All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
@ 2020-03-16 13:57 Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  2020-03-17 22:30 ` Daniel Axtens
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pratik Rajesh Sampat @ 2020-03-16 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, psampat, pratik.r.sampat, ego, dja

The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'

Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
 void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 	cpumask_t mask;
 
@@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	chip->restore = false;
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
 		int index;
-		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 
-		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
-		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
-		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
-		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
+		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+		if (!policy)
+			continue;
+		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
+		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
+		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
+		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 out:
 	put_online_cpus();
-- 
2.24.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
  2020-03-16 13:57 [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn Pratik Rajesh Sampat
@ 2020-03-17 22:30 ` Daniel Axtens
  2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Axtens @ 2020-03-17 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat, linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel,
	psampat, pratik.r.sampat, ego

Hi Pratik,

Thanks.

I have checked:

 - for matching puts/gets
 - that all the '.' to '->' conversions, aud uses of '&' check out
 - that the Snowpatch checks pass (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1255580/)

On that basis:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>

Regards,
Daniel

> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>
> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned int cpu;
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  
> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  	chip->restore = false;
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>  		int index;
> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>  
> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +		if (!policy)
> +			continue;
> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  	}
>  out:
>  	put_online_cpus();
> -- 
> 2.24.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
  2020-03-16 13:57 [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn Pratik Rajesh Sampat
@ 2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-03-19 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  Cc: linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, pratik.r.sampat, ego, dja,
	Michael Ellerman

On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
> 
> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>

Any objections or concerns here?

If not, I'll queue it up.

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned int cpu;
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  
> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  	chip->restore = false;
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>  		int index;
> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>  
> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +		if (!policy)
> +			continue;
> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  	}
>  out:
>  	put_online_cpus();
> 





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
@ 2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-03-19 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  Cc: ego, pratik.r.sampat, linux-pm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, dja

On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
> 
> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>

Any objections or concerns here?

If not, I'll queue it up.

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned int cpu;
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  
> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  	chip->restore = false;
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>  		int index;
> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>  
> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +		if (!policy)
> +			continue;
> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  	}
>  out:
>  	put_online_cpus();
> 





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
  2020-03-16 13:57 [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn Pratik Rajesh Sampat
@ 2020-03-20 10:37   ` Gautham R Shenoy
  2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R Shenoy @ 2020-03-20 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  Cc: linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, pratik.r.sampat, ego, dja

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 07:27:43PM +0530, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>

Thanks for fixing this.

> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned int cpu;
>  	cpumask_t mask;
> 
> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  	chip->restore = false;
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>  		int index;
> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
> 
> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +		if (!policy)
> +			continue;
> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  	}
>  out:
>  	put_online_cpus();
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
@ 2020-03-20 10:37   ` Gautham R Shenoy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R Shenoy @ 2020-03-20 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  Cc: ego, pratik.r.sampat, linux-pm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, dja

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 07:27:43PM +0530, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>

Thanks for fixing this.

> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned int cpu;
>  	cpumask_t mask;
> 
> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  	chip->restore = false;
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>  		int index;
> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
> 
> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +		if (!policy)
> +			continue;
> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  	}
>  out:
>  	put_online_cpus();
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
  2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2020-03-24  6:34     ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-03-24  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  Cc: linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, pratik.r.sampat, ego, dja

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
>> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
>> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>> 
>> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Any objections or concerns here?
>
> If not, I'll queue it up.

I have it in my testing branch, but if you pick it up I can drop it.

cheers

>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>  {
>>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
>> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>>  	unsigned int cpu;
>>  	cpumask_t mask;
>>  
>> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	chip->restore = false;
>>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>>  		int index;
>> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>>  
>> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
>> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
>> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
>> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
>> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>> +		if (!policy)
>> +			continue;
>> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
>> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
>> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
>> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>>  	}
>>  out:
>>  	put_online_cpus();
>> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
@ 2020-03-24  6:34     ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-03-24  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Pratik Rajesh Sampat
  Cc: ego, pratik.r.sampat, linux-pm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, dja

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
>> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
>> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>> 
>> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Any objections or concerns here?
>
> If not, I'll queue it up.

I have it in my testing branch, but if you pick it up I can drop it.

cheers

>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>>  void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>  {
>>  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
>> +	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>>  	unsigned int cpu;
>>  	cpumask_t mask;
>>  
>> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	chip->restore = false;
>>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>>  		int index;
>> -		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>>  
>> -		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
>> -		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
>> -		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
>> -		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
>> +		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>> +		if (!policy)
>> +			continue;
>> +		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
>> +		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
>> +		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
>> +		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>>  	}
>>  out:
>>  	put_online_cpus();
>> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
  2020-03-24  6:34     ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2020-03-25 10:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-03-25 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Pratik Rajesh Sampat, linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel,
	pratik.r.sampat, ego, dja

On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:34:56 AM CET Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> > On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> >> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> >> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
> >> 
> >> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> >> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Any objections or concerns here?
> >
> > If not, I'll queue it up.
> 
> I have it in my testing branch,

Great!

> but if you pick it up I can drop it.

Let it go in through your tree.

Cheers!




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
@ 2020-03-25 10:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2020-03-25 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: ego, pratik.r.sampat, linux-pm, linux-kernel,
	Pratik Rajesh Sampat, linuxppc-dev, dja

On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:34:56 AM CET Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> > On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> >> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> >> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
> >> 
> >> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> >> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Any objections or concerns here?
> >
> > If not, I'll queue it up.
> 
> I have it in my testing branch,

Great!

> but if you pick it up I can drop it.

Let it go in through your tree.

Cheers!




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
  2020-03-16 13:57 [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn Pratik Rajesh Sampat
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-20 10:37   ` Gautham R Shenoy
@ 2020-03-26 12:06 ` Michael Ellerman
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-03-26 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat, linux-pm, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel,
	psampat, pratik.r.sampat, ego, dja

On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 13:57:43 UTC, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
> 
> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d95fe371ecd28901f11256c610b988ed44e36ee2

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-26 12:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-16 13:57 [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2020-03-17 22:30 ` Daniel Axtens
2020-03-19 10:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-19 10:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24  6:34   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-24  6:34     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-25 10:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-25 10:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-20 10:37 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-03-20 10:37   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-03-26 12:06 ` Michael Ellerman

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.