All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, jose.abreu@synopsys.com,
	nelson.costa@synopsys.com, dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com,
	sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, shawn.wen@rock-chips.com,
	nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
	hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, kernel@collabora.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add device tree support for HDMI RX Controller
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 21:20:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6040170.44csPzL39Z@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45138-65e76d00-9-580ee380@232156106>

Hi again :-)

Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 20:05:02 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> On Tuesday, March 05, 2024 19:41 IST, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 13:36:46 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> > > Add device tree support for Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX
> > > Controller.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > > Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2 :-
> > >   - Fix some of the checkpatch errors and warnings
> > >   - Rename resets, vo1-grf and HPD
> > >   - Move hdmirx_cma node to the rk3588.dtsi file
> > > 
> > >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi     | 41 ++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi      | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
> > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > index 5519c1430cb7..8adb98b99701 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,24 @@
> > >  #include "rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi"
> > >  
> > >  / {
> > > +	reserved-memory {
> > > +		#address-cells = <2>;
> > > +		#size-cells = <2>;
> > > +		ranges;
> > 
> > add blank line here
> > 
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * The 4k HDMI capture controller works only with 32bit
> > > +		 * phys addresses and doesn't support IOMMU. HDMI RX CMA
> > > +		 * must be reserved below 4GB.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		hdmirx_cma: hdmirx_cma {
> > 
> > phandles use "_", but node-names "-"
> > 
> > > +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > > +			alloc-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>;
> > > +			size = <0x0 (160 * 0x100000)>; /* 160MiB */
> > 
> > The comment above that node, could elaborate where the value of 160MB
> > originates from. I assume it is to hold n-times of 4K frames or whatever,
> > but it would be helpful for people to be able to read that.
> > 
> 
> right, we did the following calculation to come up with this value :-
> 3840 * 2160 * 4 (bytes/pix) * 2 (frames/buffer) / 1000 / 1000 = 66M
> and then we do the 2x times of this value to be on the safer side
> and support all practical use-cases.
> 
> I'll add some more details to the comment in v3.

thanks, that will be helpful for me and everybody reading the dts later on

> 
> > 
> > > +			no-map;
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > > +		};
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > >  	pcie30_phy_grf: syscon@fd5b8000 {
> > >  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy-grf", "syscon";
> > >  		reg = <0x0 0xfd5b8000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > > @@ -85,6 +103,38 @@ i2s10_8ch: i2s@fde00000 {
> > >  		status = "disabled";
> > >  	};
> > >  
> > > +	hdmi_receiver: hdmi-receiver@fdee0000 {
> > 
> > Maybe rename the label to "hdmirx:" ... that way in a board enabling the
> > cma region, both nodes would stay close to each other?
> > 
> 
> Umm we already have receiver in the name so I am not sure if adding rx will be
> a good idea. I was trying to keep it consistent with the names used in other device tree files.
> In case you still feel otherwise then do let me know, I'll make the change.

I'm somewhat partial to the actual name, I was more getting at similar
names to keep things together.

General sorting rules are that &foo phandles are sorted alphabetically
in board devicetrees.

So having

&hdmirx {
	status = "okay";
};

&hdmirx_cma {
	status = "okay";
};

in the board dt, makes them stay together automatically ;-)

So if it's hdmirx + hdmirx_cma or hdmi_receiver + hdmi_receiver_cma
doesn't matter that much, just that they share a common basename.


I really want to stay away from allowing special rules for things as much
as possible, because that becomes a neverending story, so it's
alphabetical sorting.

But nothing prevents us from naming phandles in an intelligent way ;-) .


