All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: potential information leak in do_fb_ioctl()
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:16:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <734ef2833e4e4e7bded92e9d964bc2415aadf3c4.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030201201.GA3209@xps-13>

On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 21:12 +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Then memset() + memcpy() is probably the best option,
> since copying all those fields one by one looks quite ugly to me...

A memset of an automatic before a memcpy to the same
automatic is unnecessary.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: potential information leak in do_fb_ioctl()
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:16:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <734ef2833e4e4e7bded92e9d964bc2415aadf3c4.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030201201.GA3209@xps-13>

On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 21:12 +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Then memset() + memcpy() is probably the best option,
> since copying all those fields one by one looks quite ugly to me...

A memset of an automatic before a memcpy to the same
automatic is unnecessary.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: potential information leak in do_fb_ioctl()
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:16:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <734ef2833e4e4e7bded92e9d964bc2415aadf3c4.camel@perches.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191031181639.tUzwjIJEuxNSbC7bITZi6LAmppeQStG-OVe-1DFqb3w@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030201201.GA3209@xps-13>

On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 21:12 +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Then memset() + memcpy() is probably the best option,
> since copying all those fields one by one looks quite ugly to me...

A memset of an automatic before a memcpy to the same
automatic is unnecessary.


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-31 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-29 18:23 [PATCH] fbdev: potential information leak in do_fb_ioctl() Dan Carpenter
2019-10-29 18:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-29 18:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-29 18:35 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-29 18:35   ` Joe Perches
2019-10-29 18:35   ` Joe Perches
2019-10-29 19:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-29 19:02   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-29 19:02   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-30  7:43   ` Andrea Righi
2019-10-30  7:43     ` Andrea Righi
2019-10-30  7:43     ` Andrea Righi
2019-10-30 19:26     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-30 19:26       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-30 19:26       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-30 20:12       ` Andrea Righi
2019-10-30 20:12         ` Andrea Righi
2019-10-30 20:12         ` Andrea Righi
2019-10-31 18:16         ` Joe Perches [this message]
2019-10-31 18:16           ` Joe Perches
2019-10-31 18:16           ` Joe Perches
2019-10-31 22:12           ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-31 22:12             ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-10-31 22:12             ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-01-03 13:07   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-03 13:07     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-03 13:07     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-13 11:08     ` [PATCH v2] " Dan Carpenter
2020-01-13 11:08       ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-13 11:08       ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-15 14:31       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-15 14:31         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-15 14:31         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-13 12:49     ` [PATCH] " Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-13 12:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-13 12:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-15 13:09       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-15 13:09         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-15 13:09         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-01-15 13:16         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-15 13:16           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-15 13:16           ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=734ef2833e4e4e7bded92e9d964bc2415aadf3c4.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.