* rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
@ 2016-10-27 9:26 Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman
2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yehuda Sadeh; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
Hi Yehuda,
The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 9:26 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Loic Dachary
@ 2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman
2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Orit Wasserman @ 2016-10-27 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
Hi Loic,
We still need :
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11472
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669 (needs teuthology run)
Nice to have:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17372
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17571
Thanks,
Orit
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman
@ 2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary
2016-10-28 12:39 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Orit Wasserman; +Cc: Ceph Development
On 27/10/2016 20:33, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> Hi Loic,
> We still need :
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11472
Merged.
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669 (needs teuthology run)
Will run it first thing tomorrow morning.
>
> Nice to have:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17372
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17571
Thanks for the quick feedback !
Cheers
>
> Thanks,
> Orit
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 9:26 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman
@ 2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson
2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2016-10-27 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> The next jewel release as found at
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite
> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel
> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280
This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(.
(it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug)
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1083 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin H. Johnson; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
Hi Robin,
Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary.
Cheers
On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next jewel release as found at
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite
>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel
>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280
>
> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(.
> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug)
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub @ 2016-10-27 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary
Cc: Robin H. Johnson, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Orit Wasserman
We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been
accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see
it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is
supposed to look into that.
Yehuda
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> The next jewel release as found at
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite
>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel
>>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280
>>
>> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(.
>> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug)
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-10-28 12:39 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-28 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Orit Wasserman; +Cc: Ceph Development
On 27/10/2016 21:44, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/2016 20:33, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>> Hi Loic,
>> We still need :
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11472
>
> Merged.
>
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669 (needs teuthology run)
>
> Will run it first thing tomorrow morning.
The tests were successfull (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669#issuecomment-256782689) and the pull request was merged.
>>
>> Nice to have:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17372
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17571
>
> Thanks for the quick feedback !
>
> Cheers
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Orit
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
@ 2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman
2016-11-01 14:54 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Orit Wasserman @ 2016-11-01 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
Cc: Loic Dachary, Robin H. Johnson, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 is merged in master.
Loic, is it still possible to backport it to 10.2.4?
Thanks,
Orit
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
<yehuda@redhat.com> wrote:
> We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been
> accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see
> it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is
> supposed to look into that.
>
> Yehuda
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>>
>> Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>>
>>>> The next jewel release as found at
>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite
>>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel
>>>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280
>>>
>>> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(.
>>> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug)
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4
2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman
@ 2016-11-01 14:54 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-11-01 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Orit Wasserman, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
Cc: Robin H. Johnson, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney
On 01/11/2016 10:17, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 is merged in master.
> Loic, is it still possible to backport it to 10.2.4?
Yes.
>
> Thanks,
> Orit
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
> <yehuda@redhat.com> wrote:
>> We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been
>> accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see
>> it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is
>> supposed to look into that.
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Robin,
>>>
>>> Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>>>
>>>>> The next jewel release as found at
>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite
>>>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel
>>>>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in
>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280
>>>>
>>>> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(.
>>>> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug)
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-01 14:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-27 9:26 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman
2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary
2016-10-28 12:39 ` Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson
2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary
2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman
2016-11-01 14:54 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.