* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-03 17:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-06-03 23:00 ` Justin Forbes
2022-06-04 6:25 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2022-06-03 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-03 17:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-03 23:00 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2022-06-04 6:25 ` Ron Economos
2022-06-04 16:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2022-06-04 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 6/3/22 10:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-03 17:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-03 23:00 ` Justin Forbes
2022-06-04 6:25 ` Ron Economos
@ 2022-06-04 16:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-04 18:56 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-06-04 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 23:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.18.2-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.18.y
* git commit: 20fa00749a26c2347ca02a2eb231d61ecd877c90
* git describe: v5.18-116-g20fa00749a26
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18-116-g20fa00749a26
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18-48-g10e6e3d47333)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18-48-g10e6e3d47333)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18-48-g10e6e3d47333)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18-48-g10e6e3d47333)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 132732, pass: 121296, fail: 1353, skip: 10083, xfail: 0
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 313 total, 313 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kunit/15
* kunit/261
* kunit/3
* kunit/427
* kunit/90
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-03 17:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-04 16:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-06-04 18:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-05 2:28 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-06-05 7:02 ` Bagas Sanjaya
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-06-04 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 152 pass: 152 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-03 17:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-04 18:56 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-06-05 2:28 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-06-05 7:02 ` Bagas Sanjaya
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rudi Heitbaum @ 2022-06-05 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Jun 2022 17:38:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.18.2-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-03 17:43 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-05 2:28 ` Rudi Heitbaum
@ 2022-06-05 7:02 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-05 7:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2022-06-05 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade, Ferenc Havasi, Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Successfully cross-compiled for arm (multi_v7_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0, neon
FPU) and arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
On arm64 build, I found partly outside array bounds warning:
CC [M] fs/jffs2/summary.o
LD [M] drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cma_helper.o
LD [M] drivers/gpu/drm/drm_shmem_helper.o
LD [M] drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper.o
LD [M] drivers/gpu/drm/drm.o
AR drivers/gpu/drm/built-in.a
AR drivers/gpu/vga/built-in.a
AR drivers/gpu/built-in.a
CC drivers/base/power/sysfs.o
In file included from fs/jffs2/summary.c:23:
In function 'jffs2_sum_add_mem',
inlined from 'jffs2_sum_add_inode_mem' at fs/jffs2/summary.c:130:9:
fs/jffs2/nodelist.h:43:28: warning: array subscript 'union jffs2_sum_mem[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'unsigned char[26]' [-Warray-bounds]
43 | #define je16_to_cpu(x) ((x).v16)
| ~~~~^~~~~
fs/jffs2/summary.c:71:17: note: in expansion of macro 'je16_to_cpu'
71 | switch (je16_to_cpu(item->u.nodetype)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from fs/jffs2/summary.c:17:
In function 'kmalloc',
inlined from 'jffs2_sum_add_inode_mem' at fs/jffs2/summary.c:118:37:
./include/linux/slab.h:581:24: note: object of size 26 allocated by 'kmem_cache_alloc_trace'
581 | return kmem_cache_alloc_trace(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
582 | kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags)][index],
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
583 | flags, size);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from fs/jffs2/nodelist.h:22:
In function 'jffs2_sum_add_mem',
inlined from 'jffs2_sum_add_inode_mem' at fs/jffs2/summary.c:130:9:
fs/jffs2/summary.c:79:73: warning: array subscript 'union jffs2_sum_mem[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'unsigned char[26]' [-Warray-bounds]
79 | s->sum_size += JFFS2_SUMMARY_DIRENT_SIZE(item->d.nsize);
fs/jffs2/summary.h:34:80: note: in definition of macro 'JFFS2_SUMMARY_DIRENT_SIZE'
34 | S2_SUMMARY_DIRENT_SIZE(x) (sizeof(struct jffs2_sum_dirent_flash) + (x))
| ^
In function 'kmalloc',
inlined from 'jffs2_sum_add_inode_mem' at fs/jffs2/summary.c:118:37:
./include/linux/slab.h:581:24: note: object of size 26 allocated by 'kmem_cache_alloc_trace'
581 | return kmem_cache_alloc_trace(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
582 | kmalloc_caches[kmalloc_type(flags)][index],
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
583 | flags, size);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
These warnings are introduced by commit e631ddba5887833 ("[JFFS2] Add erase
block summary support (mount time improvement)") and unfortunately, initial
mainline commit at 1da177e4c3f415 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2").
These doesn't cause build failure, however.
Cc-ing commiters and authors of these commits (Linus is already on Cc list).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/67] 5.18.2-rc1 review
2022-06-05 7:02 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2022-06-05 7:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-06-05 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagas Sanjaya
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade, Ferenc Havasi, Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 02:02:21PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:43:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.2 release.
> > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
>
> Successfully cross-compiled for arm (multi_v7_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0, neon
> FPU) and arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
>
> On arm64 build, I found partly outside array bounds warning:
The kernel does not build cleanly on gcc12 just yet, so it will be a
while before stuff like this goes away. Please submit patches to the
proper subsystem developers to help resolve this.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread