All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	"Andreas Dilger" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:15:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7207F5AF-1798-4C53-8EBF-6A8316004D1C@cray.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151847927929.19840.14894766883488647956.stgit@noble>

With the fix from yesterday, these look good.  Thanks, Neil.

Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>

- Patrick

On 2/12/18, 5:52 PM, "lustre-devel on behalf of NeilBrown" <lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org on behalf of neilb@suse.com> wrote:

    These macros are no longer used, so they can
    be removed.
    
    Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
    ---
     drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h |  249 --------------------
     1 file changed, 249 deletions(-)
    
    diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
    index ccc1a329e42b..1efd86f18c1f 100644
    --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
    +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
    @@ -76,123 +76,6 @@ int do_set_info_async(struct obd_import *imp,
     
     void target_send_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req, int rc, int fail_id);
     
    -/*
    - * l_wait_event is a flexible sleeping function, permitting simple caller
    - * configuration of interrupt and timeout sensitivity along with actions to
    - * be performed in the event of either exception.
    - *
    - * The first form of usage looks like this:
    - *
    - * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(timeout, timeout_handler,
    - *					   intr_handler, callback_data);
    - * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
    - *
    - * l_wait_event() makes the current process wait on 'waitq' until 'condition'
    - * is TRUE or a "killable" signal (SIGTERM, SIKGILL, SIGINT) is pending.  It
    - * returns 0 to signify 'condition' is TRUE, but if a signal wakes it before
    - * 'condition' becomes true, it optionally calls the specified 'intr_handler'
    - * if not NULL, and returns -EINTR.
    - *
    - * If a non-zero timeout is specified, signals are ignored until the timeout
    - * has expired.  At this time, if 'timeout_handler' is not NULL it is called.
    - * If it returns FALSE l_wait_event() continues to wait as described above with
    - * signals enabled.  Otherwise it returns -ETIMEDOUT.
    - *
    - * LWI_INTR(intr_handler, callback_data) is shorthand for
    - * LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(0, NULL, intr_handler, callback_data)
    - *
    - * The second form of usage looks like this:
    - *
    - * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT(timeout, timeout_handler);
    - * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
    - *
    - * This form is the same as the first except that it COMPLETELY IGNORES
    - * SIGNALS.  The caller must therefore beware that if 'timeout' is zero, or if
    - * 'timeout_handler' is not NULL and returns FALSE, then the ONLY thing that
    - * can unblock the current process is 'condition' becoming TRUE.
    - *
    - * Another form of usage is:
    - * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(timeout, interval,
    - *					       timeout_handler);
    - * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
    - * This is the same as previous case, but condition is checked once every
    - * 'interval' jiffies (if non-zero).
    - *
    - * Subtle synchronization point: this macro does *not* necessary takes
    - * wait-queue spin-lock before returning, and, hence, following idiom is safe
    - * ONLY when caller provides some external locking:
    - *
    - *	     Thread1			    Thread2
    - *
    - *   l_wait_event(&obj->wq, ....);				       (1)
    - *
    - *				    wake_up(&obj->wq):		 (2)
    - *					 spin_lock(&q->lock);	  (2.1)
    - *					 __wake_up_common(q, ...);     (2.2)
    - *					 spin_unlock(&q->lock, flags); (2.3)
    - *
    - *   kfree(obj);						  (3)
    - *
    - * As l_wait_event() may "short-cut" execution and return without taking
    - * wait-queue spin-lock, some additional synchronization is necessary to
    - * guarantee that step (3) can begin only after (2.3) finishes.
    - *
    - * XXX nikita: some ptlrpc daemon threads have races of that sort.
    - *
    - */
    -
    -#define LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP ((void (*)(void *))(-1))
    -
    -struct l_wait_info {
    -	long lwi_timeout;
    -	long lwi_interval;
    -	int	    lwi_allow_intr;
    -	int  (*lwi_on_timeout)(void *);
    -	void (*lwi_on_signal)(void *);
    -	void  *lwi_cb_data;
    -};
    -
    -/* NB: LWI_TIMEOUT ignores signals completely */
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT(time, cb, data)	     \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {			 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,		 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = cb,		   \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,		 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = 0,		    \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 0		     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(time, interval, cb, data)  \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {				 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,			 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = cb,			   \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,			 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = interval,		     \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 0			     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(time, time_cb, sig_cb, data)   \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {				 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,			 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = time_cb,		      \
    -	.lwi_on_signal  = sig_cb,		       \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,			 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = 0,			    \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 0			     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR_ALL(time, time_cb, sig_cb, data)       \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {					 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,				 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = time_cb,			      \
    -	.lwi_on_signal  = sig_cb,			       \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,				 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = 0,				    \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 1				     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_INTR(cb, data)  LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(0, NULL, cb, data)
    -
     #define LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS (sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGINT) |		\
     			   sigmask(SIGTERM) | sigmask(SIGQUIT) |	\
     			   sigmask(SIGALRM))
    @@ -201,138 +84,6 @@ static inline int l_fatal_signal_pending(struct task_struct *p)
     	return signal_pending(p) && sigtestsetmask(&p->pending.signal, LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);
     }
     
    -/**
    - * wait_queue_entry_t of Linux (version < 2.6.34) is a FIFO list for exclusively
    - * waiting threads, which is not always desirable because all threads will
    - * be waken up again and again, even user only needs a few of them to be
    - * active most time. This is not good for performance because cache can
    - * be polluted by different threads.
    - *
    - * LIFO list can resolve this problem because we always wakeup the most
    - * recent active thread by default.
    - *
    - * NB: please don't call non-exclusive & exclusive wait on the same
    - * waitq if add_wait_queue_exclusive_head is used.
    - */
    -#define add_wait_queue_exclusive_head(waitq, link)		\
    -{								\
    -	unsigned long flags;					\
    -								\
    -	spin_lock_irqsave(&((waitq)->lock), flags);		\
    -	__add_wait_queue_exclusive(waitq, link);		\
    -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&((waitq)->lock), flags);	\
    -}
    -
    -/*
    - * wait for @condition to become true, but no longer than timeout, specified
    - * by @info.
    - */
    -#define __l_wait_event(wq, condition, info, ret, l_add_wait)		   \
    -do {									   \
    -	wait_queue_entry_t __wait;						 \
    -	long __timeout = info->lwi_timeout;			  \
    -	sigset_t   __blocked;					      \
    -	int   __allow_intr = info->lwi_allow_intr;			     \
    -									       \
    -	ret = 0;							       \
    -	if (condition)							 \
    -		break;							 \
    -									       \
    -	init_waitqueue_entry(&__wait, current);					    \
    -	l_add_wait(&wq, &__wait);					      \
    -									       \
    -	/* Block all signals (just the non-fatal ones if no timeout). */       \
    -	if (info->lwi_on_signal && (__timeout == 0 || __allow_intr))   \
    -		__blocked = cfs_block_sigsinv(LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);	      \
    -	else								   \
    -		__blocked = cfs_block_sigsinv(0);			      \
    -									       \
    -	for (;;) {							     \
    -		if (condition)						 \
    -			break;						 \
    -									       \
    -		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);			       \
    -									       \
    -		if (__timeout == 0) {					  \
    -			schedule();					       \
    -		} else {						       \
    -			long interval = info->lwi_interval ?	  \
    -					     min_t(long,	     \
    -						 info->lwi_interval, __timeout) : \
    -					     __timeout;			\
    -			long remaining = schedule_timeout(interval);\
    -			__timeout = cfs_time_sub(__timeout,		    \
    -					    cfs_time_sub(interval, remaining));\
    -			if (__timeout == 0) {				  \
    -				if (!info->lwi_on_timeout ||		      \
    -				    info->lwi_on_timeout(info->lwi_cb_data)) { \
    -					ret = -ETIMEDOUT;		      \
    -					break;				 \
    -				}					      \
    -				/* Take signals after the timeout expires. */  \
    -				if (info->lwi_on_signal)		       \
    -				    (void)cfs_block_sigsinv(LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);\
    -			}						      \
    -		}							      \
    -									       \
    -		set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);			       \
    -									       \
    -		if (condition)						 \
    -			break;						 \
    -		if (signal_pending(current)) {				    \
    -			if (info->lwi_on_signal &&		     \
    -			    (__timeout == 0 || __allow_intr)) {		\
    -				if (info->lwi_on_signal != LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP) \
    -					info->lwi_on_signal(info->lwi_cb_data);\
    -				ret = -EINTR;				  \
    -				break;					 \
    -			}						      \
    -			/* We have to do this here because some signals */     \
    -			/* are not blockable - ie from strace(1).       */     \
    -			/* In these cases we want to schedule_timeout() */     \
    -			/* again, because we don't want that to return  */     \
    -			/* -EINTR when the RPC actually succeeded.      */     \
    -			/* the recalc_sigpending() below will deliver the */     \
    -			/* signal properly.			     */     \
    -			cfs_clear_sigpending();				\
    -		}							      \
    -	}								      \
    -									       \
    -	cfs_restore_sigs(__blocked);					   \
    -									       \
    -	remove_wait_queue(&wq, &__wait);					   \
    -} while (0)
    -
    -#define l_wait_event(wq, condition, info)		       \
    -({							      \
    -	int		 __ret;			      \
    -	struct l_wait_info *__info = (info);		    \
    -								\
    -	__l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info,		   \
    -		       __ret, add_wait_queue);		   \
    -	__ret;						  \
    -})
    -
    -#define l_wait_event_exclusive(wq, condition, info)	     \
    -({							      \
    -	int		 __ret;			      \
    -	struct l_wait_info *__info = (info);		    \
    -								\
    -	__l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info,		   \
    -		       __ret, add_wait_queue_exclusive);	 \
    -	__ret;						  \
    -})
    -
    -#define l_wait_event_exclusive_head(wq, condition, info)	\
    -({							      \
    -	int		 __ret;			      \
    -	struct l_wait_info *__info = (info);		    \
    -								\
    -	__l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info,		   \
    -		       __ret, add_wait_queue_exclusive_head);    \
    -	__ret;						  \
    -})
    -
     /** @} lib */
     
     
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    lustre-devel mailing list
    lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
    


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:15:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7207F5AF-1798-4C53-8EBF-6A8316004D1C@cray.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151847927929.19840.14894766883488647956.stgit@noble>

With the fix from yesterday, these look good.  Thanks, Neil.

Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>

- Patrick

?On 2/12/18, 5:52 PM, "lustre-devel on behalf of NeilBrown" <lustre-devel-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of neilb@suse.com> wrote:

    These macros are no longer used, so they can
    be removed.
    
    Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
    ---
     drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h |  249 --------------------
     1 file changed, 249 deletions(-)
    
    diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
    index ccc1a329e42b..1efd86f18c1f 100644
    --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
    +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
    @@ -76,123 +76,6 @@ int do_set_info_async(struct obd_import *imp,
     
     void target_send_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req, int rc, int fail_id);
     
    -/*
    - * l_wait_event is a flexible sleeping function, permitting simple caller
    - * configuration of interrupt and timeout sensitivity along with actions to
    - * be performed in the event of either exception.
    - *
    - * The first form of usage looks like this:
    - *
    - * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(timeout, timeout_handler,
    - *					   intr_handler, callback_data);
    - * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
    - *
    - * l_wait_event() makes the current process wait on 'waitq' until 'condition'
    - * is TRUE or a "killable" signal (SIGTERM, SIKGILL, SIGINT) is pending.  It
    - * returns 0 to signify 'condition' is TRUE, but if a signal wakes it before
    - * 'condition' becomes true, it optionally calls the specified 'intr_handler'
    - * if not NULL, and returns -EINTR.
    - *
    - * If a non-zero timeout is specified, signals are ignored until the timeout
    - * has expired.  At this time, if 'timeout_handler' is not NULL it is called.
    - * If it returns FALSE l_wait_event() continues to wait as described above with
    - * signals enabled.  Otherwise it returns -ETIMEDOUT.
    - *
    - * LWI_INTR(intr_handler, callback_data) is shorthand for
    - * LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(0, NULL, intr_handler, callback_data)
    - *
    - * The second form of usage looks like this:
    - *
    - * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT(timeout, timeout_handler);
    - * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
    - *
    - * This form is the same as the first except that it COMPLETELY IGNORES
    - * SIGNALS.  The caller must therefore beware that if 'timeout' is zero, or if
    - * 'timeout_handler' is not NULL and returns FALSE, then the ONLY thing that
    - * can unblock the current process is 'condition' becoming TRUE.
    - *
    - * Another form of usage is:
    - * struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(timeout, interval,
    - *					       timeout_handler);
    - * rc = l_wait_event(waitq, condition, &lwi);
    - * This is the same as previous case, but condition is checked once every
    - * 'interval' jiffies (if non-zero).
    - *
    - * Subtle synchronization point: this macro does *not* necessary takes
    - * wait-queue spin-lock before returning, and, hence, following idiom is safe
    - * ONLY when caller provides some external locking:
    - *
    - *	     Thread1			    Thread2
    - *
    - *   l_wait_event(&obj->wq, ....);				       (1)
    - *
    - *				    wake_up(&obj->wq):		 (2)
    - *					 spin_lock(&q->lock);	  (2.1)
    - *					 __wake_up_common(q, ...);     (2.2)
    - *					 spin_unlock(&q->lock, flags); (2.3)
    - *
    - *   kfree(obj);						  (3)
    - *
    - * As l_wait_event() may "short-cut" execution and return without taking
    - * wait-queue spin-lock, some additional synchronization is necessary to
    - * guarantee that step (3) can begin only after (2.3) finishes.
    - *
    - * XXX nikita: some ptlrpc daemon threads have races of that sort.
    - *
    - */
    -
    -#define LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP ((void (*)(void *))(-1))
    -
    -struct l_wait_info {
    -	long lwi_timeout;
    -	long lwi_interval;
    -	int	    lwi_allow_intr;
    -	int  (*lwi_on_timeout)(void *);
    -	void (*lwi_on_signal)(void *);
    -	void  *lwi_cb_data;
    -};
    -
    -/* NB: LWI_TIMEOUT ignores signals completely */
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT(time, cb, data)	     \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {			 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,		 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = cb,		   \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,		 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = 0,		    \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 0		     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(time, interval, cb, data)  \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {				 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,			 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = cb,			   \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,			 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = interval,		     \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 0			     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(time, time_cb, sig_cb, data)   \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {				 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,			 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = time_cb,		      \
    -	.lwi_on_signal  = sig_cb,		       \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,			 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = 0,			    \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 0			     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR_ALL(time, time_cb, sig_cb, data)       \
    -((struct l_wait_info) {					 \
    -	.lwi_timeout    = time,				 \
    -	.lwi_on_timeout = time_cb,			      \
    -	.lwi_on_signal  = sig_cb,			       \
    -	.lwi_cb_data    = data,				 \
    -	.lwi_interval   = 0,				    \
    -	.lwi_allow_intr = 1				     \
    -})
    -
    -#define LWI_INTR(cb, data)  LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(0, NULL, cb, data)
    -
     #define LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS (sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGINT) |		\
     			   sigmask(SIGTERM) | sigmask(SIGQUIT) |	\
     			   sigmask(SIGALRM))
    @@ -201,138 +84,6 @@ static inline int l_fatal_signal_pending(struct task_struct *p)
     	return signal_pending(p) && sigtestsetmask(&p->pending.signal, LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);
     }
     
