* powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
@ 2011-05-17 16:28 Richard Cochran
2011-05-17 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Cochran @ 2011-05-17 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
Ben,
Recent 2.6.39-rc kernels behave strangely on the Freescale dual core
mpc8572 and p2020. There is a long pause (like 2 seconds) in the boot
sequence after "mpic: requesting IPIs..."
When the system comes up, only one core shows in /proc/cpuinfo. Later
on, lots of messages appear like the following:
INFO: task ksoftirqd/1:9 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
I bisected [1] the problem to:
commit c56e58537d504706954a06570b4034c04e5b7500
Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue Mar 8 14:40:04 2011 +1100
powerpc/smp: Create idle threads on demand and properly reset them
I don't see from that commit what had gone wrong. Perhaps you can
help resolve this?
Thanks,
Richard
1. I had to patch commit e5462d16 by hand when bisecting, which is a
fixup for commit fa3f82c8 and not yet merged in c56e5853.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-17 16:28 powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame Richard Cochran
@ 2011-05-17 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
2011-05-19 5:33 ` Kumar Gala
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2011-05-17 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Cochran, Kumar Gala; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:28 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Recent 2.6.39-rc kernels behave strangely on the Freescale dual core
> mpc8572 and p2020. There is a long pause (like 2 seconds) in the boot
> sequence after "mpic: requesting IPIs..."
>
> When the system comes up, only one core shows in /proc/cpuinfo. Later
> on, lots of messages appear like the following:
>
> INFO: task ksoftirqd/1:9 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>
> I bisected [1] the problem to:
>
> commit c56e58537d504706954a06570b4034c04e5b7500
> Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Date: Tue Mar 8 14:40:04 2011 +1100
>
> powerpc/smp: Create idle threads on demand and properly reset them
>
> I don't see from that commit what had gone wrong. Perhaps you can
> help resolve this?
Hrm, odd. Kumar, care to have a look ? That's what happens when you
don't get me HW to test with :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> 1. I had to patch commit e5462d16 by hand when bisecting, which is a
> fixup for commit fa3f82c8 and not yet merged in c56e5853.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-17 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
2011-05-19 5:33 ` Kumar Gala
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Cochran @ 2011-05-18 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Kumar Gala, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:40:16AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:28 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > Ben,
> >
> > Recent 2.6.39-rc kernels behave strangely on the Freescale dual core
> > mpc8572 and p2020. There is a long pause (like 2 seconds) in the boot
> > sequence after "mpic: requesting IPIs..."
> >
> > When the system comes up, only one core shows in /proc/cpuinfo. Later
> > on, lots of messages appear like the following:
> >
> > INFO: task ksoftirqd/1:9 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> >
> > I bisected [1] the problem to:
> >
> > commit c56e58537d504706954a06570b4034c04e5b7500
> > Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Date: Tue Mar 8 14:40:04 2011 +1100
> >
> > powerpc/smp: Create idle threads on demand and properly reset them
> >
> > I don't see from that commit what had gone wrong. Perhaps you can
> > help resolve this?
>
> Hrm, odd. Kumar, care to have a look ? That's what happens when you
> don't get me HW to test with :-)
(I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
the mpc85xx.)
Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
can I simply revert this one commit independently?
Thanks,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
@ 2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Cochran @ 2011-05-18 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:40:16AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:28 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > Ben,
> >
> > Recent 2.6.39-rc kernels behave strangely on the Freescale dual core
> > mpc8572 and p2020. There is a long pause (like 2 seconds) in the boot
> > sequence after "mpic: requesting IPIs..."
> >
> > When the system comes up, only one core shows in /proc/cpuinfo. Later
> > on, lots of messages appear like the following:
> >
> > INFO: task ksoftirqd/1:9 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> >
> > I bisected [1] the problem to:
> >
> > commit c56e58537d504706954a06570b4034c04e5b7500
> > Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Date: Tue Mar 8 14:40:04 2011 +1100
> >
> > powerpc/smp: Create idle threads on demand and properly reset them
> >
> > I don't see from that commit what had gone wrong. Perhaps you can
> > help resolve this?
