[PATCH] fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()

[PATCH] fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()

[Li Jinlin]

I got an infinite loop and a WARNING report when executing a tail command
in virtiofs.

  WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 964 at fs/iomap/iter.c:34 iomap_iter+0x3a2/0x3d0
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 10 PID: 964 Comm: tail Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7
  Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dax_iomap_rw+0xea/0x620
  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
  fuse_dax_read_iter+0x47/0x80
  fuse_file_read_iter+0xae/0xd0
  new_sync_read+0xfe/0x180
  ? 0xffffffff81000000
  vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0
  ksys_read+0x6d/0xf0
  __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20
  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The tail command will call read() with a count of 0. In this case,
iomap_iter() will report this WARNING, and always return 1 which casuing
the infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw().

Fixing by checking count whether is 0 in dax_iomap_rw().

Fixes: ca289e0b95af ("fsdax: switch dax_iomap_rw to use iomap_iter")
Signed-off-by: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@huawei.com>
---
 fs/dax.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 4155a6107fa1..7ab248ed21aa 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -1241,6 +1241,9 @@ dax_iomap_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
 	loff_t done = 0;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (!iomi.len)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
 		lockdep_assert_held_write(&iomi.inode->i_rwsem);
 		iomi.flags |= IOMAP_WRITE;
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH] fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:20:50AM +0800, Li Jinlin wrote:
> I got an infinite loop and a WARNING report when executing a tail command
> in virtiofs.
> 
>   WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 964 at fs/iomap/iter.c:34 iomap_iter+0x3a2/0x3d0
>   Modules linked in:
>   CPU: 10 PID: 964 Comm: tail Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7
>   Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   dax_iomap_rw+0xea/0x620
>   ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>   fuse_dax_read_iter+0x47/0x80
>   fuse_file_read_iter+0xae/0xd0
>   new_sync_read+0xfe/0x180
>   ? 0xffffffff81000000
>   vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0
>   ksys_read+0x6d/0xf0
>   __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20
>   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> 
> The tail command will call read() with a count of 0. In this case,
> iomap_iter() will report this WARNING, and always return 1 which casuing
> the infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw().
> 
> Fixing by checking count whether is 0 in dax_iomap_rw().
> 
> Fixes: ca289e0b95af ("fsdax: switch dax_iomap_rw to use iomap_iter")
> Signed-off-by: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@huawei.com>

Huh, I didn't know FUSE supports DAX and iomap now...

> ---
>  fs/dax.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 4155a6107fa1..7ab248ed21aa 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -1241,6 +1241,9 @@ dax_iomap_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>  	loff_t done = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!iomi.len)
> +		return 0;

Hmm, most of the callers of dax_iomap_rw skip the whole call if
iov_iter_count(to)==0, so I wonder if fuse_dax_read_iter should do the
same?

That said, iomap_dio_rw bails early if you pass it iomi.len, so I don't
have any real objections to this.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D


> +
>  	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
>  		lockdep_assert_held_write(&iomi.inode->i_rwsem);
>  		iomi.flags |= IOMAP_WRITE;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

Re: [PATCH] fsdax: Fix infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw()

[Dan Williams]

Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:20:50AM +0800, Li Jinlin wrote:
> > I got an infinite loop and a WARNING report when executing a tail command
> > in virtiofs.
> > 
> >   WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 964 at fs/iomap/iter.c:34 iomap_iter+0x3a2/0x3d0
> >   Modules linked in:
> >   CPU: 10 PID: 964 Comm: tail Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7
> >   Call Trace:
> >   <TASK>
> >   dax_iomap_rw+0xea/0x620
> >   ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
> >   fuse_dax_read_iter+0x47/0x80
> >   fuse_file_read_iter+0xae/0xd0
> >   new_sync_read+0xfe/0x180
> >   ? 0xffffffff81000000
> >   vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0
> >   ksys_read+0x6d/0xf0
> >   __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20
> >   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
> >   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > 
> > The tail command will call read() with a count of 0. In this case,
> > iomap_iter() will report this WARNING, and always return 1 which casuing
> > the infinite loop in dax_iomap_rw().
> > 
> > Fixing by checking count whether is 0 in dax_iomap_rw().
> > 
> > Fixes: ca289e0b95af ("fsdax: switch dax_iomap_rw to use iomap_iter")
> > Signed-off-by: Li Jinlin <lijinlin3@huawei.com>
> 
> Huh, I didn't know FUSE supports DAX and iomap now...

Yeah, it came in via DAX support for virtio-fs.

> > ---
> >  fs/dax.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> > index 4155a6107fa1..7ab248ed21aa 100644
> > --- a/fs/dax.c
> > +++ b/fs/dax.c
> > @@ -1241,6 +1241,9 @@ dax_iomap_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >  	loff_t done = 0;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	if (!iomi.len)
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Hmm, most of the callers of dax_iomap_rw skip the whole call if
> iov_iter_count(to)==0, so I wonder if fuse_dax_read_iter should do the
> same?
> 
> That said, iomap_dio_rw bails early if you pass it iomi.len, so I don't
> have any real objections to this.

That was the same conclusion I came to...

> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Thanks, will get this merged up for v5.19-final.