Thanks
Heiko

> > > +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-hdmirx-ctrler", "snps,dw-hdmi-rx";
> > > +		reg = <0x0 0xfdee0000 0x0 0x6000>;
> > > +		power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_VO1>;
> > > +		rockchip,grf = <&sys_grf>;
> > > +		rockchip,vo1-grf = <&vo1_grf>;
> > > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 177 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > > +			     <GIC_SPI 436 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > > +			     <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > > +		interrupt-names = "cec", "hdmi", "dma";
> > > +		clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_AUD>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_CR_PARA>,
> > > +			 <&cru PCLK_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_REF>,
> > > +			 <&cru PCLK_S_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru HCLK_VO1>;
> > > +		clock-names = "aclk",
> > > +			      "audio",
> > > +			      "cr_para",
> > > +			      "pclk",
> > > +			      "ref",
> > > +			      "hclk_s_hdmirx",
> > > +			      "hclk_vo1";
> > 
> > the driver uses of_reserved_mem_device_init(), so doesn't this node need
> > a "memory-region = <&hdmirx_cma>; or similar?
> > 
> 
> yes, we should have the memory-region property here. My bad, I'll correct this in v3.
> 
> > 
> > > +		resets = <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX>, <&cru SRST_P_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru SRST_HDMIRX_REF>, <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX_BIU>;
> > > +		reset-names = "axi", "apb", "ref", "biu";
> > > +		pinctrl-0 = <&hdmim1_rx>;
> > > +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > +		status = "disabled";
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > >  	pcie3x4: pcie@fe150000 {
> > >  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie", "rockchip,rk3568-pcie";
> > >  		#address-cells = <3>;
> > > @@ -339,3 +389,8 @@ pcie30phy: phy@fee80000 {
> > >  		status = "disabled";
> > >  	};
> > >  };
> > > +
> > > +&hdmirx_cma {
> > > +	status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > 
> > I'd assume a board that enables &hdmi_receiver would also enable hdmirx_cma
> > and not the soc dtsi for _all_ boards?
> > 
> 
> Actually this node should be in the rock-5b.dts file instead of here.
> v1 had it correct but I made a mistake in v2 :(
> Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix this and send a v3 soon.





WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, jose.abreu@synopsys.com,
	nelson.costa@synopsys.com, dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com,
	sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, shawn.wen@rock-chips.com,
	nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
	hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, kernel@collabora.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add device tree support for HDMI RX Controller
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 21:20:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6040170.44csPzL39Z@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45138-65e76d00-9-580ee380@232156106>

Hi again :-)

Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 20:05:02 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> On Tuesday, March 05, 2024 19:41 IST, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 13:36:46 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> > > Add device tree support for Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX
> > > Controller.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > > Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2 :-
> > >   - Fix some of the checkpatch errors and warnings
> > >   - Rename resets, vo1-grf and HPD
> > >   - Move hdmirx_cma node to the rk3588.dtsi file
> > > 
> > >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi     | 41 ++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi      | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
> > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > index 5519c1430cb7..8adb98b99701 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,24 @@
> > >  #include "rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi"
> > >  
> > >  / {
> > > +	reserved-memory {
> > > +		#address-cells = <2>;
> > > +		#size-cells = <2>;
> > > +		ranges;
> > 
> > add blank line here
> > 
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * The 4k HDMI capture controller works only with 32bit
> > > +		 * phys addresses and doesn't support IOMMU. HDMI RX CMA
> > > +		 * must be reserved below 4GB.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		hdmirx_cma: hdmirx_cma {
> > 
> > phandles use "_", but node-names "-"
> > 
> > > +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > > +			alloc-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>;
> > > +			size = <0x0 (160 * 0x100000)>; /* 160MiB */
> > 
> > The comment above that node, could elaborate where the value of 160MB
> > originates from. I assume it is to hold n-times of 4K frames or whatever,
> > but it would be helpful for people to be able to read that.
> > 
> 
> right, we did the following calculation to come up with this value :-
> 3840 * 2160 * 4 (bytes/pix) * 2 (frames/buffer) / 1000 / 1000 = 66M
> and then we do the 2x times of this value to be on the safer side
> and support all practical use-cases.
> 
> I'll add some more details to the comment in v3.

thanks, that will be helpful for me and everybody reading the dts later on

> 
> > 
> > > +			no-map;
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > > +		};
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > >  	pcie30_phy_grf: syscon@fd5b8000 {
> > >  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy-grf", "syscon";
> > >  		reg = <0x0 0xfd5b8000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > > @@ -85,6 +103,38 @@ i2s10_8ch: i2s@fde00000 {
> > >  		status = "disabled";
> > >  	};
> > >  
> > > +	hdmi_receiver: hdmi-receiver@fdee0000 {
> > 
> > Maybe rename the label to "hdmirx:" ... that way in a board enabling the
> > cma region, both nodes would stay close to each other?
> > 
> 
> Umm we already have receiver in the name so I am not sure if adding rx will be
> a good idea. I was trying to keep it consistent with the names used in other device tree files.
> In case you still feel otherwise then do let me know, I'll make the change.

I'm somewhat partial to the actual name, I was more getting at similar
names to keep things together.

General sorting rules are that &foo phandles are sorted alphabetically
in board devicetrees.

So having

&hdmirx {
	status = "okay";
};

&hdmirx_cma {
	status = "okay";
};

in the board dt, makes them stay together automatically ;-)

So if it's hdmirx + hdmirx_cma or hdmi_receiver + hdmi_receiver_cma
doesn't matter that much, just that they share a common basename.


I really want to stay away from allowing special rules for things as much
as possible, because that becomes a neverending story, so it's
alphabetical sorting.

But nothing prevents us from naming phandles in an intelligent way ;-) .


