All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
To: <michael@walle.cc>, <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>
Cc: sr@denx.de, vigneshr@ti.com, jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw,
	richard@nod.at, esben@geanix.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	knaerzche@gmail.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, macromorgan@hotmail.com,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw,
	p.yadav@ti.com, mail@david-bauer.net, code@reto-schneider.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Handle ID collision b/w MX25L3233F and MX25L3205D
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 00:36:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58af5b61-83a6-38bf-05d1-f1ded5299f30@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b533feb1c69ddae69dd88a44a902eb47@walle.cc>

On 3/3/22 18:45, Michael Walle wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Am 2022-03-03 17:31, schrieb Heiko Thiery:
> ..
> 
>>>>>> # xxd -p mx25l3233f-sfdp
>>>>>> 53464450000101ff00000109300000ffc2000104600000ffffffffffffff
>>>>>> ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe520f1ffffffff0144eb086b
>>>>>> 083b04bbeeffffffffff00ffffff00ff0c200f5210d800ffffffffffffff
>>>>>> ffffffffffff003650269cf97764fecfffffffffffff
>>>>>
>>>>> Is quad enable working or has this the same problem as
>>>>> the macronix flash in patch 4? Judging by the length of the SFDP
>>>>> this also lacks the required information to select an
>>>>> appropriate enable method. I haven't had closer look though.
>>>>
>>>> it worked, yes. As I specified in the commit message, I tested it
>>> and
>>>> it used
>>>> SPINOR_OP_READ_1_4_4 0xeb opcode for reads.
>>>
>>> I'm confused, why is Heiko reporting that the CR/SR writing isn't
>>> working because a wrong quad_enable method is chosen, but here it
>>> will work. What am I missing?
>>
>> I suppose that the flash that supports the RSSFDP is JEDES216B
>> compatible including DWORD[15]. The flash that I have is only JEDES216
>> compatible and has not the DWORD[15] defined.
> 
> That was why I wrote "Judging by the length of the SFDP". I've
> converted both the mx25l12835f and mx25l3233f to binary and both
> are 112 bytes long. Both seem to have the short BFPT table, ie.
> no DWORD(15). Both seem to have a second table at offset 60h.
> 

I've just redone the test, I see:
root@sama5d2-xplained:~# mtd_debug read /dev/mtd1 0 65536 read
atmel_qspi f0020000.spi: op->cmd.opcode = 00eb, so SPINOR_OP_READ_1_4_4 as I said.

Michael, you have the eyes of an eagle, only the first 9 BFPT dwords are defined:
spi-nor spi1.0: bfpt_header->length = 9
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(1)] = fff120e5
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(2)] = 01ffffff
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(3)] = 6b08eb44
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(4)] = bb043b08
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(5)] = ffffffee
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(6)] = ff00ffff
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(7)] = ff00ffff
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(8)] = 520f200c
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(9)] = ff00d810

What happens is that the QE bit is non volatile and it's already set.

spi-nor spi1.0: spi_nor_quad_enable
spi-nor spi1.0: spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable
atmel_qspi f0020000.spi: op->cmd.opcode = 0035
spi-nor spi1.0: spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable cr = ff
atmel_qspi f0020000.spi: op->cmd.opcode = 0005
spi-nor spi1.0: sr = 40

spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable is called, RDCR is ignored so 0xff,
but I did a read of the SR and surprise, it's value is 0x40, so QE set.
This is a new kind of bug :). So yes, this patch has the same problem
as Heiko's, I will update it. Thanks for the heads up!
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
To: <michael@walle.cc>, <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>
Cc: sr@denx.de, vigneshr@ti.com, jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw,
	richard@nod.at, esben@geanix.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	knaerzche@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, macromorgan@hotmail.com,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw,
	figgyc@figgyc.uk, p.yadav@ti.com, mail@david-bauer.net,
	code@reto-schneider.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Handle ID collision b/w MX25L3233F and MX25L3205D
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 00:36:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58af5b61-83a6-38bf-05d1-f1ded5299f30@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b533feb1c69ddae69dd88a44a902eb47@walle.cc>

On 3/3/22 18:45, Michael Walle wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Am 2022-03-03 17:31, schrieb Heiko Thiery:
> ..
> 
>>>>>> # xxd -p mx25l3233f-sfdp
>>>>>> 53464450000101ff00000109300000ffc2000104600000ffffffffffffff
>>>>>> ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe520f1ffffffff0144eb086b
>>>>>> 083b04bbeeffffffffff00ffffff00ff0c200f5210d800ffffffffffffff
>>>>>> ffffffffffff003650269cf97764fecfffffffffffff
>>>>>
>>>>> Is quad enable working or has this the same problem as
>>>>> the macronix flash in patch 4? Judging by the length of the SFDP
>>>>> this also lacks the required information to select an
>>>>> appropriate enable method. I haven't had closer look though.
>>>>
>>>> it worked, yes. As I specified in the commit message, I tested it
>>> and
>>>> it used
>>>> SPINOR_OP_READ_1_4_4 0xeb opcode for reads.
>>>
>>> I'm confused, why is Heiko reporting that the CR/SR writing isn't
>>> working because a wrong quad_enable method is chosen, but here it
>>> will work. What am I missing?
>>
>> I suppose that the flash that supports the RSSFDP is JEDES216B
>> compatible including DWORD[15]. The flash that I have is only JEDES216
>> compatible and has not the DWORD[15] defined.
> 
> That was why I wrote "Judging by the length of the SFDP". I've
> converted both the mx25l12835f and mx25l3233f to binary and both
> are 112 bytes long. Both seem to have the short BFPT table, ie.
> no DWORD(15). Both seem to have a second table at offset 60h.
> 

