All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	afaerber@suse.de, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e031cba-1d59-ccf5-1b28-e37b610c6ae7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475108205-6043-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>



On 29/09/2016 02:16, David Gibson wrote:
> Alternatively, if we *don't* want to remove class properties, should
> we instead be trying to convert the many, many "instance" properties
> whose existence is actually per-class to be class properties?

Yes, this was the point of introducing them. :)

Paolo

> David Gibson (4):
>   qcrypto: Remove usage of class properties
>   s390: Don't use class properties
>   tests: Remove tests for class properties
>   qom: Abolish class properties
> 
>  crypto/secret.c            |  58 +++++++-------
>  crypto/tlscreds.c          |  44 +++++-----
>  crypto/tlscredsanon.c      |  16 ++--
>  crypto/tlscredsx509.c      |  26 +++---
>  include/qom/object.h       |  42 ----------
>  qom/object.c               | 195 ---------------------------------------------
>  target-s390x/cpu.c         |   1 -
>  target-s390x/cpu_models.c  |  47 +++++------
>  tests/check-qom-proplist.c |  30 +++----
>  9 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 353 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-29  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-29  0:16 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them? David Gibson
2016-09-29  0:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/4] qcrypto: Remove usage of class properties David Gibson
2016-09-29  0:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/4] s390: Don't use " David Gibson
2016-09-29  0:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 3/4] tests: Remove tests for " David Gibson
2016-09-29  0:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/4] qom: Abolish " David Gibson
2016-09-29  7:52 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-09-29  8:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them? Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-29 10:12   ` Andreas Färber
2016-09-29 10:21     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-29 10:23       ` Andreas Färber
2016-09-29 23:36         ` David Gibson
2016-10-04  9:51         ` Kevin Wolf
2016-09-29 23:33   ` David Gibson
2016-09-30  8:06     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-29 10:16 ` Andreas Färber
2016-09-29 23:37   ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e031cba-1d59-ccf5-1b28-e37b610c6ae7@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.