* Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
@ 2011-02-18 2:44 domiel forty-two
2011-02-18 7:08 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: domiel forty-two @ 2011-02-18 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1266 bytes --]
Hi all!
Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?
TIA
________________________________
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
> This is the seventh patch series.
Thanks for this. I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
(hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
for patches 1-8.
Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
Cheers,
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2598 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
2011-02-18 2:44 Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85 domiel forty-two
@ 2011-02-18 7:08 ` Keir Fraser
2011-02-18 8:01 ` domiel forty-two
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2011-02-18 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: domiel forty-two, xen-devel
On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
> suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?
Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is
branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1.
-- Keir
> TIA
>
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
> From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
> To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
> <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
> Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
>> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
>> This is the seventh patch series.
>
> Thanks for this. I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
> (hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
> for patches 1-8.
>
> Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
> branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
2011-02-18 7:08 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2011-02-18 8:01 ` domiel forty-two
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: domiel forty-two @ 2011-02-18 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser, xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1673 bytes --]
Keir,
Thanks for the clarification.
D.
________________________________
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: domiel forty-two <domiel42@yahoo.com.au>; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Sent: Fri, 18 February, 2011 6:08:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
> suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?
Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is
branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1.
-- Keir
> TIA
>
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
> From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
> To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
> <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
> Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
>> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
>> This is the seventh patch series.
>
> Thanks for this. I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
> (hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
> for patches 1-8.
>
> Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
> branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3273 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-18 8:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-18 2:44 Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85 domiel forty-two
2011-02-18 7:08 ` Keir Fraser
2011-02-18 8:01 ` domiel forty-two
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.