Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] docs/block-replication: use blockdev-backup

[John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>]

On 5/5/21 9:58 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We are going to deprecate drive-backup, so don't mention it here.
> Moreover, blockdev-backup seems more correct in the context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

> ---
>   docs/block-replication.txt | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/block-replication.txt b/docs/block-replication.txt
> index 108e9166a8..59eb2b33b3 100644
> --- a/docs/block-replication.txt
> +++ b/docs/block-replication.txt
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Primary |                 ||  Secondary disk <--------- hidden-disk 5 <---------
>                             ||        |                         |
>                             ||        |                         |
>                             ||        '-------------------------'
> -                          ||           drive-backup sync=none 6
> +                          ||         blockdev-backup sync=none 6
>   
>   1) The disk on the primary is represented by a block device with two
>   children, providing replication between a primary disk and the host that
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ should support bdrv_make_empty() and backing file.
>   that is modified by the primary VM. It should also start as an empty disk,
>   and the driver supports bdrv_make_empty() and backing file.
>   
> -6) The drive-backup job (sync=none) is run to allow hidden-disk to buffer
> +6) The blockdev-backup job (sync=none) is run to allow hidden-disk to buffer
>   any state that would otherwise be lost by the speculative write-through
>   of the NBD server into the secondary disk. So before block replication,
>   the primary disk and secondary disk should contain the same data.
>