* [PATCH v2] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix compilation without CONFIG_SUSPEND
@ 2022-04-02 23:11 Mario Limonciello
2022-04-03 3:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-04-04 14:26 ` Hans de Goede
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2022-04-02 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede, Mark Gross, open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS
Cc: Shyam Sundar S K, Goswami Sanket, Mario Limonciello, Randy Dunlap
Since commit b1f66033cd4e ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the
suspend process") amd-pmc doesn't use traditional suspend resume
callback anymore but relies on functions only created declared when
CONFIG_SUSPEND is set.
Check for CONFIG_SUSPEND and only use those functions in those
circumstances.
Fixes: commit b1f66033cd4e ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the suspend process")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v1->v2:
* Fix warnings on unused stuff when no CONFIG_SUSPEND too.
drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
index e9d0dbbb2887..fa4123dbdf7f 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
@@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_stb, "Enable the STB debug mechanism");
static struct amd_pmc_dev pmc;
static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 arg, u32 *data, u8 msg, bool ret);
-static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data);
static int amd_pmc_read_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 *buf);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
+static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data);
+#endif
static inline u32 amd_pmc_reg_read(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, int reg_offset)
{
@@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ static int get_metrics_table(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev, struct smu_metrics *table
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
static void amd_pmc_validate_deepest(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev)
{
struct smu_metrics table;
@@ -338,6 +341,7 @@ static void amd_pmc_validate_deepest(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev)
dev_dbg(pdev->dev, "Last suspend in deepest state for %lluus\n",
table.timein_s0i3_lastcapture);
}
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
static int smu_fw_info_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
@@ -569,6 +573,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 arg, u32 *data, u8 msg,
return rc;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
static int amd_pmc_get_os_hint(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev)
{
switch (dev->cpu_id) {
@@ -694,6 +699,7 @@ static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops = {
.prepare = amd_pmc_s2idle_prepare,
.restore = amd_pmc_s2idle_restore,
};
+#endif
static const struct pci_device_id pmc_pci_ids[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, AMD_CPU_ID_YC) },
@@ -733,6 +739,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_s2d_init(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev)
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
{
int err;
@@ -753,6 +760,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
return 0;
}
+#endif
static int amd_pmc_read_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 *buf)
{
@@ -859,9 +867,11 @@ static int amd_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
amd_pmc_get_smu_version(dev);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
err = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops);
if (err)
dev_warn(dev->dev, "failed to register LPS0 sleep handler, expect increased power consumption\n");
+#endif
amd_pmc_dbgfs_register(dev);
return 0;
@@ -875,7 +885,9 @@ static int amd_pmc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct amd_pmc_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops);
+#endif
amd_pmc_dbgfs_unregister(dev);
pci_dev_put(dev->rdev);
mutex_destroy(&dev->lock);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix compilation without CONFIG_SUSPEND
2022-04-02 23:11 [PATCH v2] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix compilation without CONFIG_SUSPEND Mario Limonciello
@ 2022-04-03 3:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-04-04 14:26 ` Hans de Goede
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2022-04-03 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Limonciello, Hans de Goede, Mark Gross,
open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS
Cc: Shyam Sundar S K, Goswami Sanket
On 4/2/22 16:11, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Since commit b1f66033cd4e ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the
> suspend process") amd-pmc doesn't use traditional suspend resume
> callback anymore but relies on functions only created declared when
> CONFIG_SUSPEND is set.
>
> Check for CONFIG_SUSPEND and only use those functions in those
> circumstances.
>
> Fixes: commit b1f66033cd4e ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the suspend process")
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Thanks.
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * Fix warnings on unused stuff when no CONFIG_SUSPEND too.
