All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	david@redhat.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 2/2] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 19:41:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d8f2ecc-0858-4708-a6cd-bf9692218935@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa415627-bfff-cc18-af94-cf55632973d5@linux.ibm.com>


On 6/1/23 11:38, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 5/19/23 13:22, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> STSI with function code 15 is used to store the CPU configuration
>> topology.
>>
>> We retrieve the maximum nested level with SCLP and use the
>> topology tree provided by the drawers, books, sockets, cores
>> arguments.
>>
>> We check :
>> - if the topology stored is coherent between the QEMU -smp
>>    parameters and kernel parameters.
>> - the number of CPUs
>> - the maximum number of CPUs
>> - the number of containers of each levels for every STSI(15.1.x)
>>    instruction allowed by the machine.
>
>>   [topology]
>>   file = topology.elf
>> +# 3 CPUs on socket 0 with different CPU TLE (standard, dedicated, 
>> origin)
>> +# 1 CPU on socket 2
>> +extra_params = -smp 
>> 1,drawers=3,books=3,sockets=4,cores=4,maxcpus=144 -cpu z14,ctop=on 
>> -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=1,entitlement=low -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=2,dedicated=on -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=10 
>> -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=20 -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=130,socket-id=0,book-id=0,drawer-id=0 -append 
>> '-drawers 3 -books 3 -sockets 4 -cores 4'
>> +
>> +[topology-2]
>> +file = topology.elf
>> +extra_params = -smp 
>> 1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=2,cores=30,maxcpus=240  -append '-drawers 
>> 2 -books 2 -sockets 2 -cores 30' -cpu z14,ctop=on -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=2,entitlement=low 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=3,entitlement=medium 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=4,entitlement=high 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=5,entitlement=high,dedicated=on 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=65,entitlement=low 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=66,entitlement=medium 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=67,entitlement=high 
>> -device 
>> z14-s390x-cpu,drawer-id=1,book-id=0,socket-id=0,core-id=68,entitlement=high,dedicated=on
>
> Pardon my ignorance but I see z14 in there, will this work if we run 
> on a z13?

I think it will, we do not use anything specific to the CPU but the 
Configuration topology facility which start with z10EC
and AFAIU QEMU will accept a processor newer than the one of the host, 
at least it does on my LPAR (VM z16b > host z16a)

But we can use z13 as basis, which also covers the case where I forgot 
something.


>
> Also, will this work/fail gracefully if the test is run with a quemu 
> that doesn't know about topology or will it crash?

It will crash, QEMU will refuse the drawers and book parameters if the 
QEMU patch for topology has not been applied.

So, I should first propose a simple unittests.cfg working with both, 
which will SKIP with "Topology facility not present" without the patch.

When the patch is becoming used we can add more testings.

Thanks for the comments.

Pierre




  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-19 11:22 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 0/2] S390x: CPU Topology Information Pierre Morel
2023-05-19 11:22 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 1/2] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 11:15   ` Nico Boehr
2023-05-22 15:17     ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-19 11:22 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 2/2] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel
2023-06-01  9:38   ` Janosch Frank
2023-06-01 17:41     ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-06-02  7:50       ` Janosch Frank
2023-06-02  8:35     ` Nico Boehr
2023-06-02  9:03       ` Janosch Frank
2023-06-02  9:20       ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-02 10:02         ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-02 10:01       ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d8f2ecc-0858-4708-a6cd-bf9692218935@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.