Re: [PATCH] fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings

[Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>]

On 24/04/17 11:57, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Olimpiu Dejeu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Thompson <
>> daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/03/17 14:58, Olimpiu Dejeu wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:48 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> drivers/video/backlight/arcxcnn_bl.c:183:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
>>>>> can be used
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
>>>>>
>>>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
>>>>>
>>>>> CC: Olimpiu Dejeu <olimpiu@arcticsand.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>  arcxcnn_bl.c |    5 +----
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/arcxcnn_bl.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/arcxcnn_bl.c
>>>>> @@ -180,10 +180,7 @@ static int arcxcnn_backlight_register(st
>>>>>
>>>>>         lp->bl = devm_backlight_device_register(lp->dev, name, lp->dev,
>>>>> lp,
>>>>>                                        &arcxcnn_bl_ops, props);
>>>>> -       if (IS_ERR(lp->bl))
>>>>> -               return PTR_ERR(lp->bl);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -       return 0;
>>>>> +       return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(lp->bl);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>>  static void arcxcnn_parse_dt(struct arcxcnn *lp)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Olimpiu Dejeu <olimpiu@arcticsand.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Glad you approve! Could you apply this change and re-post the patch
>>> series? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>>
>> Applied change, re-posted series on March 21st. No sure what next. Please
>> advise. Thanks.
>
> Yes you did.
>
> Daniel, do you see v9?

Yep. All fine at my end... it has my Reviewed-by: which is an even more 
emphatic statement than my Acked-by: ;-) .

I think from this point on I think I'll start posting
"[vX-is-still-]Acked-by:" replies so you don't have to worry about 
whether I've seen new versions.


> FYI, if this happens again, it's best to wait a couple of weeks then
> send the patch again like "[RESEND v9] ..." to gain attention.

RESENDs are a good way to go. Also, if there are questions about the 
code its better to reply to the code rather than the side discussion.


Daniel.