All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>, Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	huxinwei@huawei.com, yimin@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
	Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:59:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5895519F.2060608@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2eb29e2-0f46-0be0-dc43-b3a086556965@codeaurora.org>

On 2017/2/3 22:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
>> msi support.
>>
>> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT
>> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform
>> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent
>> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support).
>>
> I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces
> of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in
> due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions.

I think both Agustin's patch set and my mbigen one are in good shape
now if I didn't miss something, Rafael and Lorenzo already acked Agustin's
patch [1-2/3], I provided my review and test tags on them.

And Lorenzo said about the mbigen patches:
"I think this patch (and the FW that goes with it) is wrong, but the rest
of the series, in particular the IORT bits, are ok with me."
and I fixed the wrong patch and updated the _PRS to _CRS as Lorenzo
suggested in v8.

So, can I kindly ask that those patches (Agustin's patch set and my mbigen one)
be merged to 4.11 please? It's really important for Hisilicon (Hip06/Hip07) SoCs
which native NIC [1], SAS [2], USB and even the console on Hip07-D05 drivers
depend on those patches, and those platform are completely dead without
them if PCI is not enabled...

Thanks
Hanjun

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>, Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	<yimin@huawei.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <mbrugger@suse.com>,
	Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:59:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5895519F.2060608@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2eb29e2-0f46-0be0-dc43-b3a086556965@codeaurora.org>

On 2017/2/3 22:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
>> msi support.
>>
>> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT
>> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform
>> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent
>> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support).
>>
> I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces
> of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in
> due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions.

I think both Agustin's patch set and my mbigen one are in good shape
now if I didn't miss something, Rafael and Lorenzo already acked Agustin's
patch [1-2/3], I provided my review and test tags on them.

And Lorenzo said about the mbigen patches:
"I think this patch (and the FW that goes with it) is wrong, but the rest
of the series, in particular the IORT bits, are ok with me."
and I fixed the wrong patch and updated the _PRS to _CRS as Lorenzo
suggested in v8.

So, can I kindly ask that those patches (Agustin's patch set and my mbigen one)
be merged to 4.11 please? It's really important for Hisilicon (Hip06/Hip07) SoCs
which native NIC [1], SAS [2], USB and even the console on Hip07-D05 drivers
depend on those patches, and those platform are completely dead without
them if PCI is not enabled...

Thanks
Hanjun

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:59:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5895519F.2060608@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2eb29e2-0f46-0be0-dc43-b3a086556965@codeaurora.org>

On 2017/2/3 22:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
>> msi support.
>>
>> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT
>> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform
>> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent
>> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support).
>>
> I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces
> of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in
> due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions.

I think both Agustin's patch set and my mbigen one are in good shape
now if I didn't miss something, Rafael and Lorenzo already acked Agustin's
patch [1-2/3], I provided my review and test tags on them.

And Lorenzo said about the mbigen patches:
"I think this patch (and the FW that goes with it) is wrong, but the rest
of the series, in particular the IORT bits, are ok with me."
and I fixed the wrong patch and updated the _PRS to _CRS as Lorenzo
suggested in v8.

So, can I kindly ask that those patches (Agustin's patch set and my mbigen one)
be merged to 4.11 please? It's really important for Hisilicon (Hip06/Hip07) SoCs
which native NIC [1], SAS [2], USB and even the console on Hip07-D05 drivers
depend on those patches, and those platform are completely dead without
them if PCI is not enabled...

Thanks
Hanjun

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-04  4:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 12:54 [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] ACPI: IORT: fix the indentation in iort_scan_node() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] ACPI: IORT: add missing comment for iort_dev_find_its_id() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] ACPI: IORT: minor cleanup for iort_match_node_callback() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] irqchip: gic-v3-its: keep the head file include in alphabetic order Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: refactor its_pmsi_prepare() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: refactor its_pmsi_init() to prepare for ACPI Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: platform-msi: scan MADT to create platform msi domain Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] ACPI: IORT: rename iort_node_map_rid() to make it generic Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] ACPI: IORT: introduce iort_node_map_platform_id() to retrieve dev id Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:54   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-04-17 21:44   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-17 21:44     ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-17 22:01     ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-17 22:01       ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-18  1:27       ` Hanjun Guo
2017-04-18  1:27         ` Hanjun Guo
2017-04-18  1:27         ` Hanjun Guo
2017-04-18  1:30         ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-18  1:30           ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-18  1:33           ` Hanjun Guo
2017-04-18  1:33             ` Hanjun Guo
2017-04-18  1:33             ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] ACPI: platform: setup MSI domain for ACPI based platform device Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] msi: platform: make platform_msi_create_device_domain() ACPI aware Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] irqchip: mbigen: drop module owner Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] irqchip: mbigen: introduce mbigen_of_create_domain() Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] irqchip: mbigen: Add ACPI support Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-01-18 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-03  2:27   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-03  2:27     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-03 14:50 ` [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 14:50   ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 15:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-03 15:11     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-03 15:35     ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 15:35       ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 15:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-03 15:49         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-03 15:49         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-03 15:57         ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 15:57           ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 16:40           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-02-03 16:40             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-02-03 16:52             ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 16:52               ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-04  3:59   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-02-04  3:59     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-04  3:59     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-03 18:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-02-03 18:36   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-02-04  7:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-04  7:02     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-04  7:02     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-02-06 14:22     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-02-06 14:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5895519F.2060608@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=agustinv@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=majun258@huawei.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yimin@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.