All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86emul: support BMI2 insns
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:32:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <587CBD68020000780013061B@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4c056b6-6955-bb26-b6b7-e2f31c0d7186@citrix.com>

>>> On 13.01.17 at 19:20, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 13/01/17 15:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Note that the adjustment to the mode_64bit() definition is so that we
>> can avoid "#ifdef __x86_64__" around the 64-bit asm() portions. An
>> alternative would be single asm()s with a conditional branch over the
>> (manually encoded) REX64 prefix.
> 
> This presumably relying on sensible dead-code-elimitation to compile? 

Yes.

> Does this offer any further opportunities with removing other ifdefs?

When I had written this, it looked like it might, but I didn't create
any follow-up patches so far.

>> @@ -5973,6 +5987,33 @@ x86_emulate(
>>          break;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_VEX_F2(0x0f38, 0xf6): /* mulx r/m,r,r */
>> +        vcpu_must_have(bmi2);
>> +        generate_exception_if(vex.l, EXC_UD);
> 
> vex.w again.

Nope (see also the textual description, which actually mentions
VEX.L).

>> +        ea.reg = decode_register(~vex.reg & (mode_64bit() ? 0xf : 7),
>> +                                 &_regs, 0);
>> +        if ( mode_64bit() && vex.w )
>> +            asm ( "mulq %3" : "=a" (*ea.reg), "=d" (dst.val)
>> +                            : "0" (src.val), "rm" (_regs.r(dx)) );
>> +        else
>> +            asm ( "mull %3" : "=a" (*ea.reg), "=d" (dst.val)
>> +                            : "0" ((uint32_t)src.val), "rm" (_regs._edx) );
>> +        break;
>> +
>> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_VEX_F2(0x0f3a, 0xf0): /* rorx imm,r/m,r */
>> +        vcpu_must_have(bmi2);
>> +        generate_exception_if(vex.l || vex.reg != 0xf, EXC_UD);
> 
> What does this vex.reg check correspond to?  I can't locate anything
> relevant in the manuals.

Indeed the manual says nothing, but this again appears to be a
doc error: The instruction does #UD in that case. I'll add a word
to the commit message.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-13 15:11 [PATCH 0/8] x86emul: support various ISA extensions Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86emul: support POPCNT Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 16:31   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86emul: support ADCX/ADOX Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 16:34   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86emul: support BMI1 insns Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 17:40   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 11:19     ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-16 11:59       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 12:43         ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-16 12:57           ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-16 13:51             ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 13:58               ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-16 14:17                 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 15:43                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 15:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86emul: support BMI2 insns Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 18:20   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 11:32     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2017-01-13 15:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86emul: support TBM insns Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 18:48   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 11:36     ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-16 14:52       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-16 15:45         ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 15:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86emul: support RDRAND/RDSEED Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 18:55   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-13 15:34 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86emul: support RDPID Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 19:00   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86emul: rename the no_writeback label Jan Beulich
2017-01-13 19:01   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=587CBD68020000780013061B@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.