* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-25 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2017-03-25 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi, timur, sulrich
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, Sinan Kaya, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Len Brown, linux-kernel
ACPI_IPMI driver currently depends on IPMI System Interface (IPMI_SI)
driver to be enabled. IPMI_SI driver only handles KCS, SMIC and BT BMC
interfaces.
IPMI_SSIF is an alternative BMC communication method. It allows BMC to
be accessed over an I2C bus instead of a standard interface.
Change the dependency to IPMI_HANDLER so that ACPI_IPMI works with all
IPMI providers.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 83e5f7e..3e15bf8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCESSOR
config ACPI_IPMI
tristate "IPMI"
- depends on IPMI_SI
+ depends on IPMI_HANDLER
default n
help
This driver enables the ACPI to access the BMC controller. And it
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-25 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2017-03-25 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
ACPI_IPMI driver currently depends on IPMI System Interface (IPMI_SI)
driver to be enabled. IPMI_SI driver only handles KCS, SMIC and BT BMC
interfaces.
IPMI_SSIF is an alternative BMC communication method. It allows BMC to
be accessed over an I2C bus instead of a standard interface.
Change the dependency to IPMI_HANDLER so that ACPI_IPMI works with all
IPMI providers.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 83e5f7e..3e15bf8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCESSOR
config ACPI_IPMI
tristate "IPMI"
- depends on IPMI_SI
+ depends on IPMI_HANDLER
default n
help
This driver enables the ACPI to access the BMC controller. And it
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
2017-03-25 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya
@ 2017-03-26 1:25 ` Corey Minyard
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-26 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sinan Kaya, linux-acpi, timur, sulrich
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
linux-kernel
On 03/25/2017 09:02 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> ACPI_IPMI driver currently depends on IPMI System Interface (IPMI_SI)
> driver to be enabled. IPMI_SI driver only handles KCS, SMIC and BT BMC
> interfaces.
>
> IPMI_SSIF is an alternative BMC communication method. It allows BMC to
> be accessed over an I2C bus instead of a standard interface.
>
> Change the dependency to IPMI_HANDLER so that ACPI_IPMI works with all
> IPMI providers.
If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Thanks,
-corey
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 83e5f7e..3e15bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCESSOR
>
> config ACPI_IPMI
> tristate "IPMI"
> - depends on IPMI_SI
> + depends on IPMI_HANDLER
> default n
> help
> This driver enables the ACPI to access the BMC controller. And it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-26 1:25 ` Corey Minyard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-26 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 03/25/2017 09:02 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> ACPI_IPMI driver currently depends on IPMI System Interface (IPMI_SI)
> driver to be enabled. IPMI_SI driver only handles KCS, SMIC and BT BMC
> interfaces.
>
> IPMI_SSIF is an alternative BMC communication method. It allows BMC to
> be accessed over an I2C bus instead of a standard interface.
>
> Change the dependency to IPMI_HANDLER so that ACPI_IPMI works with all
> IPMI providers.
If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Thanks,
-corey
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 83e5f7e..3e15bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCESSOR
>
> config ACPI_IPMI
> tristate "IPMI"
> - depends on IPMI_SI
> + depends on IPMI_HANDLER
> default n
> help
> This driver enables the ACPI to access the BMC controller. And it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
2017-03-26 1:25 ` Corey Minyard
@ 2017-03-27 14:21 ` Sinan Kaya
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2017-03-27 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: minyard, linux-acpi, timur, sulrich, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, Len Brown, linux-kernel
Rafael,
On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>
> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
What's your preference?
Sinan
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-27 14:21 ` Sinan Kaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2017-03-27 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Rafael,
On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>
> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
What's your preference?
Sinan
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
2017-03-27 14:21 ` Sinan Kaya
(?)
@ 2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-28 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sinan Kaya, linux-acpi, timur, sulrich, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Len Brown
On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>>
>> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> What's your preference?
I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
-corey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-28 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sinan Kaya, linux-acpi, timur, sulrich, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, Len Brown, linux-kernel
On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>>
>> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> What's your preference?
I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
-corey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-28 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>>
>> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> What's your preference?
I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
-corey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
(?)
@ 2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-03-28 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: minyard
Cc: sulrich, linux-arm-msm, timur, linux-kernel, Sinan Kaya,
linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, Len Brown
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 07:31:50 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Rafael,
> >
> > On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> > What's your preference?
>
> I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-03-28 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: minyard
Cc: Sinan Kaya, linux-acpi, timur, sulrich, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, Len Brown, linux-kernel
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 07:31:50 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Rafael,
> >
> > On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> > What's your preference?
>
> I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2017-03-28 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 07:31:50 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > Rafael,
> >
> > On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> > What's your preference?
>
> I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2017-03-28 15:41 ` Corey Minyard
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-28 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Sinan Kaya, linux-acpi, timur, sulrich, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, Len Brown, linux-kernel
On 03/28/2017 10:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 07:31:50 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
>> On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> Rafael,
>>>
>>> On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
>>> What's your preference?
>> I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
> OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
Thanks, queued and going to the linux-next tomorrow.
-corey
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-28 15:41 ` Corey Minyard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2017-03-28 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 03/28/2017 10:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 07:31:50 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
>> On 03/27/2017 09:21 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> Rafael,
>>>
>>> On 3/25/2017 9:25 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>> If the ACPI people ack this, I can queue it, or they can take it with:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
>>> What's your preference?
>> I can take it, it's all ready, I just need the ack.
> OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
Thanks, queued and going to the linux-next tomorrow.
-corey
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
2017-03-28 15:41 ` Corey Minyard
@ 2017-03-28 19:04 ` Sinan Kaya
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2017-03-28 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: minyard, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: linux-acpi, timur, sulrich, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel,
Len Brown, linux-kernel
On 3/28/2017 11:41 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
>
> Thanks, queued and going to the linux-next tomorrow.
thanks, does this include both of the ACPI/IPMI patches or just this one?
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF
@ 2017-03-28 19:04 ` Sinan Kaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2017-03-28 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 3/28/2017 11:41 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> OK, feel free to add an ACK from me then.
>
> Thanks, queued and going to the linux-next tomorrow.
thanks, does this include both of the ACPI/IPMI patches or just this one?
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-28 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-25 14:02 [PATCH V3] ACPI / IPMI: allow ACPI_IPMI with IPMI_SSIF Sinan Kaya
2017-03-25 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-26 1:25 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-26 1:25 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-27 14:21 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-27 14:21 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-28 12:31 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-28 15:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-28 15:41 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-28 15:41 ` Corey Minyard
2017-03-28 19:04 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 19:04 ` Sinan Kaya
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.