All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: m.deepak@intel.com,
	Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
	<ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915: Add location of the Rcomp resistor to bxt_ddi_phy_info
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2016 19:22:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62d209950ad48484564f3e793cf247cf62572a39.1475770848.git-series.ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.d70d631f7f5a73a187167a165d5f1fef85aa2ff6.1475770848.git-series.ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.d70d631f7f5a73a187167a165d5f1fef85aa2ff6.1475770848.git-series.ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>

Use struct bxt_ddi_phy_info to hold information of where the Rcomp
resistor is located, instead of hard coding it in the init sequence.

Note that this moves the enabling of the phy with the Rcomp resistor out
of the power well enable code. That should be safe since
bxt_ddi_phy_init() is called while the power domains lock is held, and
that is the only way that function gets called, so there is no
possibility of a concurrent phy enable caused by a power domain get
call.

v2: Replace comment about lock with lockdep_assert_held()  (Imre)

Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c   | 72 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 15 +-----
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
index 1b1fba1..6711e3a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
@@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ struct bxt_ddi_phy_info {
 	bool dual_channel;
 
 	/**
+	 * @rcomp_phy: If -1, indicates this phy has its own rcomp resistor.
+	 * Otherwise the GRC value will be copied from the phy indicated by
+	 * this field.
+	 */
+	enum dpio_phy rcomp_phy;
+
+	/**
 	 * @channel: struct containing per channel information.
 	 */
 	struct {
@@ -137,6 +144,7 @@ struct bxt_ddi_phy_info {
 static const struct bxt_ddi_phy_info bxt_ddi_phy_info[] = {
 	[DPIO_PHY0] = {
 		.dual_channel = true,
+		.rcomp_phy = DPIO_PHY1,
 
 		.channel = {
 			[DPIO_CH0] = { .port = PORT_B },
@@ -145,6 +153,7 @@ static const struct bxt_ddi_phy_info bxt_ddi_phy_info[] = {
 	},
 	[DPIO_PHY1] = {
 		.dual_channel = false,
+		.rcomp_phy = -1,
 
 		.channel = {
 			[DPIO_CH0] = { .port = PORT_A },
@@ -214,9 +223,10 @@ bool bxt_ddi_phy_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	if (phy == DPIO_PHY1 &&
-	    !(I915_READ(BXT_PORT_REF_DW3(DPIO_PHY1)) & GRC_DONE)) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("DDI PHY 1 powered, but GRC isn't done\n");
+	if (phy_info->rcomp_phy == -1 &&
+	    !(I915_READ(BXT_PORT_REF_DW3(phy)) & GRC_DONE)) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("DDI PHY %d powered, but GRC isn't done\n",
+				 phy);
 
 		return false;
 	}
@@ -261,14 +271,15 @@ static void bxt_phy_wait_grc_done(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for PHY%d GRC\n", phy);
 }
 
-void bxt_ddi_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy)
+static void _bxt_ddi_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+			      enum dpio_phy phy)
 {
 	const struct bxt_ddi_phy_info *phy_info = &bxt_ddi_phy_info[phy];
 	u32 val;
 
 	if (bxt_ddi_phy_is_enabled(dev_priv, phy)) {
 		/* Still read out the GRC value for state verification */
-		if (phy == DPIO_PHY0)
+		if (phy_info->rcomp_phy != -1)
 			dev_priv->bxt_phy_grc = bxt_get_grc(dev_priv, phy);
 
 		if (bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(dev_priv, phy)) {
@@ -338,30 +349,32 @@ void bxt_ddi_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy)
 		val |= OCL2_LDOFUSE_PWR_DIS;
 	I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_CL1CM_DW30(phy), val);
 
-	if (phy == DPIO_PHY0) {
+	if (phy_info->rcomp_phy != -1) {
 		uint32_t grc_code;
 		/*
 		 * PHY0 isn't connected to an RCOMP resistor so copy over
 		 * the corresponding calibrated value from PHY1, and disable
 		 * the automatic calibration on PHY0.
 		 */
-		val = dev_priv->bxt_phy_grc = bxt_get_grc(dev_priv, DPIO_PHY1);
+		val = dev_priv->bxt_phy_grc = bxt_get_grc(dev_priv,
+							  phy_info->rcomp_phy);
 		grc_code = val << GRC_CODE_FAST_SHIFT |
 			   val << GRC_CODE_SLOW_SHIFT |
 			   val;
-		I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_REF_DW6(DPIO_PHY0), grc_code);
+		I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_REF_DW6(phy), grc_code);
 
-		val = I915_READ(BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(DPIO_PHY0));
+		val = I915_READ(BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(phy));
 		val |= GRC_DIS | GRC_RDY_OVRD;
-		I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(DPIO_PHY0), val);
+		I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(phy), val);
 	}
 
 	val = I915_READ(BXT_PHY_CTL_FAMILY(phy));
 	val |= COMMON_RESET_DIS;
 	I915_WRITE(BXT_PHY_CTL_FAMILY(phy), val);
 
