All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Lahav Schlesinger <lschlesinger@drivenets.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsahern@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, idosch@idosch.org,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, nikolay@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] rtnetlink: Support fine-grained netdevice bulk deletion
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 06:32:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66d3e40c-4889-9eed-e5af-8aed296498e5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104081053.33416-1-lschlesinger@drivenets.com>


On 1/4/22 00:10, Lahav Schlesinger wrote:
> Under large scale, some routers are required to support tens of thousands
> of devices at once, both physical and virtual (e.g. loopbacks, tunnels,
> vrfs, etc).
> At times such routers are required to delete massive amounts of devices
> at once, such as when a factory reset is performed on the router (causing
> a deletion of all devices), or when a configuration is restored after an
> upgrade, or as a request from an operator.
>
> Currently there are 2 means of deleting devices using Netlink:
> 1. Deleting a single device (either by ifindex using ifinfomsg::ifi_index,
> or by name using IFLA_IFNAME)
> 2. Delete all device that belong to a group (using IFLA_GROUP)
>
> Deletion of devices one-by-one has poor performance on large scale of
> devices compared to "group deletion":
> After all device are handled, netdev_run_todo() is called which
> calls rcu_barrier() to finish any outstanding RCU callbacks that were
> registered during the deletion of the device, then wait until the
> refcount of all the devices is 0, then perform final cleanups.
>
> However, calling rcu_barrier() is a very costly operation, each call
> taking in the order of 10s of milliseconds.
>
> When deleting a large number of device one-by-one, rcu_barrier()
> will be called for each device being deleted.
> As an example, following benchmark deletes 10K loopback devices,
> all of which are UP and with only IPv6 LLA being configured:
>
> 1. Deleting one-by-one using 1 thread : 243 seconds
> 2. Deleting one-by-one using 10 thread: 70 seconds
> 3. Deleting one-by-one using 50 thread: 54 seconds
> 4. Deleting all using "group deletion": 30 seconds
>
> Note that even though the deletion logic takes place under the rtnl
> lock, since the call to rcu_barrier() is outside the lock we gain
> some improvements.
>
> But, while "group deletion" is the fastest, it is not suited for
> deleting large number of arbitrary devices which are unknown a head of
> time. Furthermore, moving large number of devices to a group is also a
> costly operation.
>
> This patch adds support for passing an arbitrary list of ifindex of
> devices to delete with a new IFLA_IFINDEX attribute. A single message
> may contain multiple instances of this attribute).
> This gives a more fine-grained control over which devices to delete,
> while still resulting in rcu_barrier() being called only once.
> Indeed, the timings of using this new API to delete 10K devices is
> the same as using the existing "group" deletion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lahav Schlesinger <lschlesinger@drivenets.com>
> ---
> v5 -> v6
>   - Convert back to single IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST attribute instead of
>     IFLA_IFINDEX
>   - Added struct net_device::bulk_delete to avoid sorting ifindex list,
>     in order to call ->dellink() only once per potentially duplicated ifindex
>     (no increase in struct size)
>   - Make sure IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST cannot be used in
>     setlink()/newlink()/getlink()
>
> v4 -> v5
>   - Don't call ->dellink() multiple times if device is duplicated.
>
> v3 -> v4
>   - Change single IFLA_INDEX_LIST into multiple IFLA_IFINDEX
>   - Fail if passing both IFLA_GROUP and at least one IFLA_IFNEX
>
> v2 -> v3
>   - Rename 'ifindex_list' to 'ifindices', and pass it as int*
>   - Clamp 'ops' variable in second loop.
>
> v1 -> v2
>   - Unset 'len' of IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST in policy.
>   - Use __dev_get_by_index() instead of n^2 loop.
>   - Return -ENODEV if any ifindex is not present.
>   - Saved devices in an array.
>   - Fix formatting.
>
>   include/linux/netdevice.h    |  3 ++
>   include/uapi/linux/if_link.h |  1 +
>   net/core/rtnetlink.c         | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index df049864661d..c3cfbfaf7f06 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1926,6 +1926,8 @@ enum netdev_ml_priv_type {
>    *
>    *	@threaded:	napi threaded mode is enabled
>    *
> + *	@bulk_delete:	Device is marked for of bulk deletion
> + *
>    *	@net_notifier_list:	List of per-net netdev notifier block
>    *				that follow this device when it is moved
>    *				to another network namespace.
> @@ -2258,6 +2260,7 @@ struct net_device {
>   	bool			proto_down;
>   	unsigned		wol_enabled:1;
>   	unsigned		threaded:1;
> +	unsigned		bulk_delete:1;
>   
>   	struct list_head	net_notifier_list;
>   
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index eebd3894fe89..f950bf6ed025 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ enum {
>   	IFLA_PARENT_DEV_NAME,
>   	IFLA_PARENT_DEV_BUS_NAME,
>   
> +	IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST,
>   	__IFLA_MAX
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index fd030e02f16d..530371767565 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -1880,6 +1880,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = {
>   	[IFLA_PROTO_DOWN_REASON] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>   	[IFLA_NEW_IFINDEX]	= NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_S32, 1),
>   	[IFLA_PARENT_DEV_NAME]	= { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING },
> +	[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]     = { .type = NLA_BINARY },
>   };
>   
>   static const struct nla_policy ifla_info_policy[IFLA_INFO_MAX+1] = {
> @@ -3009,6 +3010,11 @@ static int rtnl_setlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>   		goto errout;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ifindex list attribute cannot be used in setlink");
> +		goto errout;
> +	}
> +
>   	err = do_setlink(skb, dev, ifm, extack, tb, ifname, 0);
>   errout:
>   	return err;
> @@ -3050,6 +3056,57 @@ static int rtnl_group_dellink(const struct net *net, int group)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int rtnl_list_dellink(struct net *net, int *ifindices, int size,
> +			     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const int num_devices = size / sizeof(int);
> +	struct net_device *dev;
> +	LIST_HEAD(list_kill);
> +	int i, j, ret;
> +
> +	if (size <= 0 || size % sizeof(int))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_devices; i++) {
> +		const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops;
> +
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindices[i]);


