From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <arno@natisbad.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/pamu: Use kzfree rather than its implementation Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:38:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5D6F8606.8030109@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190904081517.GA29855@8bytes.org> On 2019/9/4 16:15, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:01:18AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: >> Use kzfree instead of memset() + kfree(). >> >> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >> index cde281b..ca6d147 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >> @@ -1174,10 +1174,8 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (irq != NO_IRQ) >> free_irq(irq, data); >> >> - if (data) { >> - memset(data, 0, sizeof(struct pamu_isr_data)); >> - kfree(data); >> - } >> + if (data) >> + kzfree(data); > kzfree() is doing its own NULL-ptr check, no need to do it here. Yep, we should also remove the condition before kzfree. will repost. Thanks, zhong jiang > Regards, > > Joerg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arno@natisbad.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/pamu: Use kzfree rather than its implementation Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:38:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5D6F8606.8030109@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190904081517.GA29855@8bytes.org> On 2019/9/4 16:15, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:01:18AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote: >> Use kzfree instead of memset() + kfree(). >> >> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 6 ++---- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >> index cde281b..ca6d147 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >> @@ -1174,10 +1174,8 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (irq != NO_IRQ) >> free_irq(irq, data); >> >> - if (data) { >> - memset(data, 0, sizeof(struct pamu_isr_data)); >> - kfree(data); >> - } >> + if (data) >> + kzfree(data); > kzfree() is doing its own NULL-ptr check, no need to do it here. Yep, we should also remove the condition before kzfree. will repost. Thanks, zhong jiang > Regards, > > Joerg _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 9:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-04 3:01 [PATCH 0/3] Use kzfree instead of memset() + kfree() zhong jiang 2019-09-04 3:01 ` zhong jiang 2019-09-04 3:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell: Use kzfree rather than its implementation zhong jiang 2019-09-04 3:01 ` zhong jiang 2019-09-09 7:53 ` Herbert Xu 2019-09-09 7:53 ` Herbert Xu 2019-09-04 3:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/pamu: " zhong jiang 2019-09-04 3:01 ` zhong jiang 2019-09-04 8:15 ` Joerg Roedel 2019-09-04 8:15 ` Joerg Roedel 2019-09-04 9:38 ` zhong jiang [this message] 2019-09-04 9:38 ` zhong jiang 2019-09-04 3:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] Staging: rtl8723bs: " zhong jiang 2019-09-04 3:01 ` zhong jiang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5D6F8606.8030109@huawei.com \ --to=zhongjiang@huawei.com \ --cc=arno@natisbad.org \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.