* [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface
@ 2021-11-02 2:20 ` Maíra Canal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maíra Canal @ 2021-11-02 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: inki.dae, jy0922.shim, sw0312.kim, kyungmin.park, airlied,
daniel, krzysztof.kozlowski
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel
Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
/of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 42 +++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
index 8d137857818c..b0b1acb7e712 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/of_graph.h>
#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
@@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi {
struct clk **clks;
struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
int irq;
- int te_gpio;
+ struct gpio_desc *te_gpio;
u32 pll_clk_rate;
u32 burst_clk_rate;
@@ -1298,14 +1297,14 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
enable_irq(dsi->irq);
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
- enable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
+ if (dsi->te_gpio)
+ enable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
}
static void exynos_dsi_disable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
- disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
+ if (dsi->te_gpio)
+ disable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
disable_irq(dsi->irq);
}
@@ -1335,29 +1334,20 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
int ret;
int te_gpio_irq;
- dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(panel->of_node, "te-gpios", 0);
- if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
- return 0;
-
- if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
- ret = dsi->te_gpio;
- dev_err(dsi->dev, "cannot get te-gpios, %d\n", ret);
+ dsi->te_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dsi->dev, "te", GPIOD_IN);
+ if (IS_ERR(dsi->te_gpio)) {
+ dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(dsi->te_gpio));
goto out;
}
- ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
- goto out;
- }
-
- te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
+ te_gpio_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "TE", dsi);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
- gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
+ gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
goto out;
}
@@ -1367,10 +1357,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
- free_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
- gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
- dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
+ if (dsi->te_gpio) {
+ free_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
+ gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
}
}
@@ -1745,9 +1734,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!dsi)
return -ENOMEM;
- /* To be checked as invalid one */
- dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
-
init_completion(&dsi->completed);
spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface
@ 2021-11-02 2:20 ` Maíra Canal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maíra Canal @ 2021-11-02 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: inki.dae, jy0922.shim, sw0312.kim, kyungmin.park, airlied,
daniel, krzysztof.kozlowski
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
/of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 42 +++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
index 8d137857818c..b0b1acb7e712 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/of_graph.h>
#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
@@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi {
struct clk **clks;
struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
int irq;
- int te_gpio;
+ struct gpio_desc *te_gpio;
u32 pll_clk_rate;
u32 burst_clk_rate;
@@ -1298,14 +1297,14 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
enable_irq(dsi->irq);
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
- enable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
+ if (dsi->te_gpio)
+ enable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
}
static void exynos_dsi_disable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
- disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
+ if (dsi->te_gpio)
+ disable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
disable_irq(dsi->irq);
}
@@ -1335,29 +1334,20 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
int ret;
int te_gpio_irq;
- dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(panel->of_node, "te-gpios", 0);
- if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
- return 0;
-
- if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
- ret = dsi->te_gpio;
- dev_err(dsi->dev, "cannot get te-gpios, %d\n", ret);
+ dsi->te_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dsi->dev, "te", GPIOD_IN);
+ if (IS_ERR(dsi->te_gpio)) {
+ dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(dsi->te_gpio));
goto out;
}
- ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
- goto out;
- }
-
- te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
+ te_gpio_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "TE", dsi);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
- gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
+ gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
goto out;
}
@@ -1367,10 +1357,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
- free_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
- gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
- dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
+ if (dsi->te_gpio) {
+ free_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
+ gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
}
}
@@ -1745,9 +1734,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!dsi)
return -ENOMEM;
- /* To be checked as invalid one */
- dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
-
init_completion(&dsi->completed);
spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface
@ 2021-11-02 2:20 ` Maíra Canal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maíra Canal @ 2021-11-02 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: inki.dae, jy0922.shim, sw0312.kim, kyungmin.park, airlied,
daniel, krzysztof.kozlowski
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel
Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
/of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 42 +++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
index 8d137857818c..b0b1acb7e712 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/of_graph.h>
#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
@@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi {
struct clk **clks;
struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
int irq;
- int te_gpio;
+ struct gpio_desc *te_gpio;
u32 pll_clk_rate;
u32 burst_clk_rate;
@@ -1298,14 +1297,14 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
enable_irq(dsi->irq);
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
- enable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
+ if (dsi->te_gpio)
+ enable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
}
static void exynos_dsi_disable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
- disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
+ if (dsi->te_gpio)
+ disable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
disable_irq(dsi->irq);
}
@@ -1335,29 +1334,20 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
int ret;
int te_gpio_irq;
- dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(panel->of_node, "te-gpios", 0);
- if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
- return 0;
-
- if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
- ret = dsi->te_gpio;
- dev_err(dsi->dev, "cannot get te-gpios, %d\n", ret);
+ dsi->te_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dsi->dev, "te", GPIOD_IN);
+ if (IS_ERR(dsi->te_gpio)) {
+ dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(dsi->te_gpio));
goto out;
}
- ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
- goto out;
- }
-
- te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
+ te_gpio_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "TE", dsi);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
- gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
+ gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
goto out;
}
@@ -1367,10 +1357,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
{
- if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
- free_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
- gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
- dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
+ if (dsi->te_gpio) {
+ free_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
+ gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
}
}
@@ -1745,9 +1734,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!dsi)
return -ENOMEM;
- /* To be checked as invalid one */
- dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
-
init_completion(&dsi->completed);
spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface
2021-11-02 2:20 ` Maíra Canal
(?)
