Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mediatek: fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701

Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mediatek: fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701

[Matthias Brugger]

On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701.

This is a bug? Then we would need a fixes tag.
Otherwise you should explain in the commit, that you need to change the
calculation due to previous commits.

Regards,
Matthias

> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index a28a32d..10b6235 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  
>  	if (rate <= 64000000)
>  		pos_div = 3;
> -	else if (rate <= 12800000)
> -		pos_div = 1;
> +	else if (rate <= 128000000)
> +		pos_div = 2;
>  	else
>  		pos_div = 1;
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mediatek: fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701

[Matthias Brugger]

On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701.

This is a bug? Then we would need a fixes tag.
Otherwise you should explain in the commit, that you need to change the
calculation due to previous commits.

Regards,
Matthias

> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index a28a32d..10b6235 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  
>  	if (rate <= 64000000)
>  		pos_div = 3;
> -	else if (rate <= 12800000)
> -		pos_div = 1;
> +	else if (rate <= 128000000)
> +		pos_div = 2;
>  	else
>  		pos_div = 1;
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mediatek: fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701

[Chunhui Dai]

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> > fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701.
> 
> This is a bug? Then we would need a fixes tag.

yes, we would add the tag in V2.

> Otherwise you should explain in the commit, that you need to change the
> calculation due to previous commits.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > index a28a32d..10b6235 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >  
> >  	if (rate <= 64000000)
> >  		pos_div = 3;
> > -	else if (rate <= 12800000)
> > -		pos_div = 1;
> > +	else if (rate <= 128000000)
> > +		pos_div = 2;
> >  	else
> >  		pos_div = 1;
> >  
> > 

Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mediatek: fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701

[Chunhui Dai]

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> > fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701.
> 
> This is a bug? Then we would need a fixes tag.

yes, we would add the tag in V2.

> Otherwise you should explain in the commit, that you need to change the
> calculation due to previous commits.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > index a28a32d..10b6235 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >  
> >  	if (rate <= 64000000)
> >  		pos_div = 3;
> > -	else if (rate <= 12800000)
> > -		pos_div = 1;
> > +	else if (rate <= 128000000)
> > +		pos_div = 2;
> >  	else
> >  		pos_div = 1;
> >  
> > 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mediatek: fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701

[Chunhui Dai]

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> > fix the rate and divder of hdmi phy for MT2701.
> 
> This is a bug? Then we would need a fixes tag.

yes, we would add the tag in V2.

> Otherwise you should explain in the commit, that you need to change the
> calculation due to previous commits.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > index a28a32d..10b6235 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > @@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >  
> >  	if (rate <= 64000000)
> >  		pos_div = 3;
> > -	else if (rate <= 12800000)
> > -		pos_div = 1;
> > +	else if (rate <= 128000000)
> > +		pos_div = 2;
> >  	else
> >  		pos_div = 1;
> >  
> > 

Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/mediatek: recalculate hdmi phy clock of MT2701 by querying hardware

[Matthias Brugger]

On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> Recalculate the rate of this clock, by querying hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        |  7 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  8 +++++
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 4ef9c57..79e737d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,11 @@ long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	void __iomem *reg = hdmi_phy->regs + offset;
>  
> -	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +	return readl(reg);
>  }
>  
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index f39b1fc..fdad8b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct mtk_hdmi_phy {
>  	unsigned int ibias_up;
>  };
>  
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  			     u32 bits);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> @@ -50,8 +51,6 @@ void mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy *to_mtk_hdmi_phy(struct clk_hw *hw);
>  long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			     unsigned long *parent_rate);
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate);
>  
>  extern struct platform_driver mtk_hdmi_phy_driver;
>  extern struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index fcc42dc..b5ed6b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,55 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			  RG_HDMITX_DRV_IBIAS_MASK);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	unsigned long out_rate, val;
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_PREDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV;
> +	out_rate = out_rate * (val + 1) * 2;
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2)
> +			& RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV_MASK) >> RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = out_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x02:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x03:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 8;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2) & RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV)

Is this path time critical? You are reading the same register twice instead of
saving the read in a local varibale.

