From: "zhangxiaoxu (A)" <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com> To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, pmladek@suse.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] vgacon: Fix a UAF in vgacon_invert_region Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 14:30:14 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <67073029-8477-5f5a-ed2a-bb5ad4896878@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200303135940.GS13686@intel.com> 在 2020/3/3 21:59, Ville Syrjälä 写道: > That doesn't match how vc_screenbuf_size is computed elsewhere. Also > a lot of places seem to assume that the screenbuf can be larger than > vga_vram_size (eg. all the memcpy()s pick the smaller size of the > two). Yes, in the vga source code, we also pick the smaller size of two. But in other place, eg: vc_do_resize, copy the old_origin to new_origin, we not do that. It also make bad access happen. it maybe CVE-2020-8647. I think we should just assume the width/height maybe larger than the default, not the screenbuf larger than vga_vram_size. If not, any useful of the larger screenbuf? > > And you're changing the behaviour of the code when > 'width % 2 && user' is true
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "zhangxiaoxu (A)" <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com> To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, pmladek@suse.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] vgacon: Fix a UAF in vgacon_invert_region Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 22:30:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <67073029-8477-5f5a-ed2a-bb5ad4896878@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200303135940.GS13686@intel.com> 在 2020/3/3 21:59, Ville Syrjälä 写道: > That doesn't match how vc_screenbuf_size is computed elsewhere. Also > a lot of places seem to assume that the screenbuf can be larger than > vga_vram_size (eg. all the memcpy()s pick the smaller size of the > two). Yes, in the vga source code, we also pick the smaller size of two. But in other place, eg: vc_do_resize, copy the old_origin to new_origin, we not do that. It also make bad access happen. it maybe CVE-2020-8647. I think we should just assume the width/height maybe larger than the default, not the screenbuf larger than vga_vram_size. If not, any useful of the larger screenbuf? > > And you're changing the behaviour of the code when > 'width % 2 && user' is true _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-03 14:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-03-03 3:20 [PATCH] vgacon: Fix a UAF in vgacon_invert_region Zhang Xiaoxu 2020-03-03 3:20 ` Zhang Xiaoxu 2020-03-03 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-03-03 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-03-03 14:30 ` zhangxiaoxu (A) [this message] 2020-03-03 14:30 ` zhangxiaoxu (A) 2020-03-03 14:46 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-03-03 14:46 ` Ville Syrjälä 2020-03-04 1:31 ` zhangxiaoxu (A) 2020-03-04 1:31 ` zhangxiaoxu (A)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=67073029-8477-5f5a-ed2a-bb5ad4896878@huawei.com \ --to=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \ --cc=akpm@osdl.org \ --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pmladek@suse.com \ --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \ --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \ --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.