>
> Hrm, odd. Kumar, care to have a look ? That's what happens when you
> don't get me HW to test with :-)
(I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
the mpc85xx.)
Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
can I simply revert this one commit independently?
Thanks,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
(?)
@ 2011-05-18 17:19 ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Milton Miller @ 2011-05-18 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Cochran; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
Does this patch help? If so please reply to that thread so patchwork
will see it in addition to here.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/96146/
milton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-18 17:19 ` Milton Miller
@ 2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2011-05-18 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Milton Miller
Cc: Richard Cochran, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Kumar Gala, Kerstin Jonsson
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:19 -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> Does this patch help? If so please reply to that thread so patchwork
> will see it in addition to here.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/96146/
Interesting. I'll have a closer look today. Unfortunately, I don't have
any 32-bit BookE SMP at hand at the moment so I couldn't test those
configs.
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
@ 2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2011-05-18 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Milton Miller
Cc: Kerstin Jonsson, Richard Cochran, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:19 -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> Does this patch help? If so please reply to that thread so patchwork
> will see it in addition to here.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/96146/
Interesting. I'll have a closer look today. Unfortunately, I don't have
any 32-bit BookE SMP at hand at the moment so I couldn't test those
configs.
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
@ 2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2011-05-18 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Cochran; +Cc: Kumar Gala, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
> (I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
> the mpc85xx.)
>
> Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
> can I simply revert this one commit independently?
For your own use sure :-) But I'd still like to get to the bottom of
this !
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
@ 2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2011-05-18 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Cochran; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
> (I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
> the mpc85xx.)
>
> Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
> can I simply revert this one commit independently?
For your own use sure :-) But I'd still like to get to the bottom of
this !
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2011-05-19 5:32 ` Kumar Gala
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-05-19 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Richard Cochran, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On May 18, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> (I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
>> the mpc85xx.)
>>
>> Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
>> can I simply revert this one commit independently?
>
> For your own use sure :-) But I'd still like to get to the bottom of
> this !
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Tested the 'merge' branch and it appears to fix the issues with secondary cores coming up.
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
@ 2011-05-19 5:32 ` Kumar Gala
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-05-19 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Richard Cochran, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On May 18, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>=20
>> (I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
>> the mpc85xx.)
>>=20
>> Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
>> can I simply revert this one commit independently?
>=20
> For your own use sure :-) But I'd still like to get to the bottom of
> this !
>=20
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Tested the 'merge' branch and it appears to fix the issues with =
secondary cores coming up.
- k=
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame
2011-05-17 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
@ 2011-05-19 5:33 ` Kumar Gala
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2011-05-19 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: Richard Cochran, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On May 17, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:28 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> Recent 2.6.39-rc kernels behave strangely on the Freescale dual core
>> mpc8572 and p2020. There is a long pause (like 2 seconds) in the boot
>> sequence after "mpic: requesting IPIs..."
>>
>> When the system comes up, only one core shows in /proc/cpuinfo. Later
>> on, lots of messages appear like the following:
>>
>> INFO: task ksoftirqd/1:9 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>>
>> I bisected [1] the problem to:
>>
>> commit c56e58537d504706954a06570b4034c04e5b7500
>> Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Date: Tue Mar 8 14:40:04 2011 +1100
>>
>> powerpc/smp: Create idle threads on demand and properly reset them
>>
>> I don't see from that commit what had gone wrong. Perhaps you can
>> help resolve this?
>
> Hrm, odd. Kumar, care to have a look ? That's what happens when you
> don't get me HW to test with :-)
I'm trying to work on it ;)
- k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-19 5:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-17 16:28 powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame Richard Cochran
2011-05-17 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
2011-05-18 12:03 ` Richard Cochran
2011-05-18 17:19 ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 21:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 5:32 ` Kumar Gala
2011-05-19 5:32 ` Kumar Gala
2011-05-19 5:33 ` Kumar Gala
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.