Thanks
Heiko

> > > +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-hdmirx-ctrler", "snps,dw-hdmi-rx";
> > > +		reg = <0x0 0xfdee0000 0x0 0x6000>;
> > > +		power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_VO1>;
> > > +		rockchip,grf = <&sys_grf>;
> > > +		rockchip,vo1-grf = <&vo1_grf>;
> > > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 177 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > > +			     <GIC_SPI 436 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > > +			     <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > > +		interrupt-names = "cec", "hdmi", "dma";
> > > +		clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_AUD>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_CR_PARA>,
> > > +			 <&cru PCLK_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_REF>,
> > > +			 <&cru PCLK_S_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru HCLK_VO1>;
> > > +		clock-names = "aclk",
> > > +			      "audio",
> > > +			      "cr_para",
> > > +			      "pclk",
> > > +			      "ref",
> > > +			      "hclk_s_hdmirx",
> > > +			      "hclk_vo1";
> > 
> > the driver uses of_reserved_mem_device_init(), so doesn't this node need
> > a "memory-region = <&hdmirx_cma>; or similar?
> > 
> 
> yes, we should have the memory-region property here. My bad, I'll correct this in v3.
> 
> > 
> > > +		resets = <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX>, <&cru SRST_P_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru SRST_HDMIRX_REF>, <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX_BIU>;
> > > +		reset-names = "axi", "apb", "ref", "biu";
> > > +		pinctrl-0 = <&hdmim1_rx>;
> > > +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > +		status = "disabled";
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > >  	pcie3x4: pcie@fe150000 {
> > >  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie", "rockchip,rk3568-pcie";
> > >  		#address-cells = <3>;
> > > @@ -339,3 +389,8 @@ pcie30phy: phy@fee80000 {
> > >  		status = "disabled";
> > >  	};
> > >  };
> > > +
> > > +&hdmirx_cma {
> > > +	status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > 
> > I'd assume a board that enables &hdmi_receiver would also enable hdmirx_cma
> > and not the soc dtsi for _all_ boards?
> > 
> 
> Actually this node should be in the rock-5b.dts file instead of here.
> v1 had it correct but I made a mistake in v2 :(
> Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix this and send a v3 soon.





_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, jose.abreu@synopsys.com,
	nelson.costa@synopsys.com, dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com,
	sebastian.reichel@collabora.com, shawn.wen@rock-chips.com,
	nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
	hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, kernel@collabora.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add device tree support for HDMI RX Controller
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 21:20:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6040170.44csPzL39Z@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45138-65e76d00-9-580ee380@232156106>

Hi again :-)

Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 20:05:02 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> On Tuesday, March 05, 2024 19:41 IST, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 13:36:46 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> > > Add device tree support for Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX
> > > Controller.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > > Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@rock-chips.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2 :-
> > >   - Fix some of the checkpatch errors and warnings
> > >   - Rename resets, vo1-grf and HPD
> > >   - Move hdmirx_cma node to the rk3588.dtsi file
> > > 
> > >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi     | 41 ++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi      | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
> > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > index 5519c1430cb7..8adb98b99701 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,24 @@
> > >  #include "rk3588-pinctrl.dtsi"
> > >  
> > >  / {
> > > +	reserved-memory {
> > > +		#address-cells = <2>;
> > > +		#size-cells = <2>;
> > > +		ranges;
> > 
> > add blank line here
> > 
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * The 4k HDMI capture controller works only with 32bit
> > > +		 * phys addresses and doesn't support IOMMU. HDMI RX CMA
> > > +		 * must be reserved below 4GB.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		hdmirx_cma: hdmirx_cma {
> > 
> > phandles use "_", but node-names "-"
> > 
> > > +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > > +			alloc-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>;
> > > +			size = <0x0 (160 * 0x100000)>; /* 160MiB */
> > 
> > The comment above that node, could elaborate where the value of 160MB
> > originates from. I assume it is to hold n-times of 4K frames or whatever,
> > but it would be helpful for people to be able to read that.
> > 
> 
> right, we did the following calculation to come up with this value :-
> 3840 * 2160 * 4 (bytes/pix) * 2 (frames/buffer) / 1000 / 1000 = 66M
> and then we do the 2x times of this value to be on the safer side
> and support all practical use-cases.
> 
> I'll add some more details to the comment in v3.

thanks, that will be helpful for me and everybody reading the dts later on

> 
> > 
> > > +			no-map;
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > > +		};
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > >  	pcie30_phy_grf: syscon@fd5b8000 {
> > >  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie3-phy-grf", "syscon";
> > >  		reg = <0x0 0xfd5b8000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > > @@ -85,6 +103,38 @@ i2s10_8ch: i2s@fde00000 {
> > >  		status = "disabled";
> > >  	};
> > >  
> > > +	hdmi_receiver: hdmi-receiver@fdee0000 {
> > 
> > Maybe rename the label to "hdmirx:" ... that way in a board enabling the
> > cma region, both nodes would stay close to each other?
> > 
> 
> Umm we already have receiver in the name so I am not sure if adding rx will be
> a good idea. I was trying to keep it consistent with the names used in other device tree files.
> In case you still feel otherwise then do let me know, I'll make the change.