Regards,
Matthias

> +		out_rate = out_rate / 5;
> +
> +	hdmi_phy->pll_rate = out_rate;
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index ed5916b..cb23c1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
>  	.unprepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare,
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/mediatek: recalculate hdmi phy clock of MT2701 by querying hardware

[Matthias Brugger]

On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> Recalculate the rate of this clock, by querying hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        |  7 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  8 +++++
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 4ef9c57..79e737d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,11 @@ long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	void __iomem *reg = hdmi_phy->regs + offset;
>  
> -	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +	return readl(reg);
>  }
>  
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index f39b1fc..fdad8b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct mtk_hdmi_phy {
>  	unsigned int ibias_up;
>  };
>  
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  			     u32 bits);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> @@ -50,8 +51,6 @@ void mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy *to_mtk_hdmi_phy(struct clk_hw *hw);
>  long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			     unsigned long *parent_rate);
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate);
>  
>  extern struct platform_driver mtk_hdmi_phy_driver;
>  extern struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index fcc42dc..b5ed6b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,55 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			  RG_HDMITX_DRV_IBIAS_MASK);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	unsigned long out_rate, val;
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_PREDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV;
> +	out_rate = out_rate * (val + 1) * 2;
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2)
> +			& RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV_MASK) >> RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = out_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x02:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x03:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 8;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2) & RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV)

Is this path time critical? You are reading the same register twice instead of
saving the read in a local varibale.

Regards,
Matthias

> +		out_rate = out_rate / 5;
> +
> +	hdmi_phy->pll_rate = out_rate;
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index ed5916b..cb23c1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
>  	.unprepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare,
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/mediatek: recalculate hdmi phy clock of MT2701 by querying hardware

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:


On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> Recalculate the rate of this clock, by querying hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        |  7 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  8 +++++
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 4ef9c57..79e737d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,11 @@ long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	void __iomem *reg = hdmi_phy->regs + offset;
>  
> -	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +	return readl(reg);

reg is used only once, so

return readl(hdmi_phy->regs + offset);

>  }
>  
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index f39b1fc..fdad8b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct mtk_hdmi_phy {
>  	unsigned int ibias_up;
>  };
>  
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  			     u32 bits);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> @@ -50,8 +51,6 @@ void mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy *to_mtk_hdmi_phy(struct clk_hw *hw);
>  long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			     unsigned long *parent_rate);
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate);
>  
>  extern struct platform_driver mtk_hdmi_phy_driver;
>  extern struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index fcc42dc..b5ed6b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,55 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			  RG_HDMITX_DRV_IBIAS_MASK);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	unsigned long out_rate, val;
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_PREDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 4;
> +		break;

If the val would not be 3, maybe out_rate could be calculate as

out_rate >>= val;

> +	}
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV;
> +	out_rate = out_rate * (val + 1) * 2;

out_rate *= (val + 1) * 2;

> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2)
> +			& RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV_MASK) >> RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = out_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x02:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x03:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 8;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}

out_rate >>= val;

Regards,
CK

> +
> +	if (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2) & RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV)
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 5;
> +
> +	hdmi_phy->pll_rate = out_rate;
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index ed5916b..cb23c1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
>  	.unprepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare,

Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/mediatek: recalculate hdmi phy clock of MT2701 by querying hardware

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:


On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> Recalculate the rate of this clock, by querying hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        |  7 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  8 +++++
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 4ef9c57..79e737d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,11 @@ long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	void __iomem *reg = hdmi_phy->regs + offset;
>  
> -	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +	return readl(reg);

reg is used only once, so

return readl(hdmi_phy->regs + offset);

>  }
>  
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index f39b1fc..fdad8b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct mtk_hdmi_phy {
>  	unsigned int ibias_up;
>  };
>  
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  			     u32 bits);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> @@ -50,8 +51,6 @@ void mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy *to_mtk_hdmi_phy(struct clk_hw *hw);
>  long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			     unsigned long *parent_rate);
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate);
>  
>  extern struct platform_driver mtk_hdmi_phy_driver;
>  extern struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index fcc42dc..b5ed6b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,55 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			  RG_HDMITX_DRV_IBIAS_MASK);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	unsigned long out_rate, val;
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_PREDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 4;
> +		break;

If the val would not be 3, maybe out_rate could be calculate as

out_rate >>= val;

> +	}
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV;
> +	out_rate = out_rate * (val + 1) * 2;

out_rate *= (val + 1) * 2;

> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2)
> +			& RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV_MASK) >> RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = out_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x02:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x03:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 8;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}

out_rate >>= val;

Regards,
CK

> +
> +	if (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2) & RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV)
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 5;
> +
> +	hdmi_phy->pll_rate = out_rate;
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index ed5916b..cb23c1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
>  	.unprepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare,



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/mediatek: recalculate hdmi phy clock of MT2701 by querying hardware

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:


On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> Recalculate the rate of this clock, by querying hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        |  7 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  8 +++++
>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 4ef9c57..79e737d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -29,12 +29,11 @@ long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return rate;
>  }
>  
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	void __iomem *reg = hdmi_phy->regs + offset;
>  
> -	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +	return readl(reg);

reg is used only once, so

return readl(hdmi_phy->regs + offset);

>  }
>  
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index f39b1fc..fdad8b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct mtk_hdmi_phy {
>  	unsigned int ibias_up;
>  };
>  
> +u32 mtk_hdmi_phy_read(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  			     u32 bits);
>  void mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
> @@ -50,8 +51,6 @@ void mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, u32 offset,
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy *to_mtk_hdmi_phy(struct clk_hw *hw);
>  long mtk_hdmi_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			     unsigned long *parent_rate);
> -unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -				       unsigned long parent_rate);
>  
>  extern struct platform_driver mtk_hdmi_phy_driver;
>  extern struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index fcc42dc..b5ed6b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,55 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			  RG_HDMITX_DRV_IBIAS_MASK);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +	unsigned long out_rate, val;
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_PREDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		out_rate = parent_rate / 4;
> +		break;

If the val would not be 3, maybe out_rate could be calculate as

out_rate >>= val;

> +	}
> +
> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6)
> +			& RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV_MASK) >> RG_HTPLL_FBKDIV;
> +	out_rate = out_rate * (val + 1) * 2;

out_rate *= (val + 1) * 2;

> +	val = (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2)
> +			& RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV_MASK) >> RG_HDMITX_TX_POSDIV;
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 0x00:
> +		out_rate = out_rate;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x01:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 2;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x02:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 4;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x03:
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 8;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}

out_rate >>= val;

Regards,
CK

> +
> +	if (mtk_hdmi_phy_read(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2) & RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV)
> +		out_rate = out_rate / 5;
> +
> +	hdmi_phy->pll_rate = out_rate;
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
>  
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index ed5916b..cb23c1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long mtk_hdmi_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +				       unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy = to_mtk_hdmi_phy(hw);
> +
> +	return hdmi_phy->pll_rate;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct clk_ops mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops = {
>  	.prepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare,
>  	.unprepare = mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare,


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/mediatek: move the setting of fixed divider

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> move the setting of fixed divider from enable/disable
> to the function of setting rate.

Please describe more about _WHY_ of this patch. Does it fix any bug, or
enhance some thing, or a new feature?

Regards,
CK

> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index b5ed6b7..68b124f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> @@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_POSDIV_MASK);
> +	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IC),
>  			  RG_HTPLL_IC_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IR),
> @@ -223,7 +222,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> @@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);

Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/mediatek: move the setting of fixed divider

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> move the setting of fixed divider from enable/disable
> to the function of setting rate.

Please describe more about _WHY_ of this patch. Does it fix any bug, or
enhance some thing, or a new feature?

Regards,
CK

> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index b5ed6b7..68b124f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> @@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_POSDIV_MASK);
> +	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IC),
>  			  RG_HTPLL_IC_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IR),
> @@ -223,7 +222,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> @@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/mediatek: move the setting of fixed divider

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> move the setting of fixed divider from enable/disable
> to the function of setting rate.

Please describe more about _WHY_ of this patch. Does it fix any bug, or
enhance some thing, or a new feature?

Regards,
CK

> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index b5ed6b7..68b124f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> @@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_POSDIV_MASK);
> +	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IC),
>  			  RG_HTPLL_IC_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IR),
> @@ -223,7 +222,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> @@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
>  	usleep_range(80, 100);
>  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);

Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/mediatek: move the setting of fixed divider

[Chunhui Dai]

On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 16:28 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Chunhui:
> 
> On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> > move the setting of fixed divider from enable/disable
> > to the function of setting rate.
> 
> Please describe more about _WHY_ of this patch. Does it fix any bug, or
> enhance some thing, or a new feature?

.recalc_rate would calculate the clock rate by get the setting of
hardward. the bit which modify in this patch, would affect the clock
divider. we need to do the modify of this bit before ".recal_rate".So,
we move it to the ops of clock. Otherwise, the .recalc_rate would get
wrong setting of divider, and return wrong rate.
we would describe more in the V2.

> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > index b5ed6b7..68b124f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> > @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> > @@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >  
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_POSDIV_MASK);
> > +	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IC),
> >  			  RG_HTPLL_IC_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IR),
> > @@ -223,7 +222,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> > @@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/mediatek: move the setting of fixed divider

[Chunhui Dai]

On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 16:28 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Chunhui:
> 
> On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> > move the setting of fixed divider from enable/disable
> > to the function of setting rate.
> 
> Please describe more about _WHY_ of this patch. Does it fix any bug, or
> enhance some thing, or a new feature?

.recalc_rate would calculate the clock rate by get the setting of
hardward. the bit which modify in this patch, would affect the clock
divider. we need to do the modify of this bit before ".recal_rate".So,
we move it to the ops of clock. Otherwise, the .recalc_rate would get
wrong setting of divider, and return wrong rate.
we would describe more in the V2.

> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > index b5ed6b7..68b124f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> > @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> > @@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >  
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_POSDIV_MASK);
> > +	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IC),
> >  			  RG_HTPLL_IC_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IR),
> > @@ -223,7 +222,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> > @@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/mediatek: move the setting of fixed divider

[Chunhui Dai]

On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 16:28 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Chunhui:
> 
> On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> > move the setting of fixed divider from enable/disable
> > to the function of setting rate.
> 
> Please describe more about _WHY_ of this patch. Does it fix any bug, or
> enhance some thing, or a new feature?

.recalc_rate would calculate the clock rate by get the setting of
hardward. the bit which modify in this patch, would affect the clock
divider. we need to do the modify of this bit before ".recal_rate".So,
we move it to the ops of clock. Otherwise, the .recalc_rate would get
wrong setting of divider, and return wrong rate.
we would describe more in the V2.

> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > index b5ed6b7..68b124f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> > @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> > @@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >  
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_PREDIV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, RG_HTPLL_POSDIV_MASK);
> > +	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IC),
> >  			  RG_HTPLL_IC_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_mask(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON6, (0x1 << RG_HTPLL_IR),
> > @@ -223,7 +222,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_set_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> > @@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_DRV_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_PRED_MASK);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SER_MASK);
> > -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_EN_TX_POSDIV);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON2, RG_HDMITX_MBIAS_LPF_EN);
> >  	usleep_range(80, 100);
> >  	mtk_hdmi_phy_clear_bits(hdmi_phy, HDMI_CON0, RG_HDMITX_EN_SLDO_MASK);
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/mediatek: using different flags of clk for HDMI phy

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> The parent rate of hdmi phy had set by DPI driver.

The difference of DPI driver in MT8173 and MT2701 is

static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
};

static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt2701_conf = {
	.cal_factor = mt2701_calculate_factor,
	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xb0,
	.edge_sel_en = true,
};

Which one influence the phy setting?

Regards,
CK

> We should not set or change the parent rate of MT2701 hdmi phy,
> as a result we should remove the flags of "CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT"
> from the clock of MT2701 hdmi phy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        | 13 +++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 79e737d..c0a9cf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -109,13 +109,11 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>  		return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_ops(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy,
> -				     const struct clk_ops **ops)
> +static void mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_data(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy,
> +				     struct clk_init_data *clk_init)
>  {
> -	if (hdmi_phy && hdmi_phy->conf && hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops)
> -		*ops = hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
> -	else
> -		dev_err(hdmi_phy->dev, "Failed to get clk ops of phy\n");
> +	clk_init->flags = hdmi_phy->conf->flags;
> +	clk_init->ops = hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
>  }
>  
>  static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -128,7 +126,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct clk_init_data clk_init = {
>  		.num_parents = 1,
>  		.parent_names = (const char * const *)&ref_clk_name,
> -		.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	};
>  
>  	struct phy *phy;
> @@ -166,7 +163,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	hdmi_phy->dev = dev;
>  	hdmi_phy->conf =
>  		(struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_ops(hdmi_phy, &clk_init.ops);
> +	mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_data(hdmi_phy, &clk_init);
>  	hdmi_phy->pll_hw.init = &clk_init;
>  	hdmi_phy->pll = devm_clk_register(dev, &hdmi_phy->pll_hw);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hdmi_phy->pll)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index fdad8b1..446e2ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf {
>  	bool tz_disabled;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	const struct clk_ops *hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
>  	void (*hdmi_phy_enable_tmds)(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy);
>  	void (*hdmi_phy_disable_tmds)(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index 68b124f..a28a32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_2701_conf = {
>  	.tz_disabled = true,
> +	.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	.hdmi_phy_clk_ops = &mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops,
>  	.hdmi_phy_enable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds,
>  	.hdmi_phy_disable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index cb23c1e..63dde42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  }
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf = {
> +	.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	.hdmi_phy_clk_ops = &mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops,
>  	.hdmi_phy_enable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds,
>  	.hdmi_phy_disable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds,

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/mediatek: using different flags of clk for HDMI phy

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> The parent rate of hdmi phy had set by DPI driver.

