From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> To: <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>, <nsaenzju@redhat.com>, <cmirabil@redhat.com>, <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <serge@raspberrypi.org>, <mbrugger@suse.com>, <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <fedora-rpi@googlegroups.com>, <dbauman@redhat.com>, <mguma@redhat.com>, <jsavitz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:03:26 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4719fce9-4235-f1d7-f95e-67e5a47a0968@i2se.com> On 26/04/2022 12:48, Stefan Wahren wrote: > Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne: >> Hi Charles, Miguel, >> >> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote: >>> Hi Miguel— >>> >>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up. >>> >>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained >>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux- >>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks! >> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I >> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if >> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have >> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers. > Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please give him the common 2 weeks for a review. You have one from Krzysztof on the bindings, that should be sufficient? https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#open-firmware-and-flattened-device-tree-bindings >> >> I'll do a last review during the week. >> >> Regards, >>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com> To: <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>, <nsaenzju@redhat.com>, <cmirabil@redhat.com>, <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <serge@raspberrypi.org>, <mbrugger@suse.com>, <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <fedora-rpi@googlegroups.com>, <dbauman@redhat.com>, <mguma@redhat.com>, <jsavitz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:03:26 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4719fce9-4235-f1d7-f95e-67e5a47a0968@i2se.com> On 26/04/2022 12:48, Stefan Wahren wrote: > Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne: >> Hi Charles, Miguel, >> >> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote: >>> Hi Miguel— >>> >>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up. >>> >>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained >>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux- >>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks! >> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I >> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if >> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have >> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers. > Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please give him the common 2 weeks for a review. You have one from Krzysztof on the bindings, that should be sufficient? https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#open-firmware-and-flattened-device-tree-bindings >> >> I'll do a last review during the week. >> >> Regards, >> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 12:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-04-19 20:51 [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] drivers/mfd: sensehat: Add Raspberry Pi Sense HAT to simple_mfd_i2c Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] drivers/input/joystick: sensehat: Raspberry Pi Sense HAT joystick driver Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-05-31 1:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-05-31 1:26 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-05-31 1:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2022-05-31 1:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2022-05-31 2:14 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-05-31 2:14 ` Randy Dunlap 2022-04-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] drivers/auxdisplay: sensehat: Raspberry Pi Sense HAT display driver Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-05-04 17:22 ` Pavel Machek 2022-05-04 17:22 ` Pavel Machek 2022-04-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: sensehat: Add Raspberry Pi Sense HAT schema Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-04-20 6:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-04-20 6:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2022-04-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] MAINTAINERS: Add sensehat driver authors to MAINTAINERS Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] DO NOT MERGE: full sensehat device tree overlay for raspberry pi 4 Charles Mirabile 2022-04-19 20:51 ` Charles Mirabile 2022-04-22 14:17 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver Miguel Ojeda 2022-04-22 14:17 ` Miguel Ojeda [not found] ` <CABe3_aE-nQzZazLfxk1OnCNRF0sDqcWi6gieYSf4O4aYS_Ahog@mail.gmail.com> 2022-04-26 10:18 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne 2022-04-26 10:18 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne 2022-04-26 11:48 ` Stefan Wahren 2022-04-26 11:48 ` Stefan Wahren 2022-04-26 12:03 ` Conor.Dooley [this message] 2022-04-26 12:03 ` Conor.Dooley 2022-04-26 15:12 ` Stefan Wahren 2022-04-26 15:12 ` Stefan Wahren 2022-06-23 5:48 ` Stefan Wahren 2022-06-23 5:48 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com \ --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --cc=cmirabil@redhat.com \ --cc=dbauman@redhat.com \ --cc=fedora-rpi@googlegroups.com \ --cc=jsavitz@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \ --cc=mguma@redhat.com \ --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \ --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \ --cc=serge@raspberrypi.org \ --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.