* FW: patchtest: failure
@ 2017-05-23 12:04 Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:12 ` Burton, Ross
2017-05-23 13:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Levy @ 2017-05-23 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
The patch applies correctly on my Linux development system but I'm having to copy it to a Windows PC and use Outlook to submit it because the Linux system has no access to email. I can only suppose that's why I get these errors. How do I fix this?
Alan Levy
ALAN LEVY, Lead Consultant, Embedded Systems
Plextek Consulting, The Plextek Building, London Road, Great Chesterford, Saffron Walden, CB10 1NY, UK
T: +44 (0) 1799 533200 E: alan.levy@plextek.com W: www.plextek.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Patchwork [mailto:patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org]
Sent: 23 May 2017 13:02
To: Alan Levy
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: ✗ patchtest: failure for base.bbclass: improve error message for missing host tools (rev2)
== Series Details ==
Series: base.bbclass: improve error message for missing host tools (rev2)
Revision: 2
URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/6859/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
* Issue Series cannot be parsed correctly due to malformed diff lines [test_mbox_format]
Suggested fix Create the series again using git-format-patch and ensure it can be applied using git am
Diff line
* Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch [test_series_merge_on_head]
Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch
Targeted branch master (currently at ee55b5685a)
If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns.
Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> [PATCH v3] -> ...).
---
Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: patchtest: failure
2017-05-23 12:04 FW: patchtest: failure Alan Levy
@ 2017-05-23 13:12 ` Burton, Ross
2017-05-23 13:24 ` Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-05-23 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Levy; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 521 bytes --]
On 23 May 2017 at 13:04, Alan Levy <alan.levy@plextek.com> wrote:
> The patch applies correctly on my Linux development system but I'm having
> to copy it to a Windows PC and use Outlook to submit it because the Linux
> system has no access to email. I can only suppose that's why I get these
> errors. How do I fix this?
>
Yes, the line endings being changed will be the problem. You could
register a gmail account or similar and send through that (git send-email
can talk directly to GMail SMTP).
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 927 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: patchtest: failure
2017-05-23 12:04 FW: patchtest: failure Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:12 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2017-05-23 13:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2017-05-23 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core, Alan Levy
On 05/23/2017 03:04 PM, Alan Levy wrote:
> The patch applies correctly on my Linux development system but I'm
> having to copy it to a Windows PC and use Outlook to submit it
> because the Linux system has no access to email. I can only suppose
> that's why I get these errors. How do I fix this?
You only need access to any smtp server from the Linux machine; using
'git send-email' does not require configuring access to an email account.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: patchtest: failure
2017-05-23 13:12 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2017-05-23 13:24 ` Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:26 ` Burton, Ross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Levy @ 2017-05-23 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1791 bytes --]
Ross,
Thanks for the advice. What I belatedly realised was that I was using HTML format rather than plain text and that was losing some of the formatting in the process. I re-sent it in plain text and this time it hasn’t been rejected (yet). Also, I wasn’t 100% certain whether the system would accept a patch from an email address that wasn’t the same as the one the patch was signed with. I can’t find any examples in the archive – would it actually work?
Regards
Alan
ALAN LEVY
Lead Consultant, Embedded Systems
Tel > +44 (0) 1799 533200
Email > alan.levy@plextek.com
[http://www.plextek.com/wp-content/uploads/Footer-AlanLevy.jpg]<http://www.plextek.com/technicalpaper/an-introduction-to-yocto/>
[http://www.plextek.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Plextek-LOGO-for-email.jpg]<http://www.plextek.com/>
www.plextek.com<http://www.plextek.com/>
The Plextek Building, London Road, Great Chesterford, Saffron Walden, CB10 1NY, UK
Plextek is the trading name of Plextek Services Ltd. Registered in England and Wales, no. 09826669
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.burton@intel.com]
Sent: 23 May 2017 14:13
To: Alan Levy
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] FW: patchtest: failure
On 23 May 2017 at 13:04, Alan Levy <alan.levy@plextek.com<mailto:alan.levy@plextek.com>> wrote:
The patch applies correctly on my Linux development system but I'm having to copy it to a Windows PC and use Outlook to submit it because the Linux system has no access to email. I can only suppose that's why I get these errors. How do I fix this?
Yes, the line endings being changed will be the problem. You could register a gmail account or similar and send through that (git send-email can talk directly to GMail SMTP).
Ross
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 8571 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image001.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 29779 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: image002.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 8414 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: patchtest: failure
2017-05-23 13:24 ` Alan Levy
@ 2017-05-23 13:26 ` Burton, Ross
2017-05-23 13:36 ` Alan Levy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-05-23 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Levy; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 687 bytes --]
On 23 May 2017 at 14:24, Alan Levy <alan.levy@plextek.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. What I belatedly realised was that I was using HTML
> format rather than plain text and that was losing some of the formatting in
> the process. I re-sent it in plain text and this time it hasn’t been
> rejected (yet). Also, I wasn’t 100% certain whether the system would accept
> a patch from an email address that wasn’t the same as the one the patch was
> signed with. I can’t find any examples in the archive – would it actually
> work?
>
>
I believe if you tell GMail that your work email is a valid alias it will
let you send from it though the SMTP server.
Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1191 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: patchtest: failure
2017-05-23 13:26 ` Burton, Ross
@ 2017-05-23 13:36 ` Alan Levy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Levy @ 2017-05-23 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 800 bytes --]
On 23 May 2017 at 14:24, Alan Levy <alan.levy@plextek.com<mailto:alan.levy@plextek.com>> wrote:
Thanks for the advice. What I belatedly realised was that I was using HTML format rather than plain text and that was losing some of the formatting in the process. I re-sent it in plain text and this time it hasn’t been rejected (yet). Also, I wasn’t 100% certain whether the system would accept a patch from an email address that wasn’t the same as the one the patch was signed with. I can’t find any examples in the archive – would it actually work?
I believe if you tell GMail that your work email is a valid alias it will let you send from it though the SMTP server.
Ross
Yes, if only our corporate firewall would actually let SMTP through; that was the other problem ☹.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4253 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-23 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-23 12:04 FW: patchtest: failure Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:12 ` Burton, Ross
2017-05-23 13:24 ` Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:26 ` Burton, Ross
2017-05-23 13:36 ` Alan Levy
2017-05-23 13:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.