The difference of DPI driver in MT8173 and MT2701 is

static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
};

static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt2701_conf = {
	.cal_factor = mt2701_calculate_factor,
	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xb0,
	.edge_sel_en = true,
};

Which one influence the phy setting?

Regards,
CK

> We should not set or change the parent rate of MT2701 hdmi phy,
> as a result we should remove the flags of "CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT"
> from the clock of MT2701 hdmi phy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        | 13 +++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 79e737d..c0a9cf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -109,13 +109,11 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>  		return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_ops(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy,
> -				     const struct clk_ops **ops)
> +static void mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_data(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy,
> +				     struct clk_init_data *clk_init)
>  {
> -	if (hdmi_phy && hdmi_phy->conf && hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops)
> -		*ops = hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
> -	else
> -		dev_err(hdmi_phy->dev, "Failed to get clk ops of phy\n");
> +	clk_init->flags = hdmi_phy->conf->flags;
> +	clk_init->ops = hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
>  }
>  
>  static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -128,7 +126,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct clk_init_data clk_init = {
>  		.num_parents = 1,
>  		.parent_names = (const char * const *)&ref_clk_name,
> -		.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	};
>  
>  	struct phy *phy;
> @@ -166,7 +163,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	hdmi_phy->dev = dev;
>  	hdmi_phy->conf =
>  		(struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_ops(hdmi_phy, &clk_init.ops);
> +	mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_data(hdmi_phy, &clk_init);
>  	hdmi_phy->pll_hw.init = &clk_init;
>  	hdmi_phy->pll = devm_clk_register(dev, &hdmi_phy->pll_hw);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hdmi_phy->pll)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index fdad8b1..446e2ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf {
>  	bool tz_disabled;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	const struct clk_ops *hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
>  	void (*hdmi_phy_enable_tmds)(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy);
>  	void (*hdmi_phy_disable_tmds)(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index 68b124f..a28a32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_2701_conf = {
>  	.tz_disabled = true,
> +	.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	.hdmi_phy_clk_ops = &mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops,
>  	.hdmi_phy_enable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds,
>  	.hdmi_phy_disable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index cb23c1e..63dde42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  }
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf = {
> +	.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	.hdmi_phy_clk_ops = &mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops,
>  	.hdmi_phy_enable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds,
>  	.hdmi_phy_disable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds,



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/mediatek: using different flags of clk for HDMI phy

[CK Hu]

Hi, Chunhui:

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, chunhui dai wrote:
> The parent rate of hdmi phy had set by DPI driver.

The difference of DPI driver in MT8173 and MT2701 is

static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
};

static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt2701_conf = {
	.cal_factor = mt2701_calculate_factor,
	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xb0,
	.edge_sel_en = true,
};

Which one influence the phy setting?

Regards,
CK

> We should not set or change the parent rate of MT2701 hdmi phy,
> as a result we should remove the flags of "CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT"
> from the clock of MT2701 hdmi phy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c        | 13 +++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h        |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> index 79e737d..c0a9cf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -109,13 +109,11 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>  		return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_ops(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy,
> -				     const struct clk_ops **ops)
> +static void mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_data(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy,
> +				     struct clk_init_data *clk_init)
>  {
> -	if (hdmi_phy && hdmi_phy->conf && hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops)
> -		*ops = hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
> -	else
> -		dev_err(hdmi_phy->dev, "Failed to get clk ops of phy\n");
> +	clk_init->flags = hdmi_phy->conf->flags;
> +	clk_init->ops = hdmi_phy->conf->hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
>  }
>  
>  static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -128,7 +126,6 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct clk_init_data clk_init = {
>  		.num_parents = 1,
>  		.parent_names = (const char * const *)&ref_clk_name,
> -		.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	};
>  
>  	struct phy *phy;
> @@ -166,7 +163,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	hdmi_phy->dev = dev;
>  	hdmi_phy->conf =
>  		(struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -	mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_ops(hdmi_phy, &clk_init.ops);
> +	mtk_hdmi_phy_clk_get_data(hdmi_phy, &clk_init);
>  	hdmi_phy->pll_hw.init = &clk_init;
>  	hdmi_phy->pll = devm_clk_register(dev, &hdmi_phy->pll_hw);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hdmi_phy->pll)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> index fdad8b1..446e2ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_phy.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf {
>  	bool tz_disabled;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	const struct clk_ops *hdmi_phy_clk_ops;
>  	void (*hdmi_phy_enable_tmds)(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy);
>  	void (*hdmi_phy_disable_tmds)(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> index 68b124f..a28a32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt2701_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_2701_conf = {
>  	.tz_disabled = true,
> +	.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	.hdmi_phy_clk_ops = &mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops,
>  	.hdmi_phy_enable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds,
>  	.hdmi_phy_disable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> index cb23c1e..63dde42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mt8173_hdmi_phy.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy)
>  }
>  
>  struct mtk_hdmi_phy_conf mtk_hdmi_phy_8173_conf = {
> +	.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
>  	.hdmi_phy_clk_ops = &mtk_hdmi_phy_pll_ops,
>  	.hdmi_phy_enable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_enable_tmds,
>  	.hdmi_phy_disable_tmds = mtk_hdmi_phy_disable_tmds,


