+ ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch added to -mm tree

+ ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch added to -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: ocfs2: clean dead code in suballoc.c
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
Subject: ocfs2: clean dead code in suballoc.c

Stack variable fe is no longer used, so trim it to save some CPU cycles
and stack space.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/63ADC13FD55D6546B7DECE290D39E373F1F5A8DD@H3CMLB14-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com
Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c~ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c~ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
@@ -2563,16 +2563,16 @@ static int _ocfs2_free_clusters(handle_t
 	int status;
 	u16 bg_start_bit;
 	u64 bg_blkno;
-	struct ocfs2_dinode *fe;
 
 	/* You can't ever have a contiguous set of clusters
 	 * bigger than a block group bitmap so we never have to worry
 	 * about looping on them.
 	 * This is expensive. We can safely remove once this stuff has
 	 * gotten tested really well. */
-	BUG_ON(start_blk != ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(bitmap_inode->i_sb, ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(bitmap_inode->i_sb, start_blk)));
+	BUG_ON(start_blk != ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(bitmap_inode->i_sb,
+				ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(bitmap_inode->i_sb,
+							 start_blk)));
 
-	fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) bitmap_bh->b_data;
 
 	ocfs2_block_to_cluster_group(bitmap_inode, start_blk, &bg_blkno,
 				     &bg_start_bit);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ge.changwei@h3c.com are

ocfs2-dlm-clean-dead-code-up.patch
ocfs2-cluster-neaten-a-member-of-o2net_msg_handler.patch
ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch