* arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
@ 2021-07-19 15:05 kernelci.org bot
2021-07-20 12:53 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernelci.org bot @ 2021-07-19 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, catalin.marinas, linux-arm-kernel, kernel-build-reports,
kernelci-results
arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/arm64/branch/for-kernelci/kernel/arm64-fixes/
Tree: arm64
Branch: for-kernelci
Git Describe: arm64-fixes
Git Commit: e6f85cbeb23bd74b8966cf1f15bf7d01399ff625
Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
Built: 1 unique architecture
Build Failure Detected:
arm64:
allmodconfig: (gcc-8) FAIL
Errors and Warnings Detected:
arm64:
allmodconfig (gcc-8): 2 errors, 1 warning
Errors summary:
1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1864’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
Warnings summary:
1 kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c:1461:8: warning: ‘main’ is usually a function [-Wmain]
================================================================================
Detailed per-defconfig build reports:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
allmodconfig (arm64, gcc-8) — FAIL, 2 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches
Errors:
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1864’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
Warnings:
kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c:1461:8: warning: ‘main’ is usually a function [-Wmain]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
defconfig (arm64, gcc-8) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches
---
For more info write to <info@kernelci.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
2021-07-19 15:05 arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes) kernelci.org bot
@ 2021-07-20 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-20 14:00 ` Guillaume Tucker
2021-07-20 14:13 ` Robin Murphy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2021-07-20 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelci.org bot
Cc: catalin.marinas, linux-arm-kernel, kernel-build-reports,
kernelci-results
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:05:20AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
>
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/arm64/branch/for-kernelci/kernel/arm64-fixes/
>
> Tree: arm64
> Branch: for-kernelci
> Git Describe: arm64-fixes
> Git Commit: e6f85cbeb23bd74b8966cf1f15bf7d01399ff625
> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> Built: 1 unique architecture
>
> Build Failure Detected:
>
> arm64:
> allmodconfig: (gcc-8) FAIL
>
> Errors and Warnings Detected:
>
> arm64:
> allmodconfig (gcc-8): 2 errors, 1 warning
>
> Errors summary:
>
> 1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1864’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
> 1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
Hmm, is there a way to find out more information about which assertion is
causing the problem here? I'm not able to reproduce this locally, the branch
in question has now been merged upstream and I can't see anything in there
which would trigger this.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
2021-07-20 12:53 ` Will Deacon
@ 2021-07-20 14:00 ` Guillaume Tucker
2021-07-20 14:13 ` Robin Murphy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guillaume Tucker @ 2021-07-20 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon, kernelci.org bot
Cc: catalin.marinas, kernelci-results, linux-arm-kernel,
kernel-build-reports
On 20/07/2021 13:53, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:05:20AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
>>
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/arm64/branch/for-kernelci/kernel/arm64-fixes/
>>
>> Tree: arm64
>> Branch: for-kernelci
>> Git Describe: arm64-fixes
>> Git Commit: e6f85cbeb23bd74b8966cf1f15bf7d01399ff625
>> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>> Built: 1 unique architecture
>>
>> Build Failure Detected:
>>
>> arm64:
>> allmodconfig: (gcc-8) FAIL
>>
>> Errors and Warnings Detected:
>>
>> arm64:
>> allmodconfig (gcc-8): 2 errors, 1 warning
>>
>> Errors summary:
>>
>> 1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1864’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
>> 1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
>
> Hmm, is there a way to find out more information about which assertion is
> causing the problem here? I'm not able to reproduce this locally, the branch
> in question has now been merged upstream and I can't see anything in there
> which would trigger this.
It's true that each section about a particular build could have a
link to the page on the dashboard with all the details, that's
something to improve.
