Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch

[Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Friday 29 June 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>> It turns out that with Arnd's patches we now get "-mcpu=powerpc64" on
>> the command line, and that means that gcc *doesn't* put "-mppc64" the
>> as command line, and as barfs on the 64-bit instructions.  That's
>> presumably a gcc bug, but we'll have to work around it.  I think the
>> best thing is just to not put the -mcpu=powerpc64 in CFLAGS when no
>> specific CPU is selected.
>
> I can't reproduce the problem here unfortunately. My idea was to  
> always
> pass _some_ -mcpu= flag, in order to make sure it does not use
> an inappropriate default, e.g. when the compiler is built for a  
> default
> for power4 but you actually want to build a power3 kernel.
>
> Would it work reliably if we switch the arguments to
> '-mcpu=powerpc64 -m64' instead of '-m64 -mcpu=powerpc64'? That
> might be better than taking it out entirely.

Is there a reason you didn't use -mcpu=power3 and -mcpu=rs64 for  
those to CPU options?

- k