@ 2021-11-09 8:45 ` Inki Dae
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Inki Dae @ 2021-11-09 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maíra Canal, jy0922.shim, sw0312.kim, kyungmin.park,
airlied, daniel, krzysztof.kozlowski
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel
Hi,
21. 11. 2. 오전 11:20에 Maíra Canal 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
> dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
> /of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
>
Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 42 +++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index 8d137857818c..b0b1acb7e712 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi {
> struct clk **clks;
> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> int irq;
> - int te_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *te_gpio;
>
> u32 pll_clk_rate;
> u32 burst_clk_rate;
> @@ -1298,14 +1297,14 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> enable_irq(dsi->irq);
>
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
> - enable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> + if (dsi->te_gpio)
> + enable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> }
>
> static void exynos_dsi_disable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
> - disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> + if (dsi->te_gpio)
> + disable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
>
> disable_irq(dsi->irq);
> }
> @@ -1335,29 +1334,20 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
> int ret;
> int te_gpio_irq;
>
> - dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(panel->of_node, "te-gpios", 0);
> - if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> - ret = dsi->te_gpio;
> - dev_err(dsi->dev, "cannot get te-gpios, %d\n", ret);
> + dsi->te_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dsi->dev, "te", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(dsi->te_gpio));
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
> + te_gpio_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
>
> ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "TE", dsi);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
> - gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
> + gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -1367,10 +1357,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
>
> static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
> - gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
> - dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
> + if (dsi->te_gpio) {
> + free_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
> + gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1745,9 +1734,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!dsi)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* To be checked as invalid one */
> - dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
> -
> init_completion(&dsi->completed);
> spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface
@ 2021-11-09 8:45 ` Inki Dae
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Inki Dae @ 2021-11-09 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maíra Canal, jy0922.shim, sw0312.kim, kyungmin.park,
airlied, daniel, krzysztof.kozlowski
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Hi,
21. 11. 2. 오전 11:20에 Maíra Canal 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
> dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
> /of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
>
Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 42 +++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index 8d137857818c..b0b1acb7e712 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi {
> struct clk **clks;
> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> int irq;
> - int te_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *te_gpio;
>
> u32 pll_clk_rate;
> u32 burst_clk_rate;
> @@ -1298,14 +1297,14 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> enable_irq(dsi->irq);
>
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
> - enable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> + if (dsi->te_gpio)
> + enable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> }
>
> static void exynos_dsi_disable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
> - disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> + if (dsi->te_gpio)
> + disable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
>
> disable_irq(dsi->irq);
> }
> @@ -1335,29 +1334,20 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
> int ret;
> int te_gpio_irq;
>
> - dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(panel->of_node, "te-gpios", 0);
> - if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> - ret = dsi->te_gpio;
> - dev_err(dsi->dev, "cannot get te-gpios, %d\n", ret);
> + dsi->te_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dsi->dev, "te", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(dsi->te_gpio));
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
> + te_gpio_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
>
> ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "TE", dsi);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
> - gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
> + gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -1367,10 +1357,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
>
> static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
> - gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
> - dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
> + if (dsi->te_gpio) {
> + free_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
> + gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1745,9 +1734,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!dsi)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* To be checked as invalid one */
> - dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
> -
> init_completion(&dsi->completed);
> spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface
@ 2021-11-09 8:45 ` Inki Dae
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Inki Dae @ 2021-11-09 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maíra Canal, jy0922.shim, sw0312.kim, kyungmin.park,
airlied, daniel, krzysztof.kozlowski
Cc: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel
Hi,
21. 11. 2. 오전 11:20에 Maíra Canal 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
> dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
> /of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
>
Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 42 +++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index 8d137857818c..b0b1acb7e712 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi {
> struct clk **clks;
> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> int irq;
> - int te_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *te_gpio;
>
> u32 pll_clk_rate;
> u32 burst_clk_rate;
> @@ -1298,14 +1297,14 @@ static void exynos_dsi_enable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> enable_irq(dsi->irq);
>
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
> - enable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> + if (dsi->te_gpio)
> + enable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> }
>
> static void exynos_dsi_disable_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio))
> - disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
> + if (dsi->te_gpio)
> + disable_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio));
>
> disable_irq(dsi->irq);
> }
> @@ -1335,29 +1334,20 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
> int ret;
> int te_gpio_irq;
>
> - dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(panel->of_node, "te-gpios", 0);
> - if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> - ret = dsi->te_gpio;
> - dev_err(dsi->dev, "cannot get te-gpios, %d\n", ret);
> + dsi->te_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dsi->dev, "te", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(dsi->te_gpio));
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
> + te_gpio_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
>
> ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "TE", dsi);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
> - gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
> + gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -1367,10 +1357,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi,
>
> static void exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - if (gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> - free_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
> - gpio_free(dsi->te_gpio);
> - dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
> + if (dsi->te_gpio) {
> + free_irq(gpiod_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio), dsi);
> + gpiod_put(dsi->te_gpio);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1745,9 +1734,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!dsi)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* To be checked as invalid one */
> - dsi->te_gpio = -ENOENT;
> -
> init_completion(&dsi->completed);
> spin_lock_init(&dsi->transfer_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->transfer_list);
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-09 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20211102022027epcas1p2316ca67e11a73b86f6261f7e221ef388@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-11-02 2:20 ` [PATCH] drm/exynos: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod interface Maíra Canal
2021-11-02 2:20 ` Maíra Canal
2021-11-02 2:20 ` Maíra Canal
2021-11-09 8:45 ` Inki Dae
2021-11-09 8:45 ` Inki Dae
2021-11-09 8:45 ` Inki Dae
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.