All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
To: Alexander Shenkin <al@shenkin.org>,
	Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>,
	Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
	Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SMART detects pending sectors; take offline?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:01:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59DF4B80.5010807@youngman.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ab868eb-3ce3-f01b-ac9e-23358563040c@shenkin.org>

On 12/10/17 10:50, Alexander Shenkin wrote:
> Thanks Phil... Googling around, I haven't found a way to change it
> either, but then again, I'm not really sure what to search for.
> 
> What about changing my default disk timeout to something less than 120
> secs?  Say, 100 secs instead of 180?
> 
> Seems like this issue should probably make it into the timeout wiki
> page, no?  Perhaps some instructions on how to query your system's
> hangcheck timeout, and thus making sure that you set your drive timeouts
> to less than that?

Very much so. What is a "hangcheck timeout"?

My wife has kindly bought the basics I need for a new PC for my birthday
(yeah! :-) and I've ordered two Seagate Ironwolfs to go with it, so I
will be setting this up from scratch. Raid, KVM, LVM, the works. So
hangcheck timeouts, documenting on the wiki, all the other bits, the
important thing is I'll have a brand new system I can play with that's
not got anything important on it and if the system (software side only,
of course :-) gets trashed, so what. I can try stuff out without
worrying about putting my live system at risk.

But back to topic. I know we have the disk timeout (on desktop drives,
any random number up to 180secs :-). We have the linux i/o wait timeout
- by default 30 secs. And now we have the hangcheck timeout, whatever
that is ...

Cheers,
Wol

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-07  7:48 SMART detects pending sectors; take offline? Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-07  8:21 ` Carsten Aulbert
2017-10-07 10:05   ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-07 17:29     ` Wols Lists
2017-10-08  9:19       ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-08  9:49         ` Wols Lists
2017-10-09 20:16   ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-10  9:00     ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10  9:11       ` Reindl Harald
2017-10-10  9:56         ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10 12:55           ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-11 10:31             ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-11 17:10               ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-12  9:50                 ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-12 11:01                   ` Wols Lists [this message]
2017-10-12 13:04                     ` Phil Turmel
2017-10-12 13:16                       ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-12 13:21                         ` Mark Knecht
2017-10-12 15:16                           ` Edward Kuns
2017-10-12 15:52                             ` Edward Kuns
2017-10-15 14:41                               ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-18 15:51                               ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-18 16:09                                 ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-19 10:35                                   ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-19 12:02                                     ` Phil Turmel
2017-12-21 11:28                                       ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-12-21 11:38                                         ` Reindl Harald
2017-12-23  3:14                                           ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-03 12:44                                             ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 13:26                                               ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-03 13:50                                                 ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 15:53                                                   ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-03 15:59                                                     ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-03 16:02                                                       ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-04 10:37                                                         ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-04 12:28                                                           ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-04 13:16                                                             ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-04 13:39                                                               ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05  5:20                                                                 ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05  5:25                                                                   ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 10:10                                                                     ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 10:32                                                                       ` Brad Campbell
2018-01-05 13:50                                                                       ` Phil Turmel
2018-01-05 14:01                                                                         ` Alexander Shenkin
2018-01-05 15:59                                                                         ` Wols Lists
2017-10-12 15:19                   ` Kai Stian Olstad
2017-10-10 22:23           ` josh
2017-10-11  6:23             ` Alexander Shenkin
2017-10-10  9:21       ` Wols Lists

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59DF4B80.5010807@youngman.org.uk \
    --to=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
    --cc=al@shenkin.org \
    --cc=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
    --cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip@turmel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.