* [RESEND][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf_offline
@ 2021-10-08 0:46 quanyang.wang
2021-10-11 13:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: quanyang.wang @ 2021-10-08 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo, Zefan Li, Johannes Weiner, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Ming Lei, Jens Axboe
Cc: cgroups, linux-kernel, netdev, bpf, Quanyang Wang
From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
When enabling CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF, kmemleak can be observed by running
the command as below:
$mount -t cgroup -o none,name=foo cgroup cgroup/
$umount cgroup/
unreferenced object 0xc3585c40 (size 64):
comm "mount", pid 425, jiffies 4294959825 (age 31.990s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
01 00 00 80 84 8c 28 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ......(.........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6c 43 a0 c3 00 00 00 00 ........lC......
backtrace:
[<e95a2f9e>] cgroup_bpf_inherit+0x44/0x24c
[<1f03679c>] cgroup_setup_root+0x174/0x37c
[<ed4b0ac5>] cgroup1_get_tree+0x2c0/0x4a0
[<f85b12fd>] vfs_get_tree+0x24/0x108
[<f55aec5c>] path_mount+0x384/0x988
[<e2d5e9cd>] do_mount+0x64/0x9c
[<208c9cfe>] sys_mount+0xfc/0x1f4
[<06dd06e0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48
[<a8308cb3>] 0xbeb4daa8
This is because that root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data is allocated by the
function percpu_ref_init in cgroup_bpf_inherit which is called by
cgroup_setup_root when mounting, but not freed along with root_cgrp
when umounting. Adding cgroup_bpf_offline which calls percpu_ref_kill
to cgroup_kill_sb can free root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data in umount path.
Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcfb ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path")
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
---
One of the recipients' email is wrong, so I resend this patch.
Sorry for any confusion caused.
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index 570b0c97392a9..183736ad72f2b 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
@@ -2187,8 +2187,10 @@ static void cgroup_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
* And don't kill the default root.
*/
if (list_empty(&root->cgrp.self.children) && root != &cgrp_dfl_root &&
- !percpu_ref_is_dying(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt))
+ !percpu_ref_is_dying(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt)) {
+ cgroup_bpf_offline(&root->cgrp);
percpu_ref_kill(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt);
+ }
cgroup_put(&root->cgrp);
kernfs_kill_sb(sb);
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf_offline
2021-10-08 0:46 [RESEND][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf_offline quanyang.wang
@ 2021-10-11 13:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 5:44 ` Quanyang Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2021-10-11 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: quanyang.wang, Tejun Heo, Zefan Li, Johannes Weiner,
Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Ming Lei, Jens Axboe
Cc: cgroups, linux-kernel, netdev, bpf, Roman Gushchin
[ +Roman ]
On 10/8/21 2:46 AM, quanyang.wang@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
>
> When enabling CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF, kmemleak can be observed by running
> the command as below:
>
> $mount -t cgroup -o none,name=foo cgroup cgroup/
> $umount cgroup/
>
> unreferenced object 0xc3585c40 (size 64):
> comm "mount", pid 425, jiffies 4294959825 (age 31.990s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 01 00 00 80 84 8c 28 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ......(.........
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6c 43 a0 c3 00 00 00 00 ........lC......
> backtrace:
> [<e95a2f9e>] cgroup_bpf_inherit+0x44/0x24c
> [<1f03679c>] cgroup_setup_root+0x174/0x37c
> [<ed4b0ac5>] cgroup1_get_tree+0x2c0/0x4a0
> [<f85b12fd>] vfs_get_tree+0x24/0x108
> [<f55aec5c>] path_mount+0x384/0x988
> [<e2d5e9cd>] do_mount+0x64/0x9c
> [<208c9cfe>] sys_mount+0xfc/0x1f4
> [<06dd06e0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48
> [<a8308cb3>] 0xbeb4daa8
>
> This is because that root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data is allocated by the
> function percpu_ref_init in cgroup_bpf_inherit which is called by
> cgroup_setup_root when mounting, but not freed along with root_cgrp
> when umounting. Adding cgroup_bpf_offline which calls percpu_ref_kill
> to cgroup_kill_sb can free root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data in umount path.
>
> Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcfb ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path")
> Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
> ---
> One of the recipients' email is wrong, so I resend this patch.
> Sorry for any confusion caused.
