* No man page for kdump (yet?)
@ 2017-04-10 11:57 Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-10 21:26 ` Philip Prindeville
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bhupesh Sharma @ 2017-04-10 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kexec, ebiederm, horms
Hi,
It seems the latest upstream kexec-tools does support a complete man
page for kdump yet:
DESCRIPTION
kdump does not have a man page yet.
I would propose having a propose having a man page for kdump (as the
feature is quite useful and has matured over time).
I can work to cook up a patch for the same.
Please let me know if this makes sense or if there are any objections
to the same.
Regards,
Bhupesh
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: No man page for kdump (yet?)
2017-04-10 11:57 No man page for kdump (yet?) Bhupesh Sharma
@ 2017-04-10 21:26 ` Philip Prindeville
2017-04-13 1:52 ` Xunlei Pang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philip Prindeville @ 2017-04-10 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bhupesh Sharma; +Cc: horms, kexec, ebiederm
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems the latest upstream kexec-tools does support a complete man
> page for kdump yet:
>
> DESCRIPTION
> kdump does not have a man page yet.
>
> I would propose having a propose having a man page for kdump (as the
> feature is quite useful and has matured over time).
>
> I can work to cook up a patch for the same.
>
> Please let me know if this makes sense or if there are any objections
> to the same.
>
> Regards,
> Bhupesh
Personally I’d welcome one.
-Philip
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: No man page for kdump (yet?)
2017-04-10 21:26 ` Philip Prindeville
@ 2017-04-13 1:52 ` Xunlei Pang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xunlei Pang @ 2017-04-13 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philip Prindeville, Bhupesh Sharma; +Cc: horms, kexec, ebiederm
On 04/11/2017 at 05:26 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> On Apr 10, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems the latest upstream kexec-tools does support a complete man
>> page for kdump yet:
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>> kdump does not have a man page yet.
>>
>> I would propose having a propose having a man page for kdump (as the
>> feature is quite useful and has matured over time).
>>
>> I can work to cook up a patch for the same.
>>
>> Please let me know if this makes sense or if there are any objections
>> to the same.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bhupesh
>
> Personally I’d welcome one.
This tool(/usr/sbin/kdump) looks like "cp /proc/vmcore" under kdump,
does anyone know its existent/potential users?
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> -Philip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-13 1:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-10 11:57 No man page for kdump (yet?) Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-10 21:26 ` Philip Prindeville
2017-04-13 1:52 ` Xunlei Pang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.