    -/**
    - * wait_queue_entry_t of Linux (version < 2.6.34) is a FIFO list for exclusively
    - * waiting threads, which is not always desirable because all threads will
    - * be waken up again and again, even user only needs a few of them to be
    - * active most time. This is not good for performance because cache can
    - * be polluted by different threads.
    - *
    - * LIFO list can resolve this problem because we always wakeup the most
    - * recent active thread by default.
    - *
    - * NB: please don't call non-exclusive & exclusive wait on the same
    - * waitq if add_wait_queue_exclusive_head is used.
    - */
    -#define add_wait_queue_exclusive_head(waitq, link)		\
    -{								\
    -	unsigned long flags;					\
    -								\
    -	spin_lock_irqsave(&((waitq)->lock), flags);		\
    -	__add_wait_queue_exclusive(waitq, link);		\
    -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&((waitq)->lock), flags);	\
    -}
    -
    -/*
    - * wait for @condition to become true, but no longer than timeout, specified
    - * by @info.
    - */
    -#define __l_wait_event(wq, condition, info, ret, l_add_wait)		   \
    -do {									   \
    -	wait_queue_entry_t __wait;						 \
    -	long __timeout = info->lwi_timeout;			  \
    -	sigset_t   __blocked;					      \
    -	int   __allow_intr = info->lwi_allow_intr;			     \
    -									       \
    -	ret = 0;							       \
    -	if (condition)							 \
    -		break;							 \
    -									       \
    -	init_waitqueue_entry(&__wait, current);					    \
    -	l_add_wait(&wq, &__wait);					      \
    -									       \
    -	/* Block all signals (just the non-fatal ones if no timeout). */       \
    -	if (info->lwi_on_signal && (__timeout == 0 || __allow_intr))   \
    -		__blocked = cfs_block_sigsinv(LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);	      \
    -	else								   \
    -		__blocked = cfs_block_sigsinv(0);			      \
    -									       \
    -	for (;;) {							     \
    -		if (condition)						 \
    -			break;						 \
    -									       \
    -		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);			       \
    -									       \
    -		if (__timeout == 0) {					  \
    -			schedule();					       \
    -		} else {						       \
    -			long interval = info->lwi_interval ?	  \
    -					     min_t(long,	     \
    -						 info->lwi_interval, __timeout) : \
    -					     __timeout;			\
    -			long remaining = schedule_timeout(interval);\
    -			__timeout = cfs_time_sub(__timeout,		    \
    -					    cfs_time_sub(interval, remaining));\
    -			if (__timeout == 0) {				  \
    -				if (!info->lwi_on_timeout ||		      \
    -				    info->lwi_on_timeout(info->lwi_cb_data)) { \
    -					ret = -ETIMEDOUT;		      \
    -					break;				 \
    -				}					      \
    -				/* Take signals after the timeout expires. */  \
    -				if (info->lwi_on_signal)		       \
    -				    (void)cfs_block_sigsinv(LUSTRE_FATAL_SIGS);\
    -			}						      \
    -		}							      \
    -									       \
    -		set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);			       \
    -									       \
    -		if (condition)						 \
    -			break;						 \
    -		if (signal_pending(current)) {				    \
    -			if (info->lwi_on_signal &&		     \
    -			    (__timeout == 0 || __allow_intr)) {		\
    -				if (info->lwi_on_signal != LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP) \
    -					info->lwi_on_signal(info->lwi_cb_data);\
    -				ret = -EINTR;				  \
    -				break;					 \
    -			}						      \
    -			/* We have to do this here because some signals */     \
    -			/* are not blockable - ie from strace(1).       */     \
    -			/* In these cases we want to schedule_timeout() */     \
    -			/* again, because we don't want that to return  */     \
    -			/* -EINTR when the RPC actually succeeded.      */     \
    -			/* the recalc_sigpending() below will deliver the */     \
    -			/* signal properly.			     */     \
    -			cfs_clear_sigpending();				\
    -		}							      \
    -	}								      \
    -									       \
    -	cfs_restore_sigs(__blocked);					   \
    -									       \
    -	remove_wait_queue(&wq, &__wait);					   \
    -} while (0)
    -
    -#define l_wait_event(wq, condition, info)		       \
    -({							      \
    -	int		 __ret;			      \
    -	struct l_wait_info *__info = (info);		    \
    -								\
    -	__l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info,		   \
    -		       __ret, add_wait_queue);		   \
    -	__ret;						  \
    -})
    -
    -#define l_wait_event_exclusive(wq, condition, info)	     \
    -({							      \
    -	int		 __ret;			      \
    -	struct l_wait_info *__info = (info);		    \
    -								\
    -	__l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info,		   \
    -		       __ret, add_wait_queue_exclusive);	 \
    -	__ret;						  \
    -})
    -
    -#define l_wait_event_exclusive_head(wq, condition, info)	\
    -({							      \
    -	int		 __ret;			      \
    -	struct l_wait_info *__info = (info);		    \
    -								\
    -	__l_wait_event(wq, condition, __info,		   \
    -		       __ret, add_wait_queue_exclusive_head);    \
    -	__ret;						  \
    -})
    -
     /** @} lib */
     
