RE: WWAN rtnetlink follow-up

From: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: WWAN rtnetlink follow-up
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:04:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d9c826782d74aefbdf297324362afe7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZdPi-MrOAfLu6SaxdEqrZyUM=pyq7U8=dokmxdB+6-C3W3aA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Loic,

I have verified IOSM driver by cherry-picking the below [FIXUP] on top of Johannes & Sergey RFC patch.
Data path is functional. I will resubmit the IOSM Driver patches. 
https://git.linaro.org/people/loic.poulain/linux.git/commit/?h=wwan-dev&id=fd7e6d78ebad9930d22e5b5f430cae9ad5fc89fe
https://git.linaro.org/people/loic.poulain/linux.git/commit/?h=wwan-dev&id=6fb7cbd0c0bde0de872744e89ee87e36ed8ec6a7

RFC Series:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210602082840.85828-1-johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210603044954.8091-1-ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com/

Regards,
M Chetan Kumar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 3:58 PM
> To: Kumar, M Chetan <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>; Johannes Berg
> <johannes@sipsolutions.net>; Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
> Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski
> <kuba@kernel.org>; David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Dan Williams
> <dcbw@redhat.com>
> Subject: WWAN rtnetlink follow-up
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Thanks for your involvement and great work on this WWAN topic. I've picked
> your patches in my tree for testing (with a Qualcomm MHI
> modem):
> https://git.linaro.org/people/loic.poulain/linux.git/log/?h=wwan-dev
> 
> This is minimal support for now since mhi_net only supports one link,
> Essentially for testing purposes, but I plan to rework it to support more than
> one once wwan rtnetlink is accepted and merged, This limitation will not
> exist for the Intel IOSM driver.
> 
> I'm probably going to rebase that and squash the fix commits (from Sergey
> and I) to Johannes changes if everyone agrees. Then I'll submit the entire
> series.
> 
> Not sure what is the procedure for iproute2, should it be included in the
> series or be part of a dedicated one?
> 
> Chetan, you can use that tree for your iosm work, or cherry-pick the [FIXUP]
> changes if you already work on the submitted RFC series.
> 
> Refs:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210602082840.85828-1-
> johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210603044954.8091-1-
> ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com/
> 
> Thanks,
> Loic