-	if (phy == DPIO_PHY1)
-		bxt_phy_wait_grc_done(dev_priv, DPIO_PHY1);
+	if (phy_info->rcomp_phy == -1)
+		bxt_phy_wait_grc_done(dev_priv, phy);
+
 }
 
 void bxt_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy)
@@ -377,6 +390,31 @@ void bxt_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy)
 	I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON, val);
 }
 
+void bxt_ddi_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy)
+{
+	const struct bxt_ddi_phy_info *phy_info = &bxt_ddi_phy_info[phy];
+	enum dpio_phy rcomp_phy = phy_info->rcomp_phy;
+	bool was_enabled;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->power_domains.lock);
+
+	if (rcomp_phy != -1) {
+		was_enabled = bxt_ddi_phy_is_enabled(dev_priv, rcomp_phy);
+
+		/*
+		 * We need to copy the GRC calibration value from rcomp_phy,
+		 * so make sure it's powered up.
+		 */
+		if (!was_enabled)
+			_bxt_ddi_phy_init(dev_priv, rcomp_phy);
+	}
+
+	_bxt_ddi_phy_init(dev_priv, phy);
+
+	if (rcomp_phy != -1 && !was_enabled)
+		bxt_ddi_phy_uninit(dev_priv, phy_info->rcomp_phy);
+}
+
 static bool __printf(6, 7)
 __phy_reg_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpio_phy phy,
 		       i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask, u32 expected,
@@ -443,7 +481,7 @@ bool bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 * at least on stepping A this bit is read-only and fixed at 0.
 	 */
 
-	if (phy == DPIO_PHY0) {
+	if (phy_info->rcomp_phy != -1) {
 		u32 grc_code = dev_priv->bxt_phy_grc;
 
 		grc_code = grc_code << GRC_CODE_FAST_SHIFT |
@@ -451,12 +489,12 @@ bool bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			   grc_code;
 		mask = GRC_CODE_FAST_MASK | GRC_CODE_SLOW_MASK |
 		       GRC_CODE_NOM_MASK;
-		ok &= _CHK(BXT_PORT_REF_DW6(DPIO_PHY0), mask, grc_code,
-			    "BXT_PORT_REF_DW6(%d)", DPIO_PHY0);
+		ok &= _CHK(BXT_PORT_REF_DW6(phy), mask, grc_code,
+			    "BXT_PORT_REF_DW6(%d)", phy);
 
 		mask = GRC_DIS | GRC_RDY_OVRD;
-		ok &= _CHK(BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(DPIO_PHY0), mask, mask,
-			    "BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(%d)", DPIO_PHY0);
+		ok &= _CHK(BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(phy), mask, mask,
+			    "BXT_PORT_REF_DW8(%d)", phy);
 	}
 
 	return ok;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index d41fd46..3b38998 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -849,22 +849,7 @@ static void skl_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 static void bxt_dpio_cmn_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 					   struct i915_power_well *power_well)
 {
-	enum skl_disp_power_wells power_well_id = power_well->id;
-	struct i915_power_well *cmn_a_well = NULL;
-
-	if (power_well_id == BXT_DPIO_CMN_BC) {
-		/*
-		 * We need to copy the GRC calibration value from the eDP PHY,
-		 * so make sure it's powered up.
-		 */
-		cmn_a_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, BXT_DPIO_CMN_A);
-		intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, cmn_a_well);
-	}
-
 	bxt_ddi_phy_init(dev_priv, power_well->data);
-
-	if (cmn_a_well)
-		intel_power_well_put(dev_priv, cmn_a_well);
 }
 
 static void bxt_dpio_cmn_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-- 
git-series 0.8.10
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-06 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-06 16:22 [PATCH v2 0/9] Broxton ddi phy refactoring Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915: Rename struct i915_power_well field data to id Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915: Explicitly map broxton DPIO power wells to phys Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Pass lane count to bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_optmin_mask() Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915: Move broxton phy code to intel_dpio_phy.c Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915: Move DPIO phy documentation section " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915: Move broxton vswing sequence " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915: Create a struct to hold information about the broxton phys Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 16:22 ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira [this message]
2016-10-06 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915: Address broxton phy registers based on phy and channel number Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-07  7:28   ` [PATCH v3 " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-10 11:53     ` Imre Deak
2016-10-19  7:54       ` [PATCH v4 " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-19  7:59       ` [PATCH v5 " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2016-10-06 17:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Broxton ddi phy refactoring (rev2) Patchwork
2016-10-07  7:50 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Broxton ddi phy refactoring (rev3) Patchwork
2016-10-07  8:35 ` Patchwork
2016-10-19  9:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Broxton ddi phy refactoring (rev5) Patchwork
2016-10-19 16:56 ` Patchwork
2016-10-21 14:16   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-10-21 14:23     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-28 10:51       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-10-21 15:04     ` Chris Wilson
2016-10-28  9:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62d209950ad48484564f3e793cf247cf62572a39.1475770848.git-series.ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com \
    --to=ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=m.deepak@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.