The way to find things out right now is to start with the main
link from the top of the email report, which shows all the builds
for this kernel revision:
https://kernelci.org/build/arm64/branch/for-kernelci/kernel/arm64-fixes/
Then you can see the ones with errors, including the allmodconfig one:
https://linux.kernelci.org/build/id/60f59321f76d8d0f141160be/
There's also a direct link to the logs, and then it takes a bit
of manual hunting. The error mentioned here can be found in the
modules build log:
https://storage.kernelci.org/arm64/for-kernelci/arm64-fixes/arm64/allmodconfig/gcc-8/logs/modules.log
In file included from ../include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:5,
from ../arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:23,
from ../include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:7,
from ../arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:29,
from ../include/linux/bitops.h:32,
from ../include/linux/of.h:15,
from ../include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from ../include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from ../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:33:
In function ‘modify_qp_init_to_rtr’,
inlined from ‘hns_roce_v2_set_abs_fields’ at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4798:9,
inlined from ‘hns_roce_v2_modify_qp’ at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:5001:8:
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
I guess you could take a look at allmodconfig build logs from
linux-next now it's merged, to see if it's also there.
Hope that helps.
Best wishes,
Guillaume
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
2021-07-20 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-20 14:00 ` Guillaume Tucker
@ 2021-07-20 14:13 ` Robin Murphy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2021-07-20 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon, kernelci.org bot
Cc: catalin.marinas, linux-arm-kernel, kernel-build-reports,
kernelci-results
On 2021-07-20 13:53, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:05:20AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes)
>>
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/arm64/branch/for-kernelci/kernel/arm64-fixes/
>>
>> Tree: arm64
>> Branch: for-kernelci
>> Git Describe: arm64-fixes
>> Git Commit: e6f85cbeb23bd74b8966cf1f15bf7d01399ff625
>> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>> Built: 1 unique architecture
>>
>> Build Failure Detected:
>>
>> arm64:
>> allmodconfig: (gcc-8) FAIL
>>
>> Errors and Warnings Detected:
>>
>> arm64:
>> allmodconfig (gcc-8): 2 errors, 1 warning
>>
>> Errors summary:
>>
>> 1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1864’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
>> 1 ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
>
> Hmm, is there a way to find out more information about which assertion is
> causing the problem here? I'm not able to reproduce this locally, the branch
> in question has now been merged upstream and I can't see anything in there
> which would trigger this.
If you dig down into the raw logs it eventually appears to be the HNS
inifiniband driver:
In file included from ../include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:5,
from ../arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:23,
from ../include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:7,
from ../arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:29,
from ../include/linux/bitops.h:32,
from ../include/linux/of.h:15,
from ../include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
from ../include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from ../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:33:
In function ‘modify_qp_init_to_rtr’,
inlined from ‘hns_roce_v2_set_abs_fields’ at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4798:9,
inlined from ‘hns_roce_v2_modify_qp’ at ../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:5001:8:
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1857’ declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value too large for the field
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
../include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:33:51: note: in definition of macro ‘__cpu_to_le32’
#define __cpu_to_le32(x) ((__force __le32)(__u32)(x))
^
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:316:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
__compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:328:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/bitfield.h:49:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ? \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/bitfield.h:94:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘__BF_FIELD_CHECK’
__BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: "); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h:91:52: note: in expansion of macro ‘FIELD_PREP’
*((__le32 *)ptr + (field_h) / 32) |= cpu_to_le32(FIELD_PREP( \
^~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_common.h:95:39: note: in expansion of macro ‘_hr_reg_write’
#define hr_reg_write(ptr, field, val) _hr_reg_write(ptr, field, val)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:4422:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘hr_reg_write’
hr_reg_write(context, QPC_LP_PKTN_INI, lp_pktn_ini);
^~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't see that it has much to do with the arm64 tree though :/
Robin.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-20 14:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-19 15:05 arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 2 errors, 1 warning (arm64-fixes) kernelci.org bot
2021-07-20 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-20 14:00 ` Guillaume Tucker
2021-07-20 14:13 ` Robin Murphy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.