All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
	Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Marek Behun <kabel@blackhole.sk>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 14/15] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: map virtual bridges with forwarding offload in the PVT
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 19:52:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5915e957-8a22-54d4-fb56-aa080f21fce9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210718214434.3938850-15-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>



On 7/18/2021 2:44 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The mv88e6xxx switches have the ability to receive FORWARD (data plane)
> frames from the CPU port and route them according to the FDB. We can use
> this to offload the forwarding process of packets sent by the software
> bridge.
> 
> Because DSA supports bridge domain isolation between user ports, just
> sending FORWARD frames is not enough, as they might leak the intended
> broadcast domain of the bridge on behalf of which the packets are sent.
> 
> It should be noted that FORWARD frames are also (and typically) used to
> forward data plane packets on DSA links in cross-chip topologies. The
> FORWARD frame header contains the source port and switch ID, and
> switches receiving this frame header forward the packet according to
> their cross-chip port-based VLAN table (PVT).
> 
> To address the bridging domain isolation in the context of offloading
> the forwarding on TX, the idea is that we can reuse the parts of the PVT
> that don't have any physical switch mapped to them, one entry for each
> software bridge. The switches will therefore think that behind their
> upstream port lie many switches, all in fact backed up by software
> bridges through tag_dsa.c, which constructs FORWARD packets with the
> right switch ID corresponding to each bridge.
> 
> The mapping we use is absolutely trivial: DSA gives us a unique bridge
> number, and we add the number of the physical switches in the DSA switch
> tree to that, to obtain a unique virtual bridge device number to use in
> the PVT.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>, Marek Behun <kabel@blackhole.sk>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v4 net-next 14/15] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: map virtual bridges with forwarding offload in the PVT
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 19:52:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5915e957-8a22-54d4-fb56-aa080f21fce9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210718214434.3938850-15-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>



On 7/18/2021 2:44 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The mv88e6xxx switches have the ability to receive FORWARD (data plane)
> frames from the CPU port and route them according to the FDB. We can use
> this to offload the forwarding process of packets sent by the software
> bridge.
> 
> Because DSA supports bridge domain isolation between user ports, just
> sending FORWARD frames is not enough, as they might leak the intended
> broadcast domain of the bridge on behalf of which the packets are sent.
> 
> It should be noted that FORWARD frames are also (and typically) used to
> forward data plane packets on DSA links in cross-chip topologies. The
> FORWARD frame header contains the source port and switch ID, and
> switches receiving this frame header forward the packet according to
> their cross-chip port-based VLAN table (PVT).
> 
> To address the bridging domain isolation in the context of offloading
> the forwarding on TX, the idea is that we can reuse the parts of the PVT
> that don't have any physical switch mapped to them, one entry for each
> software bridge. The switches will therefore think that behind their
> upstream port lie many switches, all in fact backed up by software
> bridges through tag_dsa.c, which constructs FORWARD packets with the
> right switch ID corresponding to each bridge.
> 
> The mapping we use is absolutely trivial: DSA gives us a unique bridge
> number, and we add the number of the physical switches in the DSA switch
> tree to that, to obtain a unique virtual bridge device number to use in
> the PVT.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-18 21:44 [PATCH v4 net-next 00/15] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 01/15] net: dpaa2-switch: use extack in dpaa2_switch_port_bridge_join Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  9:17   ` Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-19  9:17     ` [Bridge] " Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 02/15] net: dpaa2-switch: refactor prechangeupper sanity checks Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  9:18   ` Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-19  9:18     ` [Bridge] " Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 03/15] mlxsw: spectrum: " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 04/15] mlxsw: spectrum: refactor leaving an 8021q upper that is a bridge port Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:16   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:16     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 05/15] net: marvell: prestera: refactor prechangeupper sanity checks Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:20   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:20     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 06/15] net: switchdev: guard drivers against multiple obj replays on same bridge port Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:17   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:17     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 07/15] net: bridge: disambiguate offload_fwd_mark Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:26   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:26     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 08/15] net: bridge: switchdev: recycle unused hwdoms Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 09/15] net: bridge: switchdev: let drivers inform which bridge ports are offloaded Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  9:23   ` Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-19  9:23     ` [Bridge] " Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-20  7:53   ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-07-20  7:53     ` [Bridge] " Horatiu Vultur
2021-07-20  8:45     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-20  8:45       ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 10/15] net: bridge: switchdev object replay helpers for everybody Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  8:19   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  8:19     ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  9:26   ` Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-19  9:26     ` [Bridge] " Ioana Ciornei
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 11/15] net: bridge: switchdev: allow the TX data plane forwarding to be offloaded Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:43   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:43     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  7:22   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  7:22     ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 12/15] net: dsa: track the number of switches in a tree Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:54     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 13/15] net: dsa: add support for bridge TX forwarding offload Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:51   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:51     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 14/15] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: map virtual bridges with forwarding offload in the PVT Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:52   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-07-19  2:52     ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-18 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 15/15] net: dsa: tag_dsa: offload the bridge forwarding process Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-18 21:44   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  2:47   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  2:47     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-07-19  7:41     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-19  7:41       ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-20 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 00/15] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices Ido Schimmel
2021-07-20 11:24   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2021-07-20 13:20   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-20 13:20     ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-20 13:51     ` Ido Schimmel
2021-07-20 13:51       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5915e957-8a22-54d4-fb56-aa080f21fce9@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kabel@blackhole.sk \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.