>
> drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> index e9d0dbbb2887..fa4123dbdf7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> @@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_stb, "Enable the STB debug mechanism");
>
> static struct amd_pmc_dev pmc;
> static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 arg, u32 *data, u8 msg, bool ret);
> -static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data);
> static int amd_pmc_read_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 *buf);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> +static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data);
> +#endif
>
> static inline u32 amd_pmc_reg_read(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, int reg_offset)
> {
> @@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ static int get_metrics_table(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev, struct smu_metrics *table
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> static void amd_pmc_validate_deepest(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct smu_metrics table;
> @@ -338,6 +341,7 @@ static void amd_pmc_validate_deepest(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev)
> dev_dbg(pdev->dev, "Last suspend in deepest state for %lluus\n",
> table.timein_s0i3_lastcapture);
> }
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> static int smu_fw_info_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> @@ -569,6 +573,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 arg, u32 *data, u8 msg,
> return rc;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> static int amd_pmc_get_os_hint(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev)
> {
> switch (dev->cpu_id) {
> @@ -694,6 +699,7 @@ static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops = {
> .prepare = amd_pmc_s2idle_prepare,
> .restore = amd_pmc_s2idle_restore,
> };
> +#endif
>
> static const struct pci_device_id pmc_pci_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, AMD_CPU_ID_YC) },
> @@ -733,6 +739,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_s2d_init(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -753,6 +760,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static int amd_pmc_read_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 *buf)
> {
> @@ -859,9 +867,11 @@ static int amd_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> amd_pmc_get_smu_version(dev);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> err = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops);
> if (err)
> dev_warn(dev->dev, "failed to register LPS0 sleep handler, expect increased power consumption\n");
> +#endif
>
> amd_pmc_dbgfs_register(dev);
> return 0;
> @@ -875,7 +885,9 @@ static int amd_pmc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct amd_pmc_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops);
> +#endif
> amd_pmc_dbgfs_unregister(dev);
> pci_dev_put(dev->rdev);
> mutex_destroy(&dev->lock);
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix compilation without CONFIG_SUSPEND
2022-04-02 23:11 [PATCH v2] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix compilation without CONFIG_SUSPEND Mario Limonciello
2022-04-03 3:19 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2022-04-04 14:26 ` Hans de Goede
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2022-04-04 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mario Limonciello, Mark Gross, open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS
Cc: Shyam Sundar S K, Goswami Sanket, Randy Dunlap
Hi,
On 4/3/22 01:11, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Since commit b1f66033cd4e ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the
> suspend process") amd-pmc doesn't use traditional suspend resume
> callback anymore but relies on functions only created declared when
> CONFIG_SUSPEND is set.
>
> Check for CONFIG_SUSPEND and only use those functions in those
> circumstances.
>
> Fixes: commit b1f66033cd4e ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the suspend process")
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.
Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * Fix warnings on unused stuff when no CONFIG_SUSPEND too.
>
> drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> index e9d0dbbb2887..fa4123dbdf7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> @@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_stb, "Enable the STB debug mechanism");
>
> static struct amd_pmc_dev pmc;
> static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 arg, u32 *data, u8 msg, bool ret);
> -static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data);
> static int amd_pmc_read_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 *buf);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> +static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data);
> +#endif
>
> static inline u32 amd_pmc_reg_read(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, int reg_offset)
> {
> @@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ static int get_metrics_table(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev, struct smu_metrics *table
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> static void amd_pmc_validate_deepest(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct smu_metrics table;
> @@ -338,6 +341,7 @@ static void amd_pmc_validate_deepest(struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev)
> dev_dbg(pdev->dev, "Last suspend in deepest state for %lluus\n",
> table.timein_s0i3_lastcapture);
> }
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> static int smu_fw_info_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> @@ -569,6 +573,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 arg, u32 *data, u8 msg,
> return rc;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> static int amd_pmc_get_os_hint(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev)
> {
> switch (dev->cpu_id) {
> @@ -694,6 +699,7 @@ static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops = {
> .prepare = amd_pmc_s2idle_prepare,
> .restore = amd_pmc_s2idle_restore,
> };
> +#endif
>
> static const struct pci_device_id pmc_pci_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, AMD_CPU_ID_YC) },
> @@ -733,6 +739,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_s2d_init(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -753,6 +760,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_write_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 data)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static int amd_pmc_read_stb(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, u32 *buf)
> {
> @@ -859,9 +867,11 @@ static int amd_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> amd_pmc_get_smu_version(dev);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> err = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops);
> if (err)
> dev_warn(dev->dev, "failed to register LPS0 sleep handler, expect increased power consumption\n");
> +#endif
>
> amd_pmc_dbgfs_register(dev);
> return 0;
> @@ -875,7 +885,9 @@ static int amd_pmc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct amd_pmc_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&amd_pmc_s2idle_dev_ops);
> +#endif
> amd_pmc_dbgfs_unregister(dev);
> pci_dev_put(dev->rdev);
> mutex_destroy(&dev->lock);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-04 14:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-02 23:11 [PATCH v2] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix compilation without CONFIG_SUSPEND Mario Limonciello
2022-04-03 3:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-04-04 14:26 ` Hans de Goede
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.