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Matthias Brugger]

On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
>  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
>  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
>  	bool edge_sel_en;
> +	bool dual_edge;
>  };
>  
>  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
>  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);
>  }
>  
> +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)

I think it is clearer if you rename the function to something like:
mtk_dpi_enable_dual_edge and call it in mtk_dpi_set_display_mode if
dpi->conf->dual_edge is true.

Regards,
Matthias

> +{
> +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)
>  {
> @@ -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
>  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
>  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
>  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
>  		return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock)
> +{
> +	if (clock <= 27000)
> +		return 8;
> +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> +		return 4;
> +	else
> +		return 2;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
>  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
>  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
>  	.edge_sel_en = true,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> +	.dual_edge = true,
> +};
> +
>  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
>  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
>  	},
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> +	},
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Matthias Brugger]

On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
>  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
>  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
>  	bool edge_sel_en;
> +	bool dual_edge;
>  };
>  
>  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
>  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);
>  }
>  
> +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)

I think it is clearer if you rename the function to something like:
mtk_dpi_enable_dual_edge and call it in mtk_dpi_set_display_mode if
dpi->conf->dual_edge is true.

Regards,
Matthias

> +{
> +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)
>  {
> @@ -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
>  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
>  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
>  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
>  		return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock)
> +{
> +	if (clock <= 27000)
> +		return 8;
> +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> +		return 4;
> +	else
> +		return 2;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
>  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
>  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
>  	.edge_sel_en = true,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> +	.dual_edge = true,
> +};
> +
>  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
>  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
>  	},
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> +	},
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Jitao Shi]

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:58 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> > DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> >  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> >  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> >  	bool edge_sel_en;
> > +	bool dual_edge;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> >  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> 
> I think it is clearer if you rename the function to something like:
> mtk_dpi_enable_dual_edge and call it in mtk_dpi_set_display_mode if
> dpi->conf->dual_edge is true.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

I'll fix it in next patch.

Best Regards
Jitao

> > +{
> > +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> > +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)
> >  {
> > @@ -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> > +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
> >  		return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock)
> > +{
> > +	if (clock <= 27000)
> > +		return 8;
> > +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> > +		return 4;
> > +	else
> > +		return 2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> >  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> >  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
> >  	.edge_sel_en = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> > +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> > +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > +	.dual_edge = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> >  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> > +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> > +	},
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> >  
> > 

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Jitao Shi]

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:58 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> > DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> >  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> >  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> >  	bool edge_sel_en;
> > +	bool dual_edge;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> >  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> 
> I think it is clearer if you rename the function to something like:
> mtk_dpi_enable_dual_edge and call it in mtk_dpi_set_display_mode if
> dpi->conf->dual_edge is true.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

I'll fix it in next patch.

Best Regards
Jitao

> > +{
> > +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> > +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)
> >  {
> > @@ -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> > +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
> >  		return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock)
> > +{
> > +	if (clock <= 27000)
> > +		return 8;
> > +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> > +		return 4;
> > +	else
> > +		return 2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> >  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> >  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
> >  	.edge_sel_en = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> > +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> > +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > +	.dual_edge = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> >  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> > +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> > +	},
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> >  
> > 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Jitao Shi]

On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:58 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/01/2019 08:03, chunhui dai wrote:
> > DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> >  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> >  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> >  	bool edge_sel_en;
> > +	bool dual_edge;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> >  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi)
> 
> I think it is clearer if you rename the function to something like:
> mtk_dpi_enable_dual_edge and call it in mtk_dpi_set_display_mode if
> dpi->conf->dual_edge is true.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

I'll fix it in next patch.