I've just redone the test, I see:
root@sama5d2-xplained:~# mtd_debug read /dev/mtd1 0 65536 read
atmel_qspi f0020000.spi: op->cmd.opcode = 00eb, so SPINOR_OP_READ_1_4_4 as I said.

Michael, you have the eyes of an eagle, only the first 9 BFPT dwords are defined:
spi-nor spi1.0: bfpt_header->length = 9
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(1)] = fff120e5
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(2)] = 01ffffff
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(3)] = 6b08eb44
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(4)] = bb043b08
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(5)] = ffffffee
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(6)] = ff00ffff
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(7)] = ff00ffff
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(8)] = 520f200c
spi-nor spi1.0: BFPT[DWORD(9)] = ff00d810

What happens is that the QE bit is non volatile and it's already set.

spi-nor spi1.0: spi_nor_quad_enable
spi-nor spi1.0: spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable
atmel_qspi f0020000.spi: op->cmd.opcode = 0035
spi-nor spi1.0: spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable cr = ff
atmel_qspi f0020000.spi: op->cmd.opcode = 0005
spi-nor spi1.0: sr = 40

spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable is called, RDCR is ignored so 0xff,
but I did a read of the SR and surprise, it's value is 0x40, so QE set.
This is a new kind of bug :). So yes, this patch has the same problem
as Heiko's, I will update it. Thanks for the heads up!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28 13:44 [PATCH v4 0/6] mtd: spi-nor: Handle ID collisions Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:44 ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] mtd: spi-nor: core: Report correct name in case of " Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01 21:38   ` Michael Walle
2022-03-01 21:38     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-05 19:41   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-05 19:41     ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-02-28 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] mtd: spi-nor: core: Handle ID collisions between SFDP & non-SFDP flashes Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01 21:52   ` Michael Walle
2022-03-01 21:52     ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 14:41     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 14:41       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 14:51       ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 14:51         ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 15:25         ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 15:25           ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 15:42           ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 15:42             ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 16:03             ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 16:03               ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 16:39               ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 16:39                 ` Michael Walle
2022-02-28 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Handle ID collision b/w MX25L3233F and MX25L3205D Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01 21:57   ` Michael Walle
2022-03-01 21:57     ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 15:28     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 15:28       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 15:33       ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 15:33         ` Michael Walle
     [not found]         ` <CAEyMn7aN+wJnYkTJU_nWA9bPzF1sezA9_=E5YG5rnPBLMAmabA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-03 16:45           ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 16:45             ` Michael Walle
2022-03-04  0:36             ` Tudor.Ambarus [this message]
2022-03-04  0:36               ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-04 14:36               ` Michael Walle
2022-03-04 14:36                 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-05 19:50                 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-05 19:50                   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-02-28 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Handle ID collision b/w MX25L12805D and MX25L12835F Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01  7:55   ` Heiko Thiery
2022-03-01  7:55     ` Heiko Thiery
2022-03-01  8:52     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-01  8:52       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-01  9:31       ` Heiko Thiery
2022-03-01  9:31         ` Heiko Thiery
2022-02-28 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce Manufacturer ID collisions driver Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01 22:19   ` Michael Walle
2022-03-01 22:19     ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 16:12     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 16:12       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 21:38       ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 21:38         ` Michael Walle
2022-03-04  7:07         ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-04  7:07           ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-04 14:10           ` Michael Walle
2022-03-04 14:10             ` Michael Walle
2022-03-04 21:20   ` George Brooke
2022-03-04 21:20     ` George Brooke
2022-03-07  7:07     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-07  7:07       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] mtd: spi-nor: manuf-id-collisions: Add support for xt25f128b Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 13:45   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01 22:23   ` Michael Walle
2022-03-01 22:23     ` Michael Walle
2022-03-03 21:04     ` Chris Morgan
2022-03-03 21:04       ` Chris Morgan
2022-03-03 23:50       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-03 23:50         ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-03-04  2:23         ` Chris Morgan
2022-03-04  2:23           ` Chris Morgan
2022-02-28 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] mtd: spi-nor: Handle ID collisions Michael Walle
2022-02-28 13:55   ` Michael Walle
2022-02-28 15:39   ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Move XMC to manufacturer ID collisions driver Tudor Ambarus
2022-02-28 15:39     ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01  6:47   ` [PATCH v2] " Tudor Ambarus
2022-03-01  6:47     ` Tudor Ambarus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58af5b61-83a6-38bf-05d1-f1ded5299f30@microchip.com \
    --to=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=code@reto-schneider.ch \
    --cc=esben@geanix.com \
    --cc=heiko.thiery@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=knaerzche@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=macromorgan@hotmail.com \
    --cc=mail@david-bauer.net \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.