All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	labbott@redhat.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Bug 198497] handle_mm_fault / xen_pmd_val / radix_tree_lookup_slot Null pointer
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:42:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ADA0A6D02000078001BD177@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76a4ee3b-e00a-5032-df90-07d8e207f707@citrix.com>

>>> On 20.04.18 at 17:25, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 20/04/18 16:20, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>> Adding xen-devel and the Linux Xen maintainers.
>>
>> Summary: Some Xen users (and maybe others) are hitting a BUG in
>> __radix_tree_lookup() under do_swap_page() - example backtrace is
>> provided at the end.  Matthew Wilcox provided a band-aid patch that
>> prints errors like the following instead of triggering the bug.
>>
>> Skylake 32bit PAE Dom0:
>> Bad swp_entry: 80000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte d3a39f1c(8000000400000000)
>>
>> Ivy Bridge 32bit PAE Dom0:
>> Bad swp_entry: 40000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte d3a05f1c(8000000200000000)
>>
>> Other 32bit DomU:
>> Bad swp_entry: 4000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte e2187f30(8000000200000000)
>>
>> Other 32bit:
>> Bad swp_entry: 2000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte ef3a3f38(8000000100000000)
>>
>> The Linux bugzilla has more info
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198497 
>>
>> This may not be exclusive to Xen Linux, but most of the reports are on
>> Xen.  Matthew wonders if Xen might be stepping on the upper bits of a
>> pte.
> 
> Yes - Xen does use the upper bits of a PTE, but only 1 in release
> builds, and a second in debug builds.  I don't understand where you're
> getting the 3rd bit in there.

The former supposedly is _PAGE_GUEST_KERNEL, which we use for 64-bit
guests only. Above talk is of 32-bit guests only.

In addition both this and _PAGE_GNTTAB are used on present PTEs only,
while above talk is about swap entries.

Jan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>,
	bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, labbott@redhat.com,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 198497] handle_mm_fault / xen_pmd_val / radix_tree_lookup_slot Null pointer
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:42:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ADA0A6D02000078001BD177@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76a4ee3b-e00a-5032-df90-07d8e207f707@citrix.com>

>>> On 20.04.18 at 17:25, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 20/04/18 16:20, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>> Adding xen-devel and the Linux Xen maintainers.
>>
>> Summary: Some Xen users (and maybe others) are hitting a BUG in
>> __radix_tree_lookup() under do_swap_page() - example backtrace is
>> provided at the end.  Matthew Wilcox provided a band-aid patch that
>> prints errors like the following instead of triggering the bug.
>>
>> Skylake 32bit PAE Dom0:
>> Bad swp_entry: 80000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte d3a39f1c(8000000400000000)
>>
>> Ivy Bridge 32bit PAE Dom0:
>> Bad swp_entry: 40000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte d3a05f1c(8000000200000000)
>>
>> Other 32bit DomU:
>> Bad swp_entry: 4000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte e2187f30(8000000200000000)
>>
>> Other 32bit:
>> Bad swp_entry: 2000000
>> mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte ef3a3f38(8000000100000000)
>>
>> The Linux bugzilla has more info
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198497 
>>
>> This may not be exclusive to Xen Linux, but most of the reports are on
>> Xen.  Matthew wonders if Xen might be stepping on the upper bits of a
>> pte.
> 
> Yes - Xen does use the upper bits of a PTE, but only 1 in release
> builds, and a second in debug builds.  I don't understand where you're
> getting the 3rd bit in there.

The former supposedly is _PAGE_GUEST_KERNEL, which we use for 64-bit
guests only. Above talk is of 32-bit guests only.

In addition both this and _PAGE_GNTTAB are used on present PTEs only,
while above talk is about swap entries.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-198497-200779@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <bug-198497-200779-43rwxa1kcg@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2018-04-20 13:10   ` [Bug 198497] handle_mm_fault / xen_pmd_val / radix_tree_lookup_slot Null pointer Jason Andryuk
2018-04-20 13:39     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-20 15:20       ` Jason Andryuk
2018-04-20 15:20         ` Jason Andryuk
2018-04-20 15:25         ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2018-04-20 15:25           ` Andrew Cooper
2018-04-20 15:40           ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2018-04-20 15:40             ` Andrew Cooper
2018-04-20 15:42           ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2018-04-20 15:42             ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-20 15:52             ` [Xen-devel] " Jason Andryuk
2018-04-20 15:52               ` Jason Andryuk
2018-04-20 16:00               ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2018-04-20 16:00                 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-04-20 16:02               ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2018-04-20 16:02                 ` Jan Beulich
2018-04-20 19:20                 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2018-04-20 19:20                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-04-21  6:17                   ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2018-04-21  6:17                     ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-21 14:35                 ` [Xen-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-21 14:35                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-22  5:50                   ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2018-04-22  5:50                     ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-23  8:17         ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-23  8:17           ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-04 12:54           ` Jason Andryuk
2018-09-04 12:54             ` Jason Andryuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ADA0A6D02000078001BD177@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.