Best Regards
Jitao

> > +{
> > +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> > +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)
> >  {
> > @@ -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> > +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
> >  		return 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock)
> > +{
> > +	if (clock <= 27000)
> > +		return 8;
> > +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> > +		return 4;
> > +	else
> > +		return 2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> >  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> >  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int clock)
> >  	.edge_sel_en = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> > +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> > +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > +	.dual_edge = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> >  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> > +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> > +	},
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> >  
> > 


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

RE: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[CK Hu (胡俊光)]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/html, Size: 6672 bytes --]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 3669 bytes --]

Hi, Chunhui:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: chunhui dai [mailto:chunhui.dai@mediatek.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 3:04 PM
> To: --to=Michael Turquette; Stephen Boyd; CK Hu (ºú¿¡¹â)
> Cc: Matthias Brugger; Philipp Zabel; David Airlie; Chunhui Dai (´÷´ºêÍ); Sean
> Wang; Ryder Lee (Àî¸ýÖV); Colin Ian King; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> srv_heupstream; Bibby Hsieh (Öxúßh); JamesJJ Liao (Áν¨ÖÇ); Jitao Shi (ʯ¼Ç
> ÌÎ)
> Subject: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support
> 
> DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.

This patch looks like a patch for MT8183. For MT8173 and MT2701, dual_edge is false.
For now, we have not support MT8183 yet.
So you could just set dual_edge to false and remove MT8183 part in this patch.
You could send the MT8183 part in an independent patch, not in a series of MT2701.

Regards,
CK

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
>  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
>  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
>  	bool edge_sel_en;
> +	bool dual_edge;
>  };
> 
>  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct
> mtk_dpi *dpi)
>  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);  }
> 
> +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi) {
> +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)  { @@
> -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
>  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
>  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
>  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
>  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> 
>  	return 0;
> @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> clock)
>  		return 1;
>  }
> 
> +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock) {
> +	if (clock <= 27000)
> +		return 8;
> +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> +		return 4;
> +	else
> +		return 2;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
>  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
>  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> clock)
>  	.edge_sel_en = true,
>  };
> 
> +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> +	.dual_edge = true,
> +};
> +
>  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
>  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
>  	},
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> +	},
>  	{ },
>  };
> 
> --
> 1.9.1


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Jitao Shi]

Hi CK,

Ok, I'll send it again in an independent patch.

Best Regards
Jitao

On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 14:52 +0800, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> Hi, Chunhui:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: chunhui dai [mailto:chunhui.dai@mediatek.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 3:04 PM
> > To: --to=Michael Turquette; Stephen Boyd; CK Hu (胡俊光)
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger; Philipp Zabel; David Airlie; Chunhui Dai (戴春晖); Sean
> > Wang; Ryder Lee (李庚諺); Colin Ian King; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > srv_heupstream; Bibby Hsieh (謝濟遠); JamesJJ Liao (廖建智); Jitao Shi (石记
> > 涛)
> > Subject: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support
> > 
> > DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> 
> This patch looks like a patch for MT8183. For MT8173 and MT2701, dual_edge is false.
> For now, we have not support MT8183 yet.
> So you could just set dual_edge to false and remove MT8183 part in this patch.
> You could send the MT8183 part in an independent patch, not in a series of MT2701.
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> >  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> >  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> >  	bool edge_sel_en;
> > +	bool dual_edge;
> >  };
> > 
> >  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct
> > mtk_dpi *dpi)
> >  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);  }
> > 
> > +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi) {
> > +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> > +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)  { @@
> > -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> > +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> > clock)
> >  		return 1;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock) {
> > +	if (clock <= 27000)
> > +		return 8;
> > +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> > +		return 4;
> > +	else
> > +		return 2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> >  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> >  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> > clock)
> >  	.edge_sel_en = true,
> >  };
> > 
> > +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> > +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> > +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > +	.dual_edge = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> >  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> > +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> > +	},
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> > 
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> 

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Jitao Shi]

Hi CK,

Ok, I'll send it again in an independent patch.

