementations to perform extra programming necessary after devices
> have been attached to the SMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d8c6bfde6a61..4589e76543a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1447,6 +1447,22 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
>   }
>   
> +static void arm_smmu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> +
> +	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
> +		return;

I think we can trust the IOMMU core not to call things in the wrong 
order, and if the fwspec has changed since it was validated in 
.probe_device then the world is probably on fire anyway.

Robin.

> +
> +	cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	smmu = cfg->smmu;
> +
> +	if (smmu->impl->probe_finalize)
> +		smmu->impl->probe_finalize(smmu, dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> @@ -1630,6 +1646,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
>   	.iova_to_phys		= arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
>   	.probe_device		= arm_smmu_probe_device,
>   	.release_device		= arm_smmu_release_device,
> +	.probe_finalize		= arm_smmu_probe_finalize,
>   	.device_group		= arm_smmu_device_group,
>   	.domain_get_attr	= arm_smmu_domain_get_attr,
>   	.domain_set_attr	= arm_smmu_domain_set_attr,
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index d2a2d1bc58ba..6779db30cebb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   				  struct device *dev, int start);
>   	void (*write_s2cr)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx);
>   	void (*write_sctlr)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx, u32 reg);
> +	void (*probe_finalize)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct device *dev);
>   };
>   
>   #define INVALID_SMENDX			-1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,  Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize()
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:27:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ffa62b-76da-c643-fa68-aed92b1e92e0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325130332.778208-5-thierry.reding@gmail.com>

On 2021-03-25 13:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Implement a ->probe_finalize() callback that can be used by vendor
> implementations to perform extra programming necessary after devices
> have been attached to the SMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d8c6bfde6a61..4589e76543a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1447,6 +1447,22 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
>   }
>   
> +static void arm_smmu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> +
> +	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
> +		return;

I think we can trust the IOMMU core not to call things in the wrong 
order, and if the fwspec has changed since it was validated in 
.probe_device then the world is probably on fire anyway.

Robin.

> +
> +	cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	smmu = cfg->smmu;
> +
> +	if (smmu->impl->probe_finalize)
> +		smmu->impl->probe_finalize(smmu, dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> @@ -1630,6 +1646,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
>   	.iova_to_phys		= arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
>   	.probe_device		= arm_smmu_probe_device,
>   	.release_device		= arm_smmu_release_device,
> +	.probe_finalize		= arm_smmu_probe_finalize,
>   	.device_group		= arm_smmu_device_group,
>   	.domain_get_attr	= arm_smmu_domain_get_attr,
>   	.domain_set_attr	= arm_smmu_domain_set_attr,
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index d2a2d1bc58ba..6779db30cebb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   				  struct device *dev, int start);
>   	void (*write_s2cr)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx);
>   	void (*write_sctlr)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx, u32 reg);
> +	void (*probe_finalize)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct device *dev);
>   };
>   
>   #define INVALID_SMENDX			-1
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,  Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize()
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:27:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57ffa62b-76da-c643-fa68-aed92b1e92e0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325130332.778208-5-thierry.reding@gmail.com>

On 2021-03-25 13:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Implement a ->probe_finalize() callback that can be used by vendor
> implementations to perform extra programming necessary after devices
> have been attached to the SMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d8c6bfde6a61..4589e76543a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1447,6 +1447,22 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
>   }
>   
> +static void arm_smmu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> +
> +	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
> +		return;

I think we can trust the IOMMU core not to call things in the wrong 
order, and if the fwspec has changed since it was validated in 
.probe_device then the world is probably on fire anyway.

Robin.

> +
> +	cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	smmu = cfg->smmu;
> +
> +	if (smmu->impl->probe_finalize)
> +		smmu->impl->probe_finalize(smmu, dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> @@ -1630,6 +1646,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
>   	.iova_to_phys		= arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
>   	.probe_device		= arm_smmu_probe_device,
>   	.release_device		= arm_smmu_release_device,
> +	.probe_finalize		= arm_smmu_probe_finalize,
>   	.device_group		= arm_smmu_device_group,
>   	.domain_get_attr	= arm_smmu_domain_get_attr,
>   	.domain_set_attr	= arm_smmu_domain_set_attr,
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index d2a2d1bc58ba..6779db30cebb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   				  struct device *dev, int start);
>   	void (*write_s2cr)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx);
>   	void (*write_sctlr)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx, u32 reg);
> +	void (*probe_finalize)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct device *dev);
>   };
>   
>   #define INVALID_SMENDX			-1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25 13:03 [PATCH 0/9] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] memory: tegra: Move internal data structures into separate header Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 15:12   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 15:12     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 15:12     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 15:52     ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 15:52       ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 15:52       ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 16:11       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 16:11         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 16:11         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 13:21         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 13:21           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 13:21           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] memory: tegra: Add memory client IDs to tables Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] memory: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27   ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 15:02     ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 15:02       ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 15:02       ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize() Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Detect number of instances at runtime Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27   ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Use Tegra implementation on Tegra186 Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27   ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 14:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: tegra: Hook up memory controller to SMMU " Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: tegra: Enable SMMU support on Tegra194 Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-26 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/9] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 15:29   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 15:29   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 16:35   ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-26 16:35     ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-26 16:35     ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-26 16:55     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 16:55       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 16:55       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 22:05       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 22:05         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 22:05         ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57ffa62b-76da-c643-fa68-aed92b1e92e0@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.