All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/04/2021 17:37, Claire Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
>> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
>> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
>> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
>> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
>> being set.
> 
> debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
> duplication.
> I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
> debugfs should be enough?
> 
> if (!debugfs)
>      debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);

Yes that looks like a good solution to me. Although I'd name the 
variable something a bit more descriptive than just "debugfs" e.g. 
"debugfs_dir" or "debugfs_root".

Thanks,

Steve

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/04/2021 17:37, Claire Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
>> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
>> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
>> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
>> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
>> being set.
> 
> debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
> duplication.
> I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
> debugfs should be enough?
> 
> if (!debugfs)
>      debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);

Yes that looks like a good solution to me. Although I'd name the 
variable something a bit more descriptive than just "debugfs" e.g. 
"debugfs_dir" or "debugfs_root".

Thanks,

Steve

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/04/2021 17:37, Claire Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
>> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
>> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
>> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
>> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
>> being set.
> 
> debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
> duplication.
> I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
> debugfs should be enough?
> 
> if (!debugfs)
>      debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);

Yes that looks like a good solution to me. Although I'd name the 
variable something a bit more descriptive than just "debugfs" e.g. 
"debugfs_dir" or "debugfs_root".

Thanks,

Steve
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	mingo@kernel.org, sstabellini@kernel.org,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/04/2021 17:37, Claire Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
>> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
>> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
>> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
>> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
>> being set.
> 
> debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
> duplication.
> I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
> debugfs should be enough?
> 
> if (!debugfs)
>      debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);

Yes that looks like a good solution to me. Although I'd name the 
variable something a bit more descriptive than just "debugfs" e.g. 
"debugfs_dir" or "debugfs_root".

Thanks,

Steve
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/04/2021 17:37, Claire Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
>> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
>> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
>> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
>> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
>> being set.
> 
> debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
> duplication.
> I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
> debugfs should be enough?
> 
> if (!debugfs)
>      debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);

Yes that looks like a good solution to me. Although I'd name the 
variable something a bit more descriptive than just "debugfs" e.g. 
"debugfs_dir" or "debugfs_root".

Thanks,

Steve
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/04/2021 17:37, Claire Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
>> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
>> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
>> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
>> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
>> being set.
> 
> debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
> duplication.
> I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
> debugfs should be enough?
> 
> if (!debugfs)
>      debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);

Yes that looks like a good solution to me. Although I'd name the 
variable something a bit more descriptive than just "debugfs" e.g. 
"debugfs_dir" or "debugfs_root".

Thanks,

Steve
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 182+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-22  8:14 [PATCH v5 00/16] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] swiotlb: Fix the type of index Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23  7:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-23  7:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-23  7:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-23  7:11     ` [Nouveau] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-23  7:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23 11:34   ` Steven Price
2021-04-23 11:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Price
2021-04-23 11:34     ` Steven Price
2021-04-23 11:34     ` Steven Price
2021-04-23 11:34     ` [Nouveau] " Steven Price
2021-04-23 11:34     ` Steven Price
2021-04-26 16:37     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-28  9:50       ` Steven Price [this message]
2021-04-28  9:50         ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Price
2021-04-28  9:50         ` Steven Price
2021-04-28  9:50         ` Steven Price
2021-04-28  9:50         ` [Nouveau] " Steven Price
2021-04-28  9:50         ` Steven Price
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:31   ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:31     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:31     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:31     ` [Nouveau] " Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:31     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-26 16:37     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:37       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:46   ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:46     ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:46     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:46     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:46     ` [Nouveau] " Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:46     ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-03 14:26     ` Claire Chang
2021-05-03 14:26       ` Claire Chang
2021-05-03 14:26       ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-03 14:26       ` Claire Chang
2021-05-03 14:26       ` Claire Chang
2021-05-03 14:26       ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-05-03 14:26       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22 12:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-04-22 15:09   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-23  2:52   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52     ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:35   ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:35     ` [Intel-gfx] " Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:35     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:35     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:35     ` [Nouveau] " Robin Murphy
2021-04-23 13:35     ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-26 16:38     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:38       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:38       ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:38       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:38       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:38       ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-04-26 16:38       ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  9:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Restricted DMA Patchwork
2021-05-10  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] " Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53   ` Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53   ` [Intel-gfx] " Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53   ` Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53   ` Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53   ` [Nouveau] " Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53   ` Claire Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64137d13-cfa2-5f72-94c1-19b367489c78@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jxgao@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tientzu@chromium.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.