What happens if one device is present multiple times in ifindices[] ?

This should be an error.


> +		if (!dev) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unknown ifindex");
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		ops = dev->rtnl_link_ops;
> +		if (!ops || !ops->dellink) {
> +			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device cannot be deleted");
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev->bulk_delete = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_netdev(net, dev) {

This is going to be very expensive on hosts with 1 million netdev.

You should remove this dev->bulk_delete and instead use a list.

You already use @list_kill, you only need a second list and possibly 
reuse dev->unreg_list

If you do not feel confortable about reusing dev->unreg_list, add a new 
anchor (like dev->bulk_kill_list)

> +		if (dev->bulk_delete) {
> +			dev->rtnl_link_ops->dellink(dev, &list_kill);
> +			dev->bulk_delete = 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	unregister_netdevice_many(&list_kill);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
> +		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindices[j]);
> +		dev->bulk_delete = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   int rtnl_delete_link(struct net_device *dev)
>   {
>   	const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops;
> @@ -3093,6 +3150,11 @@ static int rtnl_dellink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>   			return PTR_ERR(tgt_net);
>   	}
>   
> +	if (tb[IFLA_GROUP] && tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Can't pass both IFLA_GROUP and IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
>   	err = -EINVAL;
>   	ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
>   	if (ifm->ifi_index > 0)
> @@ -3102,6 +3164,9 @@ static int rtnl_dellink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>   				   tb[IFLA_ALT_IFNAME], NULL);
>   	else if (tb[IFLA_GROUP])
>   		err = rtnl_group_dellink(tgt_net, nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_GROUP]));
> +	else if (tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST])
> +		err = rtnl_list_dellink(tgt_net, nla_data(tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]),
> +					nla_len(tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]), extack);
>   	else
>   		goto out;
>   
> @@ -3285,6 +3350,12 @@ static int __rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>   	else
>   		ifname[0] = '\0';
>   
> +	err = -EINVAL;
> +	if (tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ifindex list attribute cannot be used in newlink");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
>   	ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
>   	if (ifm->ifi_index > 0)
>   		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifi_index);
> @@ -3577,6 +3648,12 @@ static int rtnl_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>   	if (err < 0)
>   		return err;
>   
> +	err = -EINVAL;
> +	if (tb[IFLA_IFINDEX_LIST]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "ifindex list attribute cannot be used in getlink");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (tb[IFLA_TARGET_NETNSID]) {
>   		netnsid = nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_TARGET_NETNSID]);
>   		tgt_net = rtnl_get_net_ns_capable(NETLINK_CB(skb).sk, netnsid);

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04  8:10 [PATCH net-next v6] rtnetlink: Support fine-grained netdevice bulk deletion Lahav Schlesinger
2022-01-04 14:32 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2022-01-04 20:40   ` Lahav Schlesinger
2022-01-04 21:12     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-05  0:19       ` David Ahern
2022-01-06 19:51         ` Lahav Schlesinger
2022-01-05  0:18     ` David Ahern
2022-01-05 16:09       ` David Ahern
2022-01-06 19:54         ` Lahav Schlesinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66d3e40c-4889-9eed-e5af-8aed296498e5@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lschlesinger@drivenets.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.