From: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: "Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Byron Marohn <byron.marohn@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
techboard@dpdk.org, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] efd: change data type of parameter
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:20:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f7d44a8-e847-6ad4-0ae6-daf0afc63d8f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xz_XQRNMDZZbX0MQ87-pU=29p3cdxcSpcH2eSw8W=6oQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/14/21 12:10 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:54 PM Pablo de Lara
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> rte_efd_create() function was using uint8_t for a socket bitmask,
>> for one of its parameters.
>> This limits the maximum of NUMA sockets to be 8.
>> Changing to to uint64_t increases it to 64, which should be
>> more future-proof.
>
> Cc: ppc maintainer, since I think powerX servers have non contiguous
> NUMA sockets.
Definitely correct, POWER CPU NUMA sockets are not necessarily contiguous.
Can you update efd_autotest and efd_perf_autotest as well? After
applying this patch the test still fails on my POWER9 system:
$ sudo /home/drc/src/dpdk/build/app/test/dpdk-test -l 64-127 -n 4 --no-pci
...
RTE>>efd_autotest
Entering test_add_delete
EFD: At least one CPU socket must be enabled in the bitmask
EAL: Test assert test_add_delete line 125 failed: Error creating the EFD
table
Test Failed
RTE>>
On this system lcores 64-127 reside on NUMA socket 8.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-14 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 16:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] efd: change data type of parameter Pablo de Lara
2021-09-13 18:18 ` Mcnamara, John
2021-09-14 7:10 ` David Marchand
2021-09-14 10:49 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-09-14 18:20 ` David Christensen [this message]
2021-09-17 12:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Pablo de Lara
2021-09-20 19:30 ` David Christensen
2021-09-28 14:18 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2021-09-28 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Pablo de Lara
2021-09-28 15:52 ` David Christensen
2021-09-29 7:51 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2021-09-29 17:41 ` David Christensen
2021-09-29 18:13 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-10-01 14:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f7d44a8-e847-6ad4-0ae6-daf0afc63d8f@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=byron.marohn@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.