From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "Latvala, Petri" <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Cc: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_psr2_su: Skip frontbuffer test in TGL
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:07:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b9297d93e06ae0bd8ae19e395d1e88bc3755fe9.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201027084934.GZ7444@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 10:49 +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 07:47:15PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 10:34 +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:11:51PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > > Due the commit 71c1a4998320 ("drm/i915/tgl/psr: Fix glitches when
> > > > doing frontbuffer modifications"), frontbuffer test is expected to
> > > > fail on TGL, so here skiping this test on TGL.
> > > > When PSR issues is fixed the patch above will be reverted and we
> > > > can revert this skip too.
> > >
> > > How does the previous failure behave? I mean in the sense that what
> > > does this skip gain? The skip will have to be cibuglog-filtered too so
> > > no gain on that side.
> > >
> > > Did the fail kill the machine, or is this just for saving runtime?
> >
> > Just saving time.
> > So no need for it?
>
> Depends on the amount. Do you have numbers for this? I guess if it
> saves entire minutes it becomes worth it.
>
>
Takes about one second when fails a little less when it was passing on TGL.
Just want to avoid a new freedesktop issue to be filed, we are tracking the right kernel fix in Jira.
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-23 23:11 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_psr2_su: Skip frontbuffer test in TGL José Roberto de Souza
2020-10-24 0:03 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-10-24 3:14 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-26 8:34 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Petri Latvala
2020-10-26 17:47 ` Souza, Jose
2020-10-27 8:49 ` Petri Latvala
2020-10-27 17:07 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2020-10-28 7:37 ` Petri Latvala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b9297d93e06ae0bd8ae19e395d1e88bc3755fe9.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.