     
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    lustre-devel mailing list
    lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
    

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-13 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 21:22 [PATCH 00/19] RESEND staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 05/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout() where appropriate NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 04/19] staging: lustre: discard cfs_time_seconds() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 08/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 22:08   ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 22:08     ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13  0:17     ` NeilBrown
2018-02-13  0:17       ` NeilBrown
2018-02-13  0:46       ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13  0:46         ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-13 20:17   ` [PATCH 08/19 - v2] " NeilBrown
2018-02-13 20:17     ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-16 14:18     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-02-16 14:18       ` [lustre-devel] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 06/19] staging: lustre: introduce and use l_wait_event_abortable() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:36   ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 21:36     ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 23:58     ` NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:58       ` NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 03/19] staging: lustre: replace simple cases of l_wait_event() with wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 02/19] staging: lustre: discard SVC_SIGNAL and related functions NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 07/19] staging: lustre: simplify l_wait_event when intr handler but no timeout NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/wait: add wait_event_idle() functions NeilBrown
2018-02-12 21:22   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 13/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout in ptlrpcd() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 10/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ptlrpc_invalidate_import() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-13 18:15   ` Patrick Farrell [this message]
2018-02-13 18:15     ` Patrick Farrell
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 16/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 17/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event from ptlrpc_set_wait NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 18/19] staging: lustre: replace l_wait_event_exclusive_head() with wait_event_idle_exclusive NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 12/19] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 15/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47   ` [lustre-devel] " NeilBrown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-08  3:28 [PATCH 5 v2: 00/19] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-01-08  3:28 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36   ` James Simmons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7207F5AF-1798-4C53-8EBF-6A8316004D1C@cray.com \
    --to=paf@cray.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.