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> index 570b0c97392a9..183736ad72f2b 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> @@ -2187,8 +2187,10 @@ static void cgroup_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> * And don't kill the default root.
> */
> if (list_empty(&root->cgrp.self.children) && root != &cgrp_dfl_root &&
> - !percpu_ref_is_dying(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt))
> + !percpu_ref_is_dying(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt)) {
> + cgroup_bpf_offline(&root->cgrp);
> percpu_ref_kill(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt);
> + }
> cgroup_put(&root->cgrp);
Doesn't cgroup_bpf_offline() internally bump the root cgroup's refcount via cgroup_get()?
How does this relate to the single cgroup_put() in the above line? Would have been nice to
see the commit msg elaborate more on this.
> kernfs_kill_sb(sb);
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf_offline
2021-10-11 13:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
@ 2021-10-12 5:44 ` Quanyang Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Quanyang Wang @ 2021-10-12 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Borkmann, Tejun Heo, Zefan Li, Johannes Weiner,
Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Ming Lei, Jens Axboe
Cc: cgroups, linux-kernel, netdev, bpf, Roman Gushchin
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your review.
On 10/11/21 9:44 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> [ +Roman ]
>
> On 10/8/21 2:46 AM, quanyang.wang@windriver.com wrote:
>> From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
>>
>> When enabling CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF, kmemleak can be observed by running
>> the command as below:
>>
>> $mount -t cgroup -o none,name=foo cgroup cgroup/
>> $umount cgroup/
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xc3585c40 (size 64):
>> comm "mount", pid 425, jiffies 4294959825 (age 31.990s)
>> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>> 01 00 00 80 84 8c 28 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ......(.........
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6c 43 a0 c3 00 00 00 00 ........lC......
>> backtrace:
>> [<e95a2f9e>] cgroup_bpf_inherit+0x44/0x24c
>> [<1f03679c>] cgroup_setup_root+0x174/0x37c
>> [<ed4b0ac5>] cgroup1_get_tree+0x2c0/0x4a0
>> [<f85b12fd>] vfs_get_tree+0x24/0x108
>> [<f55aec5c>] path_mount+0x384/0x988
>> [<e2d5e9cd>] do_mount+0x64/0x9c
>> [<208c9cfe>] sys_mount+0xfc/0x1f4
>> [<06dd06e0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48
>> [<a8308cb3>] 0xbeb4daa8
>>
>> This is because that root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data is allocated by the
>> function percpu_ref_init in cgroup_bpf_inherit which is called by
>> cgroup_setup_root when mounting, but not freed along with root_cgrp
>> when umounting. Adding cgroup_bpf_offline which calls percpu_ref_kill
>> to cgroup_kill_sb can free root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data in umount path.
>>
>> Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcfb ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of
>> percpu_ref in fast path")
>> Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> One of the recipients' email is wrong, so I resend this patch.
>> Sorry for any confusion caused.
>> ---
>> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
>> index 570b0c97392a9..183736ad72f2b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
>> @@ -2187,8 +2187,10 @@ static void cgroup_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>> * And don't kill the default root.
>> */
>> if (list_empty(&root->cgrp.self.children) && root !=
>> &cgrp_dfl_root &&
>> - !percpu_ref_is_dying(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt))
>> + !percpu_ref_is_dying(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt)) {
>> + cgroup_bpf_offline(&root->cgrp);
>> percpu_ref_kill(&root->cgrp.self.refcnt);
>> + }
>> cgroup_put(&root->cgrp);
>
> Doesn't cgroup_bpf_offline() internally bump the root cgroup's refcount
> via cgroup_get()?
> How does this relate to the single cgroup_put() in the above line?
There is cgroup_get/put pair inside cgroup_bpf_offline.
cgroup_get() is at the beginning of cgroup_bpf_offline.
cgroup_put is called at the routine:
cgroup_bpf_offline
->percpu_ref_kill
-->cgroup_bpf_release_fn
--->cgroup_bpf_release (there is a cgroup_put() at the end of it).
So cgroup_bpf_offline can keep the balance of cgroup's refcount.
Would
> have been nice to
> see the commit msg elaborate more on this.
>
OK, I will add description about this in the commit msg.
Thanks,
Quanyang
>
>> kernfs_kill_sb(sb);
>> }
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-12 5:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-08 0:46 [RESEND][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf_offline quanyang.wang
2021-10-11 13:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-10-12 5:44 ` Quanyang Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.