All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	 "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-techboard] DPDK ABI/API Stability
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 14:21:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60afc83fc723050914d617461607a9c5a72d3017.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3055e4ce-767b-ab43-43ac-c3604fd3ea5c@ashroe.eu>

On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 14:05 +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> > > Question for Kevin, Luca and others who look at distro-packaging: 
> > > is
> > > it the
> > > case that each distro will only ship one version of DPDK, or is
> > > it
> > > possible
> > > that if we have ABI breaks, a distro will provide two copies of
> > > DPDK
> > > simultaneously, e.g. a 19.11 ABI version and a 20.11 ABI version?
> > 
> > We can ship multiple versions, although it's more work so there
> > should
> > be a good reason to do it. 
> 
> Well you already kind of do right.
> You ship 16.11.8 with Debian 9 and then 18.11 with Debian 9
> backports.

Yes indeed - backports has a different policy and is not part of
"Debian main" - for example, stability and security support are not
guaranteed. Also there is no guarantee of compatibility of co-
installability - while you can have the individual libraries from each
version at the same time, you can't have both libdpdk-dev packages
which are necessary to build an application. So you have to choose and
install either libdpdk-dev=16.11 or libdpdk-dev=18.11.

It is possible to have multiple versions in the same archive at the
same time, and with multiple -dev packages, and that's what I meant
when I mentioned it was more work.

> > At the moment in Debian and Ubuntu we don't,
> > and we tend to ship whatever the latest LTS version is at the
> > distro
> > freeze milestone - for example Debian 10 which will be released
> > soon
> > (TM) will have 18.11.0.
> 
> Presumably when 19.11 arrives, it will land in Debian 10 backports
> similarly.
> 
> I assume anything that lands in backports is not guaranteed to be ABI
> compatible with stable?

Yes, there's no guarantee.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-03 15:42 DPDK ABI/API Stability Ray Kinsella
2019-04-03 19:53 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-04  9:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-04 10:54   ` [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2019-04-04 12:02     ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-04 13:05       ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-04 13:10         ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:25           ` [dpdk-dev] " Ray Kinsella
2019-04-07  9:37             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 13:21         ` Luca Boccassi [this message]
2019-04-04 12:52     ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-04 14:07       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-07  9:48         ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-08  9:04           ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-08 10:15             ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-08 13:00               ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-08 13:38                 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-08 13:58                   ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 14:02                     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-08 14:38                       ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 15:13                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 15:49                         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-10  8:35                           ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 15:50                         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-09  9:42                   ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-14  0:42             ` Neil Horman
2019-04-15  9:10               ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-04 15:51     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-04 16:37       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-04 16:56     ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-04 19:08       ` Wiles, Keith
2019-04-04 20:13         ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-05 13:30           ` [dpdk-dev] " Ray Kinsella
2019-04-05 13:29         ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-04  9:47 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-04 13:16   ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-10  5:14 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10  9:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10  9:43   ` [dpdk-dev] " Luca Boccassi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60afc83fc723050914d617461607a9c5a72d3017.camel@debian.org \
    --to=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.