I'm somewhat partial to the actual name, I was more getting at similar
names to keep things together.

General sorting rules are that &foo phandles are sorted alphabetically
in board devicetrees.

So having

&hdmirx {
	status = "okay";
};

&hdmirx_cma {
	status = "okay";
};

in the board dt, makes them stay together automatically ;-)

So if it's hdmirx + hdmirx_cma or hdmi_receiver + hdmi_receiver_cma
doesn't matter that much, just that they share a common basename.


I really want to stay away from allowing special rules for things as much
as possible, because that becomes a neverending story, so it's
alphabetical sorting.

But nothing prevents us from naming phandles in an intelligent way ;-) .


Thanks
Heiko

> > > +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-hdmirx-ctrler", "snps,dw-hdmi-rx";
> > > +		reg = <0x0 0xfdee0000 0x0 0x6000>;
> > > +		power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_VO1>;
> > > +		rockchip,grf = <&sys_grf>;
> > > +		rockchip,vo1-grf = <&vo1_grf>;
> > > +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 177 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > > +			     <GIC_SPI 436 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> > > +			     <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > > +		interrupt-names = "cec", "hdmi", "dma";
> > > +		clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_AUD>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_CR_PARA>,
> > > +			 <&cru PCLK_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru CLK_HDMIRX_REF>,
> > > +			 <&cru PCLK_S_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru HCLK_VO1>;
> > > +		clock-names = "aclk",
> > > +			      "audio",
> > > +			      "cr_para",
> > > +			      "pclk",
> > > +			      "ref",
> > > +			      "hclk_s_hdmirx",
> > > +			      "hclk_vo1";
> > 
> > the driver uses of_reserved_mem_device_init(), so doesn't this node need
> > a "memory-region = <&hdmirx_cma>; or similar?
> > 
> 
> yes, we should have the memory-region property here. My bad, I'll correct this in v3.
> 
> > 
> > > +		resets = <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX>, <&cru SRST_P_HDMIRX>,
> > > +			 <&cru SRST_HDMIRX_REF>, <&cru SRST_A_HDMIRX_BIU>;
> > > +		reset-names = "axi", "apb", "ref", "biu";
> > > +		pinctrl-0 = <&hdmim1_rx>;
> > > +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > +		status = "disabled";
> > > +	};
> > > +
> > >  	pcie3x4: pcie@fe150000 {
> > >  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-pcie", "rockchip,rk3568-pcie";
> > >  		#address-cells = <3>;
> > > @@ -339,3 +389,8 @@ pcie30phy: phy@fee80000 {
> > >  		status = "disabled";
> > >  	};
> > >  };
> > > +
> > > +&hdmirx_cma {
> > > +	status = "okay";
> > > +};
> > 
> > I'd assume a board that enables &hdmi_receiver would also enable hdmirx_cma
> > and not the soc dtsi for _all_ boards?
> > 
> 
> Actually this node should be in the rock-5b.dts file instead of here.
> v1 had it correct but I made a mistake in v2 :(
> Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix this and send a v3 soon.





_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05 12:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX Controller Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: reset: Define reset id used for HDMI Receiver Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 15:02   ` Rob Herring
2024-03-05 15:02     ` Rob Herring
2024-03-05 15:02     ` Rob Herring
2024-03-05 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] clk: rockchip: rst-rk3588: Add reset line " Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: media: Document HDMI RX Controller Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 15:03   ` Rob Herring
2024-03-05 15:03     ` Rob Herring
2024-03-05 15:03     ` Rob Herring
2024-03-05 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add device tree support for " Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 14:11   ` Heiko Stübner
2024-03-05 14:11     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-03-05 14:11     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-03-05 19:05     ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 19:05       ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 19:05       ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 20:20       ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-03-05 20:20         ` Heiko Stübner
2024-03-05 20:20         ` Heiko Stübner
2024-03-06 19:28         ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-06 19:28           ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-06 19:28           ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] media: platform: synopsys: Add support for hdmi input driver Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX Driver Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel
2024-03-05 12:36   ` Shreeya Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6040170.44csPzL39Z@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nelson.costa@synopsys.com \
    --cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=shawn.wen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=shreeya.patel@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.