Best Regards
Jitao

On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 14:52 +0800, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> Hi, Chunhui:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: chunhui dai [mailto:chunhui.dai@mediatek.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 3:04 PM
> > To: --to=Michael Turquette; Stephen Boyd; CK Hu (胡俊光)
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger; Philipp Zabel; David Airlie; Chunhui Dai (戴春晖); Sean
> > Wang; Ryder Lee (李庚諺); Colin Ian King; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > srv_heupstream; Bibby Hsieh (謝濟遠); JamesJJ Liao (廖建智); Jitao Shi (石记
> > 涛)
> > Subject: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support
> > 
> > DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> 
> This patch looks like a patch for MT8183. For MT8173 and MT2701, dual_edge is false.
> For now, we have not support MT8183 yet.
> So you could just set dual_edge to false and remove MT8183 part in this patch.
> You could send the MT8183 part in an independent patch, not in a series of MT2701.
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> >  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> >  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> >  	bool edge_sel_en;
> > +	bool dual_edge;
> >  };
> > 
> >  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct
> > mtk_dpi *dpi)
> >  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);  }
> > 
> > +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi) {
> > +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> > +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)  { @@
> > -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> > +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> > clock)
> >  		return 1;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock) {
> > +	if (clock <= 27000)
> > +		return 8;
> > +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> > +		return 4;
> > +	else
> > +		return 2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> >  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> >  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> > clock)
> >  	.edge_sel_en = true,
> >  };
> > 
> > +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> > +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> > +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > +	.dual_edge = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> >  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> > +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> > +	},
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> > 
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support

[Jitao Shi]

Hi CK,

Ok, I'll send it again in an independent patch.

Best Regards
Jitao

On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 14:52 +0800, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> Hi, Chunhui:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: chunhui dai [mailto:chunhui.dai@mediatek.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 3:04 PM
> > To: --to=Michael Turquette; Stephen Boyd; CK Hu (胡俊光)
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger; Philipp Zabel; David Airlie; Chunhui Dai (戴春晖); Sean
> > Wang; Ryder Lee (李庚諺); Colin Ian King; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> > srv_heupstream; Bibby Hsieh (謝濟遠); JamesJJ Liao (廖建智); Jitao Shi (石记
> > 涛)
> > Subject: [PATCH 9/9] drm/mediatek: add dpi dual edge support
> > 
> > DPI sample on rising and falling edge. It can reduce half data io.
> 
> This patch looks like a patch for MT8183. For MT8173 and MT2701, dual_edge is false.
> For now, we have not support MT8183 yet.
> So you could just set dual_edge to false and remove MT8183 part in this patch.
> You could send the MT8183 part in an independent patch, not in a series of MT2701.
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: chunhui dai <chunhui.dai@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 30
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index 4a2f4a6..acb4f47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> >  	unsigned int (*cal_factor)(int clock);
> >  	u32 reg_h_fre_con;
> >  	bool edge_sel_en;
> > +	bool dual_edge;
> >  };
> > 
> >  static void mtk_dpi_mask(struct mtk_dpi *dpi, u32 offset, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > @@ -353,6 +354,15 @@ static void mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(struct
> > mtk_dpi *dpi)
> >  		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, dpi->conf->reg_h_fre_con, 0, EDGE_SEL_EN);  }
> > 
> > +static void mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi) {
> > +	if (dpi->conf->dual_edge) {
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN |
> > +				DDR_4PHASE, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE);
> > +		mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, EDGE_SEL, EDGE_SEL);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mtk_dpi_config_color_format(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  					enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format format)  { @@
> > -509,6 +519,7 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct mtk_dpi *dpi,
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> > +	mtk_dpi_config_dual_edge(dpi);
> >  	mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -669,6 +680,16 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> > clock)
> >  		return 1;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int clock) {
> > +	if (clock <= 27000)
> > +		return 8;
> > +	else if (clock <= 167000)
> > +		return 4;
> > +	else
> > +		return 2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8173_conf = {
> >  	.cal_factor = mt8173_calculate_factor,
> >  	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > @@ -680,6 +701,12 @@ static unsigned int mt2701_calculate_factor(int
> > clock)
> >  	.edge_sel_en = true,
> >  };
> > 
> > +static const struct mtk_dpi_conf mt8183_conf = {
> > +	.cal_factor = mt8183_calculate_factor,
> > +	.reg_h_fre_con = 0xe0,
> > +	.dual_edge = true,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_dpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -775,6 +802,9 @@ static int mtk_dpi_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dpi",
> >  	  .data = &mt8173_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dpi",
> > +	  .data = &mt8183_conf,
> > +	},
> >  	{ },
> >  };
> > 
> > --
> > 1.9.1
>