From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
techboard@dpdk.org,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] DPDK ABI/API Stability
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wLD22Oxe-EHESKuReM1VScx7B0aU+i1fVMDXLUH0sEbA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a9bf695-b287-9e5e-358c-d6c3f93db045@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:39 PM Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
wrote:
> As a concrete proposal, my number one dream would be to see multiprocess
> gone. I also recall desire for "DPDK to be more lightweight", and i
> maintain that DPDK *cannot* be lightweight if we are to support
> multiprocess - we can have one or the other, but not both. However,
> realistically, i don't think dropping multiprocess is ever going to
> happen - not only it is too entrenched in DPDK use cases, it is actually
> quite useful despite its flaws.
>
Well, honestly, I'd like to hear about this.
What are the real usecases for multi process support?
Do we have even a single opensource project that uses it?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 15:42 DPDK ABI/API Stability Ray Kinsella
2019-04-03 19:53 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-04 9:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-04 10:54 ` [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2019-04-04 12:02 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-04 13:05 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-04 13:10 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-05 13:25 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ray Kinsella
2019-04-07 9:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 13:21 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-04 12:52 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-04 14:07 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-07 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-08 9:04 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-08 10:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-08 13:00 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-08 13:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-08 13:58 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-04-08 14:02 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-08 14:38 ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 15:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 15:49 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-10 8:35 ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 15:50 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-09 9:42 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-14 0:42 ` Neil Horman
2019-04-15 9:10 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-04 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-04 16:37 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-04 16:56 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-04 19:08 ` Wiles, Keith
2019-04-04 20:13 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-05 13:30 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ray Kinsella
2019-04-05 13:29 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-04 9:47 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-04-04 13:16 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-04-10 5:14 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-10 9:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 9:43 ` [dpdk-dev] " Luca Boccassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wLD22Oxe-EHESKuReM1VScx7B0aU+i1fVMDXLUH0sEbA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.